This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question about libffi closure

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:14:55 -0500
Subject: Re: Question about libffi closure
References: <u8k75wig50.fsf@gromit.moeb> <16315.41172.965947.247986@masala.cambridge.redhat.com> <u84qx0gl4i.fsf@gromit.moeb> <200311192046.hAJKkVT27314@makai.watson.ibm.com> <16315.60133.124063.153453@masala.cambridge.redhat.com>

>>>>> Andrew Haley writes:

Andrew> We're only changing the testsuite.   We can ifdef where necessary.
  
	And you can test on a variety of systems before changing the
testsuite.  Substituting failures on one set of systems for another is not
progress.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about libffi closure
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- Question about libffi closure
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Question about libffi closure
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Question about libffi closure
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Question about libffi closure
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: Question about libffi closure
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]