This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Future of gccbug



On Nov 9, 2003, at 1:16 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:


Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:

| Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
|
| > At present it's impossible to spot the new reports amongst the dross that
| > fills the bug-gcc list, which tends to mean that I have to ignore the list
| > entirely and rely on searches for possible that might be of interest.
|
| You can split on "New: " in the subject. Procmail is your friend.


I second Richard here.  Not just because it would be possible to split
on "New: " means  it is convenient to put all bugzilla traffic in
gcc-bugs.  It would really become more readable if bugzilla traffic
were put on a dedicated list.  Given that follow ups in bugzilla
traffic don't thread well

Yes, but if we fix that threading problem, do you still want two lists?
Copying all bug messages to two lists, where one only gets New messages, is pretty annoying to code, to be honest.
What we have now, where gcc-bugs gets all the mail, was quite easy to do.
--Dan



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]