This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
Cc: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 30 Nov 2003 04:54:47 +0100
Subject: Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <3FC8E44F.3050105@coyotegulch.com><3FC9272A.4070302@specifixinc.com><87isl2vib1.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><1070156852.1024.33.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org><87ad6ev9yz.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><m3smk6pl7k.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> writes:

| There is a very easy way to warn people that a new release will be
| more buggy, and that is make it a .0 release.

I have the same (non-official) standard as you! :-)

-- Gaby

References:
- Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]