This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Another bootstrap failure. Branch is now closed.


> 
> Yet another bootstrap failure.  Could you folks *please* be more
> careful?
> 
> The branch is now closed until all these bootstrap problems are
> straightened out.
> 
> 
> Diego.
> 
> See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
> make[4]: *** [new_op.lo] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/dorothy/dnovillo/sbox/tree-ssa-branch/bld.dorothy/alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/dorothy/dnovillo/sbox/tree-ssa-branch/bld.dorothy/alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3'
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/dorothy/dnovillo/sbox/tree-ssa-branch/bld.dorothy/alphaev67-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3'
> make[1]: *** [all-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/dorothy/dnovillo/sbox/tree-ssa-branch/bld.dorothy'
> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2

Hope it won't take long.  The patch bellow fixed MIPS64 bootstrap
suffering exactly same warning as PPC bootstrap you reported (I can not
test PPC64).  Zdenek has patch in testing to fix verify_flow_faiulre on
x86_64 that is probably identical to you you see on Alpha even when it
is cutted out of your message.
Sorry for the failures.  None of those showed up on i386 bootstraps we
use for testing.  I wonder why the failures are getting so architecture
specific nature when the tree-ssa should not differ much.

Honza


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]