This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:56:47 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <20031126125844.GA6045@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1069861306.5057.27.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20031126154953.GA2969@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:49, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:

> OK.  Is there some specification of what exactly may be a gimple
> expression somewhere?  There is something in tree-simple.c, but it
> is inaccurate and outdated.
> 
It shouldn't be.  tree-simple.c contains the GIMPLE grammar.  If it's
missing something, it should be fixed.  The is_gimple_* predicates are
used to validate expressions.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

References:
- [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] Virtual operands of &a[1]?
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]