"Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
| Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:
|
| [...]
| > So, I'd like to see gccbug modernized and supported. I'd also
like us to
| > change language that we have used in various places saying that
email
| > reports might be ignored. We can tell people that we prefer that
they
| > use Bugzilla if at all possible. If gccbug is modernized, then we
can
| > tell people with email-only access that gccbug is recommended as
second
| > choice. Then there will be very few bugs that get reported
directly to
| > the bug list without a script, and it shouldn't be too hard to
catch
| > those.
|
| I think it would facilitate this if the mailing list for email
| submission of bug reports were NOT the same as the mailing list that
| gets all the bugzilla traffic. I don't know about anyone else, but I
| find gcc-bugs basically unreadable these days -- which is fine so
long
I must confess my being "annoyed" by gcc-bugs being messed with all
bugzilla traffic (given that they are duplicated) about nearly
everthing. But I thought I was alone...