This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Tree sharing issues...
> On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 18:21, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:17:30AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > The array reference above is other stuff. If you think it makes
> > > sense, I will add check for ARRAY_REF with all operands passing
> > > is_gimple_min_invariant. DOes that sound plausible?
> >
> > Yes. Similar with INDIRECT_REF,
> >
> No. INDIRECT_REF nodes must not be shared, we rename the operand inside
> INDIRECT_REFs.
>
> > ADDR_EXPR,
>
> > COMPONENT_REF,
> >
> Same problem. We also rewrite inside COMPONENT_REFs.
OK. What about the ARRAY_REF issue? Do we have plans to rename inside
too? In that case we probably should fix dominator pass instead
relaxing my tester...
Honza
>
>
> Diego.