This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Future of gccbug
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- Cc: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 07 Nov 2003 18:33:57 +0100
- Subject: Re: Future of gccbug
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <200311071727.hA7HRnsV014854@relay.rwth-aachen.de>
Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
| SEND-PR: doc-bug The documentation is incorrect.
| SEND-PR: accepts-illegal GCC fails to reject erroneous code.
| SEND-PR: rejects-legal GCC gives an error message for correct code.
| SEND-PR: wrong-code The machine code generated by gcc is incorrect.
| SEND-PR: ice-on-legal-code GCC gives an Internal Compiler Error (ICE)
| SEND-PR: for correct code
| SEND-PR: ice-on-illegal-code GCC gives an ICE instead of reporting an error
| SEND-PR: pessimizes-code GCC misses an important optimization opportunity
| SEND-PR: sw-bug Software bug of some other class than above
| SEND-PR: change-request A feature in GCC is missing.
| SEND-PR: support I need help with gcc.
|
| This is quite different from the set of keywords we do have in bugzilla.
I would think that the proper action is to synchronize, not to remove
the script altogether.