This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:37:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1067956749.23315.3.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com>, Diego Novillo w
rites:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030814-4.c scan-tree-dump-times set = -1 0
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030814-5.c scan-tree-dump-times set = -1 0
More fall-out from lowering COND_EXPRs. I don't immediately see how these
could have been passed at all with the lowered COND_EXPR code.
It's not unlike the disabling of jump threading problems the lowered COND_EXPR
code created.
Jeff