This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>,gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>,Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>,Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:19:21 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
References: <200311102053.hAAKrbGO020601@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <1068498733.23285.1.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

On Nov 10, 2003, at 4:12 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:

On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 15:53, law@redhat.com wrote:

FWIW, what I do is I keep a .i file for all the gcc source files and time compiling all of those. It's a slightly broader test than picking a single source file.
It's also a good idea to keep .ii files from libstdc++.  Too bad that
Java doesn't generate .i files that can be used this way.

This has actually always annoyed me. It prevents one from just adding -save-temps to the CFLAGS, and getting something you can run JC1 on. You have to copy the gcj command line, add -v, then copy the jc1 command line.

Diego.

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]