This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:46:18 -0700
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1068498733.23285.1.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo w
rites:
>On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 15:53, law@redhat.com wrote:
>
>> FWIW, what I do is I keep a .i file for all the gcc source files and
>> time compiling all of those. It's a slightly broader test than picking
>> a single source file.
>>
>It's also a good idea to keep .ii files from libstdc++. Too bad that
>Java doesn't generate .i files that can be used this way.
I was doing that for a while too until I got a new box -- I haven't
regenerated the .ii files on the new box :-)
jeff