This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04


On Monday 10 November 2003 20:29, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> >  >
> >  >Huh??? Timings of what?
> >
> > When I wrote remove_useless_stmts_and_vars I actually took the time to
> > measure how it impacted compile-time performance.
>
> you wrote it working on cfg? Otherwise I don't see how the timing is
> relevant.  Anyway, my patch does not change cfg at all and the only
> thing it does is a simple pass over all statements, so I don't see a
> potential for it to be slow.

This kind of reasoning is why GCC is slowing down all the time.

Yes, a pass over all statements _does_ have a compile time impact.  Especially 
if we keep adding new ones by the dozens claiming that they don't impact 
compile time.

Gr.
Steven


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]