This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, law at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:17:58 -0800
Subject: Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
References: <20031119230256.GS11681@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20031119232009.GF1138@redhat.com> <20031119232927.GX11681@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20031119234619.GA1635@redhat.com> <20031120224311.GB341@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:43:11PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I probably can it manage to copy the argument list/return value too and
> inject the new values into structure once I am finished, better ideas?

How about we NOT have the front-end manage this flag at all, and
compute it during optimization always?

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: TREE_ADDRESSABLE problem
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]