This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?

From: fche at redhat dot com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 21 Nov 2003 15:02:10 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?
References: <20031121190101.GA1217@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz><1069441953.5285.0.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>

dnovillo wrote:

> > Any opinions for or against it?
> We need high gimple for mudflap.

... or maybe not, with yesterday's changes.  Still it'd be great if
tree-ssa folks at least compare -fmudflap tests before/after such
a representation change, so we can get some earlier notification
of impending breakage.

- FChE

References:
- [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [tree-ssa] Producing lowered gimple directly?
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]