This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Gimplification and simplification

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>,Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:50:19 +0100
Subject: Re: Gimplification and simplification
References: <20031105151845.GU13705@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <1068045997.19283.24.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20031105153630.GW13705@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20031105195255.GA29228@redhat.com>

> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:36:30PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Not, actually already gimplifier is smart enought to fold builtins but
> > it is not smart enought to fold resulting expressions.
> 
> Might take care of this in remove_useless...
That sounds like resonable place (assuming we call it just before
optimization not after as we do right now that is causing me all sorts
of problems with CFG based expansion code).

Honza
> 
> 
> r~

References:
- Gimplification and simplification
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Gimplification and simplification
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Gimplification and simplification
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Gimplification and simplification
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]