This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: demengler in libstdc++ is changed
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
|
| > Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> writes:
| >
| > | I'm not sure what the problem would be here. It would simply be a C file
| > | that would be compiled and linked into the program. The point is that you
| > | wouldn't _need_ a C++ runtime. In LLVM, the C runtime library for
| > | setjmp/longjmp is written in C++, for example, and is compiled into C
| > | programs all of the time without lib(sup|std)c++.
| >
| > Many C++ runtime implementors have reached the conclusion that the C
| > runtime is far more efficiently and effectively implemented on top of
| > C++ (rather than the inverse); however that idea seems to meet
| > (non-technical) resistance (I have no workable theory of why).
|
| Well, one obvious reason is that not all C programmers want to learn
| C++.
I fully understand that. But, I'm not requesting C programmers to
learn C++.
-- Gaby