This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:23:37 -0500
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <200311042117.hA4LHweV017289@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 16:17, law@redhat.com wrote:
> Which causes all kinds of headaches :(
>
Probably a good motivation to go back to the previous behaviour?
# block 2
if (set != -1)
{
# block 3
goto lab;
}
else
{
# block 4
goto lab;
}
lab:
set_1 = PHI (-1 (3), 0 (4))
I haven't thought about it too long, though.
Diego.