This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ada updates frozen


kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:

>     > And what about the _TYPE_SIZE macros?  Will they go back to being *sizes*
>     > or remain precisions?
>
>     They need to remain precision (and I will rename them as such)
>     otherwise we cannot know which type to use for C long double on ia64
>     and i386.
>
> OK, but just so you know, it's *that* which breaks Ada currently.

I realize this.  Do you think it will work (at least as a stopgap
measure) for Ada to use 
GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode_for_precision (LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE))
instead of bare LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE?  After I change
GET_MODE_BITSIZE to mean what it used to mean, that is.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]