Re: Future of gccbug

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Nov 7, 2003, at 3:17 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
>
> | > Hmm, then something is wrong somewhere.  Everything that is 
> entered in
> | > bugzilla gets posted to me with a To: gcc-bugs and Reply-To:
> | > gcc-bugzilla.
> |
> | Which is correct, don't wide-reply.
>
> current practice on the GCC mailing lists is wide-reply.  You seem to
> make gcc-bugs an irregural exception (irregular  in the sense that, if
> it comes from bugzilla don't wide-reply.  hmm.).

This is because we never tried to modify/configure the list software to 
do what we want.

> [...]
>
> | Remember, only copying gcc-bugzilla actually gets the comment into 
> the
> | database.
>
> and bugzilla does not put proper references.

Yes it does. It adds both "In-Reply-To" and "References:" as approriate.

This was done so the bugzilla replies thread properly.


> -- Gaby