This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Future of gccbug

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <apinski at apple dot com>, Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 Nov 2003 19:57:17 +0100
Subject: Re: Future of gccbug
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <200311071628.hA7GSDsV008558@relay.rwth-aachen.de><4C3405F1-1140-11D8-BB0C-00039372607E@apple.com><m31xskceus.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><20031107094915.A25549@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:

| So, I'd like to see gccbug modernized and supported.  I'd also like us to
| change language that we have used in various places saying that email
| reports might be ignored.  We can tell people that we prefer that they
| use Bugzilla if at all possible.  If gccbug is modernized, then we can
| tell people with email-only access that gccbug is recommended as second
| choice.  Then there will be very few bugs that get reported directly to
| the bug list without a script, and it shouldn't be too hard to catch
| those.

All that makes sense to me.

-- Gaby

References:
- Future of gccbug
  - From: Volker Reichelt
- Re: Future of gccbug
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Future of gccbug
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Future of gccbug
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]