This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: basic block reordering question.

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:31:56 -0800
Subject: Re: basic block reordering question.
References: <1068825560.2305.93.camel@p4> <20031114201749.GB28319@redhat.com> <1068841519.2358.274.camel@p4>

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 03:25:18PM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> OK, here are the dumps :-)  

Hmm.  Something's gond different before here.  The CFG on entry
to the two dumps is different.  As a result it's not surprising
that they get layed out differently.

I suppose I could look into it further if you sent me (privately)
the preprocessed input...


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: basic block reordering question.
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

References:
- basic block reordering question.
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: basic block reordering question.
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: basic block reordering question.
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]