This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Tree sharing issues...

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: law at redhat dot com, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:21:49 -0800
Subject: Re: Tree sharing issues...
References: <20031119230806.GU11681@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <200311192311.hAJNAxYj013034@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <20031119231730.GV11681@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:17:30AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> The array reference above is other stuff.  If you think it makes
> sense, I will add check for ARRAY_REF with all operands passing
> is_gimple_min_invariant.  DOes that sound plausible?

Yes.  Similar with INDIRECT_REF, ADDR_EXPR, COMPONENT_REF,
the two complex operators.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tree sharing issues...
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- Re: Tree sharing issues...
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Tree sharing issues...
  - From: law
- Re: Tree sharing issues...
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]