This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Testing C++ changes (was: Can't build gcc cvs HEAD on cygwin: libjava/prims.cc:145: error: overloaded function with no contextual )type information


Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> writes:

| On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Andreas Tobler wrote:
| > Personally I'd welcome if a core cp change happens that it should be a
| > must to bootstrap a complete gcc (except ada, g77 ?)
| > Libgcj contains a large part of c++. It's a good way to see if your
| > change is safe or if we uncover another problem.
| 
| Given that this would have caught that bootstrap failure I'm tempted to
| agree.
| 
| Jason, Mark, Gaby, what do you think?
 
This seems reasonable to me -- even though I'm a bit worried about the
impact on build + testing time.  But, it is consistent with what we
require for C changes.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]