This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:12:14 -0500
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] New regressions as of 2003-11-04
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <200311102053.hAAKrbGO020601@speedy.slc.redhat.com>
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 15:53, law@redhat.com wrote:
> FWIW, what I do is I keep a .i file for all the gcc source files and
> time compiling all of those. It's a slightly broader test than picking
> a single source file.
>
It's also a good idea to keep .ii files from libstdc++. Too bad that
Java doesn't generate .i files that can be used this way.
Diego.