gcc archive
author index for November, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

• 2005-11-15 06:08 精彩HDTV高清影碟.机等时尚家电尽在www.hdtvshop.org

聂久焘

• 2005-11-23 11:41 [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?

Frédéric PRACA

• 2005-11-21 16:14 Ada on ARM
• 2005-11-21 18:26 Re: Ada on ARM
• 2005-11-21 19:35 Re: Ada on ARM
• 2005-11-23 12:03 Compilation of Ada for Arm failed

François-Xavier Coudert

• 2005-11-02 11:20 Re: [gfortran] fortran preprocessing, round 2
• 2005-11-03 22:15 Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking
• 2005-11-04 08:20 Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking
• 2005-11-04 09:10 Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-04 12:32 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-04 15:21 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-09 16:13 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-10 09:03 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-18 12:51 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-23 23:06 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-24 13:19 mips-irix6.5 and complex.h

Kövesdi György

• 2005-11-22 15:22 m68k exception handling

Rafael Espíndola

• 2005-11-10 00:47 [Treelang] flag_signed_char
• 2005-11-22 16:37 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 17:46 Re: The actual LLVM integration patch
• 2005-11-24 17:50 Re: should _GNU_SOURCE be used in libiberty if glibc is present?
• 2005-11-25 13:00 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-29 18:07 updated llvm patch to the apple branch
• 2005-11-29 21:49 LLVM patch X function lowering

René Rebe

• 2005-11-06 17:58 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-30 07:54 Re: Performance regression testing?

Érsek László

• 2005-11-06 06:28 successful 3.3.6 bootstrap on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Branko Äibej

• 2005-11-03 03:43 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 22:32 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 22:45 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 23:28 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-04 00:56 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-16 02:17 Re: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch
• 2005-11-25 01:32 Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems

Pedro LamarÃo

• 2005-11-14 22:24 [c++] stuff proposed for C++0x

Adrian Prantl

• 2005-11-11 08:53 UNITS vs. BYTES

Alan Modra

• 2005-11-24 01:31 Re: overcoming info build failures
• 2005-11-25 04:09 LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS vs address_reloaded
• 2005-11-27 23:29 Re: LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS vs address_reloaded

Albert Chin

• 2005-11-04 12:21 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-07 01:35 Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?
• 2005-11-07 23:40 Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?
• 2005-11-08 03:14 Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?
• 2005-11-09 01:22 Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?

Aldy Hernandez

• 2005-11-10 12:43 PR24138 and flexible arrays in C++
• 2005-11-10 20:10 [RFC] PR C++/24138
• 2005-11-17 21:34 [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-17 22:08 pruning unused debugging types (enums/PR23336)
• 2005-11-18 00:43 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-18 20:09 Re: pruning unused debugging types (enums/PR23336)

Alex Tzanov

• 2005-11-04 15:24 F77 code under gcc

Alexander

• 2005-11-28 09:03 How implemented "typeof"

amylaar

• 2005-11-04 01:32 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?

anandi.thirunavukkarasu

• 2005-11-28 08:31 matching function for out_waiting in gcc 3.4.2

Andi Kleen

• 2005-11-04 18:40 Re: GCC-generated code and i386 condition codes behavior

Andreas Jaeger

• 2005-11-10 11:27 fixincludes make check broken?

Andreas Schwab

• 2005-11-01 21:08 Re: Bug in install of gfortran for gcc-4.0.2
• 2005-11-03 21:58 Re: timezone of svn server for -r?
• 2005-11-03 22:55 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 23:09 Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking
• 2005-11-03 23:15 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-04 17:17 Re: *-rtems status on head was Re: cross newlib builds on svn head
• 2005-11-18 23:34 Re: Incompatible behavior -O0, -O3, std::cout
• 2005-11-20 18:53 Re: Overwrite a file with "svn update"?
• 2005-11-20 19:40 Re: Overwrite a file with "svn update"?
• 2005-11-21 17:07 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-27 17:13 Re: 20040309-1.c vs overflow being undefined
• 2005-11-27 17:37 Re: 20040309-1.c vs overflow being undefined

Andrew Haley

• 2005-11-01 12:44 Re: possible problem with long double
• 2005-11-12 17:19 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 17:29 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 11:24 Re: Java on uClinux (was: Null pointer check elimination)
• 2005-11-15 11:52 Re: Java on uClinux
• 2005-11-15 16:59 Re: Java on uClinux (was: Null pointer check elimination)
• 2005-11-16 11:26 Re: Adding the D programming language
• 2005-11-18 11:40 Directly generating binary code [Was Re: Link-time optimzation]
• 2005-11-19 08:46 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-28 20:52 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal

Andrew MacLeod

• 2005-11-17 16:53 Register Allocation
• 2005-11-18 15:28 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-23 17:07 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-23 17:08 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-23 17:08 Re: Register Allocation

Andrew Pinski

• 2005-11-01 14:25 Re: insufficient inline optimisation?
• 2005-11-01 22:41 Re: [gfortran] fortran preprocessing, round 2
• 2005-11-02 19:21 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 00:54 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 01:55 Re: SH: PR target/24445
• 2005-11-05 18:35 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 19:11 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-07 15:48 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 16:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-11 16:56 Re: CSiBE compile time improvement
• 2005-11-12 00:15 Re: darwin building ppc64 libjava?
• 2005-11-12 18:38 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 21:03 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 23:38 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-13 00:22 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 03:18 Re: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch
• 2005-11-15 15:47 Re: 'gcc -whatever' unrecognized option returns 0
• 2005-11-15 19:12 Re: 10 Nov notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call
• 2005-11-15 19:15 Re: 10 Nov notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call
• 2005-11-16 21:38 Re: Syntax question
• 2005-11-16 22:41 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-16 22:58 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 00:02 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 00:25 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 01:53 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 21:53 Re: Incompatible behavior -O0, -O3, std::cout
• 2005-11-20 01:47 Re: Somebody broke bootstrap on trunk for x86_64
• 2005-11-20 01:51 Re: Somebody broke bootstrap on trunk for x86_64
• 2005-11-20 03:28 Re: Somebody broke bootstrap on trunk for x86_64
• 2005-11-20 03:41 Re: Somebody broke bootstrap on trunk for x86_64
• 2005-11-21 05:02 Re: Abnormal behavior of malloc in gcc-3.2.2
• 2005-11-21 05:19 Re: Abnormal behavior of malloc in gcc-3.2.2
• 2005-11-26 16:08 Re: ppc-linux and s390-linux compilers requiring 64-bit HWI?
• 2005-11-27 17:02 20040309-1.c vs overflow being undefined
• 2005-11-27 17:21 Re: 20040309-1.c vs overflow being undefined
• 2005-11-27 17:26 Re: 20040309-1.c vs overflow being undefined
• 2005-11-28 17:19 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 17:41 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 20:40 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 22:14 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-29 00:42 Re: Java on uClinux
• 2005-11-29 04:48 Re: port of the LLVM patch to the trunk
• 2005-11-29 06:18 Re: The actual LLVM integration patch

Anthony Green

• 2005-11-29 20:37 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 21:12 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

Anthony Shipman

• 2005-11-01 12:07 insufficient inline optimisation?
• 2005-11-22 09:39 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal

Anton Soppelsa

• 2005-11-22 14:49 Gcc help pages about __mode__ keyword

Arnaud Charlet

• 2005-11-16 09:13 Re: arm-rtems Ada Aligned_Word compilation error
• 2005-11-17 08:44 Re: Ada Broken with h_errno change
• 2005-11-21 07:14 Re: ACATS script generation problem
• 2005-11-21 15:46 Re: Ada Broken with h_errno change
• 2005-11-23 08:40 Re: Copies of the GCC repository

avalanche

• 2005-11-18 22:45 Sta cekate?

Balaji V. Iyer

• 2005-11-16 05:33 Extracting destination register from an instruction
• 2005-11-20 23:39 Vectorizer in GCC 4.0
• 2005-11-22 00:27 RE: Vectorizer in GCC 4.0

Ben Elliston

• 2005-11-23 03:27 dfp-branch merge plans
• 2005-11-24 00:56 overcoming info build failures
• 2005-11-29 23:53 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 23:59 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-30 21:22 Re: Adding new target OS for GCC

Benj FitzPatrick

• 2005-11-01 20:43 non coding contributions

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2005-11-22 18:17 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 19:07 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 19:21 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO

Bernd Schmidt

• 2005-11-15 11:18 Java on uClinux (was: Null pointer check elimination)
• 2005-11-15 11:49 Re: Java on uClinux
• 2005-11-18 09:29 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-29 00:40 Re: Java on uClinux

Bernhard R. Link

• 2005-11-02 19:29 Re: -Wuninitialized issues

bil

• 2005-11-14 10:15 Change in order of evaluation in 4.0.2

Bobby McNulty

• 2005-11-02 23:20 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-09 06:50 i686-pc-cygwin crash gcc-4.0 branch
• 2005-11-09 07:39 Re: i686-pc-cygwin crash gcc-4.0 branch
• 2005-11-11 23:57 Re: i686-pc-cygwin crash gcc-4.0 branch

Boehm, Hans

• 2005-11-15 21:11 RE: Null pointer check elimination

Brian Dessent

• 2005-11-09 07:30 Re: i686-pc-cygwin crash gcc-4.0 branch
• 2005-11-09 16:00 Re: i686-pc-cygwin crash gcc-4.0 branch
• 2005-11-12 00:20 Re: i686-pc-cygwin crash gcc-4.0 branch

Brian Makin

• 2005-11-13 20:13 Re: Adding the D programming language

Bryan Ford

• 2005-11-04 11:15 Re: GCC-generated code and i386 condition codes behavior

Cauchy Song

• 2005-11-21 01:27 Checksum mismatch
• 2005-11-21 01:51 Re: Checksum mismatch

cedric

• 2005-11-17 15:39 specific instantiation of static members from template class

chris jefferson

• 2005-11-23 11:53 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?

Chris Lattner

• 2005-11-02 18:01 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 18:55 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 19:44 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 21:59 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-17 00:52 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-19 01:51 LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-19 04:43 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-19 17:56 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-19 18:23 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-19 22:22 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-20 00:49 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-20 00:57 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-22 01:24 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-22 22:27 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 22:31 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 22:44 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 22:50 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 22:52 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 23:01 The actual LLVM integration patch
• 2005-11-23 02:24 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 02:28 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 18:13 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-28 02:32 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-28 02:54 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-29 06:26 Re: The actual LLVM integration patch
• 2005-11-29 22:05 Re: LLVM patch X function lowering

Christian . Iseli

• 2005-11-30 16:32 Re: Suggestion

Christian Joensson

• 2005-11-08 15:05 [gomp] ./libgomp_f.h:71: error: size of array 'test' is negative
• 2005-11-08 16:00 Re: [gomp] ./libgomp_f.h:71: error: size of array 'test' is negative
• 2005-11-08 17:37 Re: [gomp] ./libgomp_f.h:71: error: size of array 'test' is negative
• 2005-11-08 18:28 Re: [gomp] ./libgomp_f.h:71: error: size of array 'test' is negative
• 2005-11-09 06:31 Re: [gomp] ./libgomp_f.h:71: error: size of array 'test' is negative
• 2005-11-24 08:00 Re: Results for 2.16.91 20051124 testsuite on sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-24 12:41 Re: overcoming info build failures

Craig N. Scott

• 2005-11-03 03:22 Successful build of gcc 3.3.4

Dale Johannesen

• 2005-11-18 02:33 Re: Link-time optimzation

Daniel Berlin

• 2005-11-01 15:48 SVK Tarball for complete trunk history
• 2005-11-02 16:17 Re: Library commits vs Bugzilla
• 2005-11-02 16:24 Re: Library commits vs Bugzilla
• 2005-11-02 23:28 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-02 23:39 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 20:01 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 23:29 Re: svn repository incorrectly converted or corrupted
• 2005-11-03 23:53 Re: svn repository incorrectly converted or corrupted
• 2005-11-04 00:09 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 00:12 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 00:14 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 00:18 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 03:24 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 14:53 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 15:38 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 16:01 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 16:26 RE: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-05 00:30 Re: The new gcc_release script hasn't been pushed to production
• 2005-11-05 01:15 Re: The new gcc_release script hasn't been pushed to production
• 2005-11-08 18:47 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-08 19:01 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-10 19:53 Re: r106743 - in /trunk/gcc: ChangeLog Makefile.in ...
• 2005-11-11 19:46 Re: Using Alias analysis
• 2005-11-12 16:38 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 04:02 Re: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch
• 2005-11-17 00:32 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 14:09 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-19 05:18 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-19 19:08 Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems
• 2005-11-21 17:22 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-21 17:33 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-21 18:06 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-22 16:02 Re: New SVN repo is up
• 2005-11-22 16:30 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-22 16:45 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 17:28 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 18:47 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 18:53 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 19:06 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 20:09 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 04:28 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-23 11:50 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-25 18:32 Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems
• 2005-11-26 02:39 Re: Alias analysis of parameters
• 2005-11-27 20:55 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-29 21:38 Re: [RFH] Restrict support for trees
• 2005-11-30 13:37 Re: SVN Problem?
• 2005-11-30 15:58 Re: SVN conversion glitch?
• 2005-11-30 22:55 Re: SVN conversion glitch?

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2005-11-03 01:45 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 03:26 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 03:27 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 04:28 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 20:04 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-03 20:11 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-07 15:27 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 15:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-08 01:17 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-08 18:42 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-08 18:56 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-09 02:48 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-13 19:15 Re: Where is TARGET_EXPLICIT_RELOCS defined for MIPS?
• 2005-11-13 19:23 Re: Where is TARGET_EXPLICIT_RELOCS defined for MIPS?
• 2005-11-15 02:26 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-15 02:30 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-15 14:24 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-15 21:25 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-17 01:31 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 02:13 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 03:27 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-19 03:47 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-19 04:17 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-19 21:33 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-20 05:25 Re: Working with SVK: how to get it actually work?
• 2005-11-21 19:40 Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-21 21:31 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-22 04:53 Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems
• 2005-11-22 16:12 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-22 16:37 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 23:52 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 05:19 Re: dfp-branch merge plans
• 2005-11-23 05:21 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-28 15:22 Re: C++ vague linkage data
• 2005-11-29 02:06 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 19:48 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 21:12 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 22:41 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

Dario Massarin

• 2005-11-17 10:23 Cirrus arm Maverick Crunch fixes
• 2005-11-17 11:08 Re: Cirrus arm Maverick Crunch fixes
• 2005-11-17 17:16 Re: Cirrus arm Maverick Crunch fixes

Dave Korn

• 2005-11-01 13:15 RE: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal
• 2005-11-01 18:28 RE: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal
• 2005-11-03 12:00 RE: Patch reviews for 4.1
• 2005-11-04 11:11 RE: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 15:08 RE: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 16:23 RE: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 16:37 RE: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-21 18:12 Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-22 13:27 RE: typedefs
• 2005-11-22 15:33 RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-22 19:02 RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-22 20:39 RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 17:29 RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-30 16:41 RE: Suggestion

David Daney

• 2005-11-10 17:56 RFC/RFH: My new library call rewriting optimization pass is ICEing
• 2005-11-12 05:53 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 07:39 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 19:44 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-18 22:55 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-21 21:13 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?

David Edelsohn

• 2005-11-02 02:38 Re: powerpc/rs6000 implicit FPU usage
• 2005-11-22 19:28 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 23:42 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-25 20:10 Re: gcc 4.1 release showstopper on darwin
• 2005-11-29 02:26 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

David Taylor

• 2005-11-03 19:59 Re: -Wuninitialized issues

Denis Chertykov

• 2005-11-15 17:00 Re: cross builds to avr fail
• 2005-11-19 20:20 Re: Register Allocation

Devang Patel

• 2005-11-08 18:37 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-09 02:41 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-09 02:58 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-17 00:43 Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses
• 2005-11-19 22:40 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-27 19:58 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO

Diego Novillo

• 2005-11-01 16:08 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 18:20 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 18:27 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 00:30 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-04 13:41 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 14:59 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 15:17 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 17:16 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-12 15:40 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 17:16 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 17:25 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 17:30 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 17:39 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 18:17 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 18:53 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 20:33 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-13 00:04 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-13 16:02 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 02:47 New branch: ia64-improvements-branch
• 2005-11-16 13:17 [ia64-improvements] Rename branch
• 2005-11-16 13:20 Re: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch
• 2005-11-16 13:46 Re: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch
• 2005-11-17 12:29 Re: Is there a GIMPLE equivalent of UNSPEC?
• 2005-11-18 11:26 Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18)
• 2005-11-18 11:43 Re: Code getting optimized away after instrumenation for memory analysis
• 2005-11-18 16:46 Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18)
• 2005-11-22 16:20 Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 23:23 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 23:57 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 12:11 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 12:32 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 18:30 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-25 15:29 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO

Dixon, Lee L.

• 2005-11-08 14:33 BROKEN: pthreads and c++ statically linked

DJ Delorie

• 2005-11-02 23:10 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 00:27 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 04:49 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 23:44 Re: svn url shortcuts
• 2005-11-24 14:26 Re: should _GNU_SOURCE be used in libiberty if glibc is present?

dldovinh

• 2005-11-16 14:16 announcement for our members.

Dmitry Yu. Bolkhovityanov

• 2005-11-06 06:22 Problem with commas in macro parameters

Dorit Naishlos

• 2005-11-16 14:31 [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses
• 2005-11-17 15:47 Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-strideaccesses
• 2005-11-17 15:52 Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-strideaccesses
• 2005-11-22 01:19 Re: Vectorizer in GCC 4.0

Doug Evans

• 2005-11-03 18:37 Re: bug 24599
• 2005-11-03 20:13 Re: bug 24599

Doug Graham

• 2005-11-16 14:47 Re: Question about mudflap

Douglas B. Jones

• 2005-11-18 18:52 compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-21 21:05 RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 15:56 RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 17:49 RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 18:34 RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 19:48 RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 19:58 RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 20:20 RE: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9

drizzle drizzle

• 2005-11-11 19:33 Using Alias analysis

Dueway Qi

• 2005-11-20 05:13 Re: GCC 4.2

Ed Smith-Rowland

• 2005-11-16 05:01 Re: Adding the D programming language

emailquangcao2005

• 2005-11-19 06:47 Dich vu moi!!!
• 2005-11-19 06:55 Dich vu moi!!!

ephone_guo

• 2005-11-16 14:21 announcement for our members.

Eric Botcazou

• 2005-11-04 19:33 Unwinding through signal handlers on IA-64/Linux
• 2005-11-05 17:58 Re: [libgfortran] Patch to handle statically linked libgfortran
• 2005-11-05 18:03 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-07 23:52 Re: Question on target specifications for a SPARC machine
• 2005-11-08 00:22 Re: Skipping incompatable libaries on a SPARC cross compile
• 2005-11-08 07:39 Re: Unwinding through signal handlers on IA-64/Linux
• 2005-11-08 16:58 Re: Skipping incompatable libaries on a SPARC cross compile
• 2005-11-12 21:00 Re: cross builds to avr fail
• 2005-11-13 11:08 Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c
• 2005-11-13 12:14 Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c
• 2005-11-16 17:05 Re: ultrasparc3 optimisation
• 2005-11-16 17:07 Re: ultrasparc3 optimisation
• 2005-11-18 20:12 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-18 20:31 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-18 23:01 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-21 21:21 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 17:37 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 18:20 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 19:55 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 20:17 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-22 22:28 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 23:05 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 12:07 Re: Compilation of Ada for Arm failed
• 2005-11-29 04:34 Re: Java on uClinux

Eric Christopher

• 2005-11-15 06:25 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-15 06:59 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault

Eric Fisher

• 2005-11-01 01:40 A question about unable to generate reloads
• 2005-11-02 06:38 A question about memcpy

Eric J. Goforth

• 2005-11-23 19:54 Accidentally on the list....

Falk Hueffner

• 2005-11-27 17:18 Re: 20040309-1.c vs overflow being undefined

Florian Weimer

• 2005-11-01 13:08 Re: insufficient inline optimisation?
• 2005-11-06 20:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 20:34 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 21:07 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-09 12:48 Re: Is "-fdump-tree-original-raw" a stable feature?
• 2005-11-13 05:44 Re: Adding the D programming language
• 2005-11-13 09:34 Re: How Can I Get See A Memory Map For An Executable
• 2005-11-14 09:32 should_duplicate_loop_header_p and volatile asm statements
• 2005-11-14 09:42 Re: should_duplicate_loop_header_p and volatile asm statements

FRANCIS MACHOKA

• 2005-11-25 10:11 Hallo GCC Gurus..

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2005-11-16 14:16 Forw: Question about mudflap
• 2005-11-16 14:16 Re: Question about mudflap

Frank Cusack

• 2005-11-24 07:33 __thread and builtin memcpy() bug

Fredrik Hederstierna

• 2005-11-21 19:14 MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-21 20:53 SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?

FX Coudert

• 2005-11-01 22:23 [gfortran] fortran preprocessing, round 2
• 2005-11-02 22:11 Re: [libgfortran] Patch to handle statically linked libgfortran
• 2005-11-03 10:55 toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking

Gabor Loki

• 2005-11-21 15:45 Re: GCC 4.2

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2005-11-03 01:13 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-06 12:24 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 12:25 Re: Is -fvisibility patch possible on GCC 3.3.x
• 2005-11-07 04:01 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-07 14:39 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-09 03:08 Re: non-ambiguous typedefs
• 2005-11-09 22:18 Re: Is -fvisibility patch possible on GCC 3.3.x
• 2005-11-10 22:36 Re: PR24138 and flexible arrays in C++
• 2005-11-12 18:33 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 18:34 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 18:37 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 20:56 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 20:58 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 21:00 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 21:15 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 23:30 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-13 00:15 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-13 00:58 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-13 01:01 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 20:42 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:07 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:14 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:17 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:53 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:56 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 22:57 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 02:17 Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0?
• 2005-11-15 02:35 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-16 03:47 Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
• 2005-11-16 20:17 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-17 01:43 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-20 04:04 Working with SVK: how to get it actually work?
• 2005-11-20 14:16 Re: Working with SVK: how to get it actually work?
• 2005-11-21 12:12 GCC-3.4.5 Release status report
• 2005-11-21 14:30 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report
• 2005-11-21 17:51 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-21 18:27 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-21 19:36 GCC-3.4.5 pre-release available
• 2005-11-21 20:16 Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-21 22:09 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-21 22:11 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-21 23:31 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-22 15:40 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report
• 2005-11-22 15:54 Re: New SVN repo is up
• 2005-11-22 16:09 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-22 16:11 Re: New SVN repo is up
• 2005-11-22 17:11 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-22 18:27 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 18:59 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 19:37 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 22:59 trees
• 2005-11-23 00:00 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-23 00:05 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 02:43 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 06:48 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-24 00:41 Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 01:09 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 08:57 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 09:37 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 10:05 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 16:31 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 16:50 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 17:11 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-28 10:32 GCC-3.4.5 Release Status
• 2005-11-28 18:52 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status
• 2005-11-28 19:22 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status
• 2005-11-28 20:18 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-29 00:09 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status
• 2005-11-29 04:08 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status
• 2005-11-29 20:50 incomplete type return types
• 2005-11-29 23:13 Re: incomplete type return types
• 2005-11-30 08:37 Re: incomplete type return types
• 2005-11-30 22:20 Re: pr14516 and GCC 3.4
• 2005-11-30 22:32 [C++] cp_token::type and cp_token::keyword

Gary M Mann

• 2005-11-05 21:26 Is -fvisibility patch possible on GCC 3.3.x
• 2005-11-09 21:38 RE: Is -fvisibility patch possible on GCC 3.3.x

gccadmin

• 2005-11-05 17:51 gcc-4.1-20051105 is now available
• 2005-11-08 22:38 gcc-3.4-20051108 is now available
• 2005-11-10 22:39 gcc-4.0-20051110 is now available
• 2005-11-12 17:51 gcc-4.1-20051112 is now available
• 2005-11-15 22:39 gcc-3.4-20051115 is now available
• 2005-11-17 22:40 gcc-4.0-20051117 is now available
• 2005-11-22 22:39 gcc-3.4-20051122 is now available
• 2005-11-24 22:39 gcc-4.0-20051124 is now available
• 2005-11-25 22:41 gcc-4.1-20051125 is now available
• 2005-11-29 22:39 gcc-3.4-20051129 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2005-11-15 22:59 Re: arm-rtems Ada Aligned_Word compilation error
• 2005-11-15 23:27 Re: arm-rtems Ada Aligned_Word compilation error
• 2005-11-18 03:11 Re: Link-time optimzation

Georg Bauhaus

• 2005-11-21 00:04 ACATS script generation problem
• 2005-11-21 09:57 Re: ACATS script generation problem

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2005-11-16 00:37 Re: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch
• 2005-11-16 21:33 svn switch (was: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch)
• 2005-11-17 00:45 Re: New GCC mirror
• 2005-11-21 20:55 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report
• 2005-11-23 19:56 Re: Accidentally on the list....

Giovanni Bajo

• 2005-11-03 23:58 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-05 17:54 [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 18:30 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 18:49 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 19:09 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 19:27 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 02:41 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 12:32 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-08 10:41 Re: svn feature request: print URL in diff output
• 2005-11-14 11:53 Re: Change in order of evaluation in 4.0.2
• 2005-11-17 00:26 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 09:04 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 09:53 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-19 20:00 Re: Overwrite a file with "svn update"?
• 2005-11-20 00:20 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-21 11:19 Re: Abnormal behavior of malloc in gcc-3.2.2
• 2005-11-21 12:41 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report
• 2005-11-22 01:23 Re: typedefs
• 2005-11-24 09:21 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 13:07 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 16:36 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 16:59 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-27 12:26 Re: Wiki pages on tests cases

Graham Stott

• 2005-11-13 19:19 Re: Where is TARGET_EXPLICIT_RELOCS defined for MIPS?
• 2005-11-20 14:33 Re: Somebody broke bootstrap on trunk for x86_64

Gunther Nikl

• 2005-11-30 15:06 pr14516 and GCC 3.4
• 2005-11-30 15:48 Re: SVN conversion glitch?
• 2005-11-30 16:23 Re: SVN conversion glitch?

H. J. Lu

• 2005-11-13 19:01 The Linux binutils 2.16.91.0.4 os released
• 2005-11-14 17:14 Add revision number to gcc version?
• 2005-11-14 22:05 Re: Add revision number to gcc version?

Hagen Paul Pfeifer

• 2005-11-02 09:13 Re: Shared libraries

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2005-11-10 04:55 Re: [RFC] What should be the semantics of a zero-bit bit-field withpragma pack?
• 2005-11-10 18:37 Re: r106743 - in /trunk/gcc: ChangeLog Makefile.in ...
• 2005-11-11 09:05 Re: UNITS vs. BYTES
• 2005-11-17 15:20 Re: m68k does not build on head
• 2005-11-20 16:27 Re: Overwrite a file with "svn update"?
• 2005-11-20 19:31 Re: Overwrite a file with "svn update"?
• 2005-11-29 02:22 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 02:46 Re: m68k exception handling
• 2005-11-29 04:41 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 04:56 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 20:27 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 21:53 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 22:44 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

Hendrik Post

• 2005-11-09 08:49 Is "-fdump-tree-original-raw" a stable feature?

Henrik Sorensen

• 2005-11-25 19:32 Re: Would Like to Contribute, Where to Start?

hoanglanhuong1980

• 2005-11-23 11:02 Anh vao dia chi nay nhe
• 2005-11-23 11:04 Anh vao dia chi nay nhe

Howard Hinnant

• 2005-11-06 17:59 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-09 02:21 non-ambiguous typedefs
• 2005-11-25 18:17 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2005-11-01 04:46 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 04:51 Re: A question about unable to generate reloads
• 2005-11-03 01:39 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 01:52 Re: SH: PR target/24445
• 2005-11-03 04:20 Re: SH: PR target/24445
• 2005-11-03 08:11 Re: Patch reviews for 4.1
• 2005-11-06 20:10 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-10 01:32 Re: Second Try: Assembly Programmer Contributions
• 2005-11-11 17:16 Re: UNITS vs. BYTES
• 2005-11-12 06:54 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-13 05:10 Re: cross builds to avr fail
• 2005-11-14 05:36 Re: inline-unit-growth tweek
• 2005-11-16 15:01 Re: Extracting destination register from an instruction
• 2005-11-17 05:53 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 21:40 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 21:42 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 22:02 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-17 23:18 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-17 23:42 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-19 19:31 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-21 03:36 Re: Creating temporary variables
• 2005-11-21 21:46 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-23 20:43 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-23 23:11 Re: SVN conversion glitch?
• 2005-11-23 23:44 Re: [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds
• 2005-11-30 17:14 Re: pr14516 and GCC 3.4

Inder

• 2005-11-07 06:14 no warning being displayed.
• 2005-11-07 09:00 Re: no warning being displayed.

International School Guide

• 2005-11-05 13:43 Language and academic programs from around the world
• 2005-11-05 13:43 Language and academic programs from around the world

Ioannis E. Venetis

• 2005-11-03 16:52 [gfortran] Problem parsing hexadecimal constants?
• 2005-11-11 16:18 [gfortran] Second try: Problem parsing hexadecimal constants?

Jack Howarth

• 2005-11-25 19:28 gcc 4.1 release showstopper on darwin
• 2005-11-25 20:55 Re: gcc 4.1 release showstopper on darwin

Jakub Jelinek

• 2005-11-01 14:27 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined.
• 2005-11-06 12:40 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-08 14:38 Re: BROKEN: pthreads and c++ statically linked
• 2005-11-08 15:26 Re: [gomp] ./libgomp_f.h:71: error: size of array 'test' is negative
• 2005-11-08 16:12 Re: [gomp] ./libgomp_f.h:71: error: size of array 'test' is negative
• 2005-11-08 20:32 Re: [gomp] ./libgomp_f.h:71: error: size of array 'test' is negative
• 2005-11-23 14:33 SVN conversion glitch?
• 2005-11-26 08:38 ppc-linux and s390-linux compilers requiring 64-bit HWI?
• 2005-11-28 14:49 s390{,x} ABI incompatibility between gcc 4.0 and 4.1
• 2005-11-28 15:20 Re: C++ vague linkage data
• 2005-11-29 14:00 Re: s390{,x} ABI incompatibility between gcc 4.0 and 4.1
• 2005-11-30 10:27 Re: s390{,x} ABI incompatibility between gcc 4.0 and 4.1

James E Wilson

• 2005-11-01 19:52 Re: Bug in install of gfortran for gcc-4.0.2
• 2005-11-03 21:33 Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-09 01:49 Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?
• 2005-11-15 02:40 Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0?
• 2005-11-15 18:35 subversion trouble (was Re: Incorrect default options for h8300target)
• 2005-11-15 19:20 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-15 20:21 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-21 21:19 Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0?
• 2005-11-22 20:10 Re: failed to run testsuite for libstdc++ on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu for target unix/-m32
• 2005-11-22 20:34 Re: Target processor detection

Jan Beulich

• 2005-11-21 15:20 improved ia64 atomic ops

Jan Hoogerbrugge

• 2005-11-18 13:22 Pragma callback to insert text in input buffer?

Jan Hubicka

• 2005-11-17 16:41 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-22 20:04 Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO)
• 2005-11-22 21:04 Re: Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO)

Janis Johnson

• 2005-11-01 21:07 Re: non coding contributions
• 2005-11-03 00:26 Re: [libgfortran] Patch to handle statically linked libgfortran
• 2005-11-15 00:17 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-23 18:56 Re: dfp-branch merge plans

Janne Blomqvist

• 2005-11-04 17:26 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries

Jason . Beech-Brandt

• 2005-11-16 15:58 ultrasparc3 optimisation
• 2005-11-16 16:53 Re: ultrasparc3 optimisation

Jason Merrill

• 2005-11-30 17:18 Re: incomplete type return types

Jeff Stevens

• 2005-11-03 13:13 Re: Howto Cross Compile GCC to run on PPC Platform
• 2005-11-03 15:16 Re: Howto Cross Compile GCC to run on PPC Platform

Jeffrey A Law

• 2005-11-01 01:36 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 01:38 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 05:23 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 17:48 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 18:03 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 18:19 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 19:07 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 19:22 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 17:40 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 17:42 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 17:46 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 18:50 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 19:10 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 19:31 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 19:31 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 00:21 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 01:48 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 01:54 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 02:18 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-09 00:13 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-09 21:32 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-13 21:02 Re: Delay branch scheduling vs. the CFG
• 2005-11-13 21:26 Re: Delay branch scheduling vs. the CFG
• 2005-11-15 21:15 Bogus testcase?
• 2005-11-16 18:04 Re: Bogus testcase?
• 2005-11-16 23:19 Re: Delay branch scheduling vs. the CFG
• 2005-11-17 03:35 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-30 09:01 SVN Problem?
• 2005-11-30 16:56 Re: SVN Problem?

Jim Blandy

• 2005-11-15 09:11 Re: Incorrect default options for h8300 target
• 2005-11-18 17:41 Re: Directly generating binary code [Was Re: Link-time optimzation]
• 2005-11-19 19:29 Re: Overwrite a file with "svn update"?
• 2005-11-21 06:51 Re: Checksum mismatch
• 2005-11-28 08:45 Re: Wiki pages on tests cases

Jim Wilson

• 2005-11-01 00:13 Re: GccPowerpc eabi HowTo - probem with stido functions ( sprintf)
• 2005-11-01 18:59 Re: Bug in install of gfortran for gcc-4.0.2
• 2005-11-01 19:19 Re: dump CFG and callgraph
• 2005-11-01 19:27 Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-07 23:13 Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?
• 2005-11-07 23:19 Re: copyright assignement
• 2005-11-08 00:28 Re: Unwinding through signal handlers on IA-64/Linux
• 2005-11-08 02:27 Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?
• 2005-11-09 00:00 Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?
• 2005-11-15 00:28 Re: new operator in gcc-3.4
• 2005-11-15 00:33 Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0?
• 2005-11-15 00:40 Re: strange result when compiling w/ -fpreprocessed but w/out -fdumpbase
• 2005-11-15 00:43 Re: [gfortran] Second try: Problem parsing hexadecimal constants?
• 2005-11-15 00:59 Re: arm-rtems Ada Aligned_Word compilation error
• 2005-11-15 01:10 Re: [Treelang] flag_signed_char
• 2005-11-15 01:57 Re: fixincludes make check broken?
• 2005-11-15 02:24 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-15 02:48 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-15 03:48 Re: Incorrect default options for h8300 target
• 2005-11-15 20:55 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-18 00:26 Re: question about gcc
• 2005-11-18 01:35 Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0?
• 2005-11-18 02:06 Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
• 2005-11-18 02:35 Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
• 2005-11-21 23:55 Re: failed to run testsuite for libstdc++ on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu for target unix/-m32
• 2005-11-22 00:34 Re: Target processor detection
• 2005-11-22 01:43 Re: A question about having multiple insns for one operation
• 2005-11-23 05:30 Re: Gcc help pages about __mode__ keyword
• 2005-11-29 01:04 Re: __thread and builtin memcpy() bug
• 2005-11-29 01:15 Re: m68k exception handling
• 2005-11-29 03:43 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status
• 2005-11-29 03:53 Re: unable to find a register to spill in class
• 2005-11-29 04:20 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

jkeon

• 2005-11-16 14:37 announcement for our members.

Joe Buck

• 2005-11-01 18:32 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 18:49 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal
• 2005-11-01 19:54 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 00:58 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 01:32 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 01:53 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 17:43 interesting anecdote on gcc speed
• 2005-11-10 22:50 Re: PR24138 and flexible arrays in C++
• 2005-11-14 17:31 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 17:37 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 17:41 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 19:04 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 18:39 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 21:31 Re: Bogus testcase?
• 2005-11-16 20:21 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-16 22:25 Re: Syntax question
• 2005-11-17 23:00 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-18 19:34 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-18 20:24 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-18 22:50 Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
• 2005-11-21 22:49 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-22 17:08 Re: GCC-3.4.5 pre-release available
• 2005-11-23 00:09 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-28 17:20 Re: C++ vague linkage data
• 2005-11-28 18:08 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 23:55 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status
• 2005-11-29 01:18 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 02:21 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 17:32 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 17:54 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

Joel Dice

• 2005-11-07 20:16 Anonymous class closures in g++

Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp dot com>

• 2005-11-03 16:30 cross newlib builds on svn head
• 2005-11-04 16:43 *-rtems status on head was Re: cross newlib builds on svn head
• 2005-11-04 17:10 arm-rtems4.7 Ada update
• 2005-11-10 15:52 arm-rtems Ada Aligned_Word compilation error
• 2005-11-14 14:36 Re: cross newlib builds on svn head
• 2005-11-14 17:58 Re: cross builds to avr fail
• 2005-11-16 14:46 Re: arm-rtems Ada Aligned_Word compilation error
• 2005-11-16 20:49 Ada Broken with h_errno change
• 2005-11-16 21:34 Syntax question
• 2005-11-16 22:09 Re: Syntax question
• 2005-11-17 14:23 m68k does not build on head
• 2005-11-17 22:39 Re: Ada Broken with h_errno change
• 2005-11-18 21:07 RTEMS GCC Status Report
• 2005-11-18 22:05 Re: RTEMS GCC Status Report
• 2005-11-21 15:27 Re: Ada Broken with h_errno change
• 2005-11-21 18:08 Re: Ada on ARM
• 2005-11-21 19:41 Re: Ada on ARM
• 2005-11-21 19:43 Re: Ada on ARM

Joerg Richter

• 2005-11-09 17:23 Re: non-ambiguous typedefs

Joern RENNECKE

• 2005-11-02 22:19 svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-02 23:17 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-02 23:32 Re: SH: PR target/24445
• 2005-11-02 23:47 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-02 23:56 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 16:09 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 19:10 timezone of svn server for -r?
• 2005-11-03 19:15 diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-03 20:08 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-03 20:18 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-03 20:37 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-03 21:27 svn repository incorrectly converted or corrupted
• 2005-11-03 23:47 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 23:49 Re: svn repository incorrectly converted or corrupted
• 2005-11-03 23:55 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-04 01:29 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 15:05 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-04 16:06 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-11 19:34 strange result when compiling w/ -fpreprocessed but w/out -fdumpbase
• 2005-11-16 22:42 Re: Delay branch scheduling vs. the CFG
• 2005-11-24 20:51 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-29 13:45 Re: s390{,x} ABI incompatibility between gcc 4.0 and 4.1
• 2005-11-29 22:01 Re: s390{,x} ABI incompatibility between gcc 4.0 and 4.1
• 2005-11-30 13:09 Re: s390{,x} ABI incompatibility between gcc 4.0 and 4.1

Jonathan Wakely

• 2005-11-17 20:37 Re: specific instantiation of static members from template class
• 2005-11-27 11:58 Wiki pages on tests cases
• 2005-11-28 21:57 Re: matching function for out_waiting in gcc 3.4.2
• 2005-11-28 22:47 Re: Wiki pages on tests cases

Josef Nygrin

• 2005-11-18 19:24 GCC 4.0.2 build report on Fedora Core 3

Joseph S. Myers

• 2005-11-05 01:07 Re: The new gcc_release script hasn't been pushed to production
• 2005-11-19 11:01 Re: GCC 4.1 branch created
• 2005-11-19 11:18 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-22 01:01 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-22 17:40 Re: New SVN repo is up
• 2005-11-22 22:58 Re: Broken link to documentation
• 2005-11-23 14:05 Re: dfp-branch merge plans
• 2005-11-24 12:43 Re: overcoming info build failures
• 2005-11-29 22:58 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

Josh Conner

• 2005-11-01 16:50 [RFC] c++ template instantiation generates zero-sized array (pr 19989)
• 2005-11-02 17:07 Re: [RFC] c++ template instantiation generates zero-sized array (pr19989)
• 2005-11-02 17:42 Re: [RFC] c++ template instantiation generates zero-sized array (pr19989)

Kai Ruottu

• 2005-11-03 14:38 Re: Howto Cross Compile GCC to run on PPC Platform
• 2005-11-03 16:31 Re: Howto Cross Compile GCC to run on PPC Platform
• 2005-11-24 13:42 Re: should _GNU_SOURCE be used in libiberty if glibc is present?

Karel Gardas

• 2005-11-03 17:53 Re: interesting anecdote on gcc speed
• 2005-11-25 10:28 Re: Hallo GCC Gurus..

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2005-11-02 03:10 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 00:04 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 01:31 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 01:35 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-09 02:11 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-19 15:23 svn speed traversing slow filesystems
• 2005-11-22 03:20 Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems
• 2005-11-22 05:46 Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems
• 2005-11-25 18:00 Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems

Kaz Kojima

• 2005-11-02 23:10 SH: PR target/24445
• 2005-11-03 00:40 Re: SH: PR target/24445
• 2005-11-03 02:10 Re: SH: PR target/24445
• 2005-11-03 05:22 Re: SH: PR target/24445

Kazu Hirata

• 2005-11-21 04:05 A question about having multiple insns for one operation

Kean Johnston

• 2005-11-17 02:39 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-25 19:15 Re: Running testsuite with extra --param argument
• 2005-11-25 19:17 Re: Running testsuite with extra --param argument
• 2005-11-28 18:42 Warning bug with -fPIC? (was Re: Some testsuite cleanups (mostly for -fPIC))
• 2005-11-29 03:58 Re: Warning bug with -fPIC? (was Re: Some testsuite cleanups (mostly for -fPIC))

Kelley Cook

• 2005-11-04 23:30 The new gcc_release script hasn't been pushed to production

Kenneth Zadeck

• 2005-11-17 15:54 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 16:17 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 16:25 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-19 20:21 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal

Kevin Puetz

• 2005-11-04 00:38 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?

Koen De Vleeschauwer

• 2005-11-15 17:32 Successful "make bootstrap" of native gcc-4.0.2 on PowerPC 405

Laban, Marinko

• 2005-11-23 11:01 Successfull build & install of GCC 4.0.2

Larry Evans

• 2005-11-15 16:12 Re: Adding the D programming language

Lars Callenbach

• 2005-11-13 20:50 new operator in gcc-3.4

Laurent GUERBY

• 2005-11-12 17:24 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 17:44 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 20:24 Re: cross newlib builds on svn head
• 2005-11-13 16:56 Ada ACATS status
• 2005-11-15 23:11 Re: arm-rtems Ada Aligned_Word compilation error
• 2005-11-16 07:43 Re: arm-rtems Ada Aligned_Word compilation error
• 2005-11-16 22:21 Re: Ada ACATS status
• 2005-11-18 12:04 Re: Directly generating binary code [Was Re: Link-time optimzation]
• 2005-11-18 21:55 Re: RTEMS GCC Status Report
• 2005-11-21 19:16 Re: Ada on ARM
• 2005-11-28 21:05 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-29 19:57 Re: Performance regression testing?

Lee Dixon

• 2005-11-08 15:04 Re: BROKEN: pthreads and c++ statically linked

Leif Ekblad

• 2005-11-30 21:10 Adding new target OS for GCC

Lubos Lunak

• 2005-11-28 15:11 C++ vague linkage data

Ludovic Brenta

• 2005-11-23 21:11 Creating a partial mirror of the repository with SVK

Manu Abraham

• 2005-11-21 21:09 typedefs

Mark Cuss

• 2005-11-07 22:25 Skipping incompatable libaries on a SPARC cross compile
• 2005-11-07 22:43 Re: Skipping incompatable libaries on a SPARC cross compile
• 2005-11-07 23:46 Question on target specifications for a SPARC machine
• 2005-11-08 16:17 Re: Skipping incompatable libaries on a SPARC cross compile
• 2005-11-08 16:46 Re: Skipping incompatable libaries on a SPARC cross compile

Mark Fortescue

• 2005-11-01 12:21 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Canadian Cross Compile
• 2005-11-02 09:56 RE: GCC 4.0.2 Canadian Cross Compile

Mark K. Smith

• 2005-11-15 18:59 10 Nov notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

Mark Mitchell

• 2005-11-01 01:11 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 01:53 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 04:52 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-01 20:56 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 01:12 Re: [RFC] c++ template instantiation generates zero-sized array (pr19989)
• 2005-11-02 17:11 Re: [RFC] c++ template instantiation generates zero-sized array (pr19989)
• 2005-11-02 17:58 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 00:43 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 02:02 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-03 07:14 Patch reviews for 4.1
• 2005-11-03 18:53 GCC mainline now open for bug fixes under normal Stage 3 rules
• 2005-11-06 18:39 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:02 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:26 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:40 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 21:17 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 19:53 Re: [RFC] What should be the semantics of a zero-bit bit-field withpragma pack?
• 2005-11-10 21:24 Re: PR24138 and flexible arrays in C++
• 2005-11-11 20:26 Re: non-ambiguous typedefs
• 2005-11-12 02:37 Re: [RFC] PR C++/24138
• 2005-11-16 22:26 Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 01:28 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 02:55 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-18 06:18 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-18 06:24 Re: pruning unused debugging types (enums/PR23336)
• 2005-11-18 08:48 GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18)
• 2005-11-18 16:24 Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18)
• 2005-11-18 17:47 Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18)
• 2005-11-19 01:03 Re: pruning unused debugging types (enums/PR23336)
• 2005-11-19 04:29 GCC 4.1 branch created
• 2005-11-19 05:19 Re: GCC 4.1 branch created
• 2005-11-19 06:42 GCC 4.2
• 2005-11-22 05:06 Re: GCC 4.2
• 2005-11-23 05:10 Re: trees
• 2005-11-23 22:54 Re: [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds
• 2005-11-23 23:48 Re: [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds
• 2005-11-24 00:48 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 00:59 Re: overcoming info build failures
• 2005-11-24 01:23 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-28 17:00 Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status
• 2005-11-29 00:39 Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 01:34 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 02:05 Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 02:23 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 02:54 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 19:41 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 20:42 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 20:52 Re: incomplete type return types
• 2005-11-29 21:09 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-30 21:10 Re: pr14516 and GCC 3.4

Mark Wielaard

• 2005-11-10 21:28 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry

Markus Trippelsdorf

• 2005-11-08 16:29 Re: Skipping incompatable libaries on a SPARC cross compile

Martin Reinecke

• 2005-11-01 11:06 weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-02 09:40 Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-02 10:35 Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-03 22:02 Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-08 09:51 Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-14 11:52 Mainline bootstrap broken

mathieu lacage

• 2005-11-09 18:19 dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-15 07:20 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-15 11:27 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-17 14:48 Re: Link-time optimzation

Mattias Engdegård

• 2005-11-06 15:32 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?

Michael Garvin

• 2005-11-25 17:49 Would Like to Contribute, Where to Start?

Michael Matz

• 2005-11-18 16:31 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 17:29 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-23 14:06 Re: Register Allocation

Michael N. Moran

• 2005-11-14 18:47 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 20:55 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:02 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:09 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:17 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:21 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 21:27 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 22:17 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 22:28 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 02:19 Re: Null pointer check elimination

Michael Trimarchi

• 2005-11-14 16:52 arm sof float
• 2005-11-14 17:17 Re: arm sof float

Mike Hearn

• 2005-11-19 17:30 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal

Mike Lerwill

• 2005-11-10 11:51 Incorrect default options for h8300 target

Mike Stump

• 2005-11-02 08:46 Re: Shared libraries
• 2005-11-02 08:55 Re: A question about memcpy
• 2005-11-02 20:41 Re: weird installation problem on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-02 22:33 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 19:24 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 20:03 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-07 20:09 Re: \n to \r\n in stdout
• 2005-11-07 23:46 Re: copyright assignement
• 2005-11-11 21:49 Re: [gfortran] Second try: Problem parsing hexadecimal constants?
• 2005-11-12 00:08 darwin building ppc64 libjava?
• 2005-11-12 00:28 Re: darwin building ppc64 libjava?
• 2005-11-13 02:04 Re: Adding the D programming language
• 2005-11-13 22:43 Re: Runtime Memory Usage Graph
• 2005-11-14 20:42 Re: should_duplicate_loop_header_p and volatile asm statements
• 2005-11-14 20:52 Re: Add revision number to gcc version?
• 2005-11-15 18:40 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-18 18:15 Re: GCC 4.1/4.2 Status Report (2005-11-18)
• 2005-11-18 18:30 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 18:35 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 18:43 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-27 03:14 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-27 03:18 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-27 06:34 Re: Would Like to Contribute, Where to Start?
• 2005-11-27 07:59 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-28 17:11 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 17:14 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 17:22 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 17:35 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 17:44 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 17:53 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 18:14 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 18:28 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 19:53 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 19:56 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 20:25 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 20:48 Re: Warning bug with -fPIC? (was Re: Some testsuite cleanups (mostly for -fPIC))
• 2005-11-28 21:55 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-29 01:57 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 03:36 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 03:38 Re: port of the LLVM patch to the trunk
• 2005-11-29 20:12 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 20:41 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-29 20:54 Re: Performance regression testing?
• 2005-11-30 22:53 Re: SVN conversion glitch?
• 2005-11-30 23:04 Re: gcc help

Nathan Sidwell

• 2005-11-18 17:24 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-24 07:58 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-24 07:59 Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
• 2005-11-28 09:11 Re: How implemented "typeof"

Nathanael Nerode

• 2005-11-02 00:29 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Canadian Cross Compile

Neil Booth

• 2005-11-01 11:49 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-02 23:26 Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• 2005-11-18 11:01 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-21 22:52 Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-27 23:23 Re: 20040309-1.c vs overflow being undefined

Nemanja Popov

• 2005-11-22 12:05 unable to find a register to spill in class

nesotto

• 2005-11-01 21:47 [G++] Implementing a C++0x standard proprosal (Design by Contract)

Nicholas Nethercote

• 2005-11-21 17:58 Re: Abnormal behavior of malloc in gcc-3.2.2
• 2005-11-29 17:17 Re: Performance regression testing?

Olatunji Ruwase

• 2005-11-10 00:57 Lowering return statements in gimple pass

Osku Salerma

• 2005-11-16 13:35 Re: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch

Panagiotis Papadakos

• 2005-11-19 17:44 Can't build 4.1 branch on Linux x86
• 2005-11-19 17:49 Re: Can't build 4.1 branch on Linux x86
• 2005-11-19 20:11 Re: Can't build 4.1 branch on Linux x86

Pankaj Gupta

• 2005-11-18 21:47 Incompatible behavior -O0, -O3, std::cout
• 2005-11-18 22:04 Re: Incompatible behavior -O0, -O3, std::cout

Paolo Bonzini

• 2005-11-03 10:44 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 12:09 Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking
• 2005-11-03 12:14 Re: Patch reviews for 4.1
• 2005-11-03 16:42 Re: cross newlib builds on svn head
• 2005-11-04 07:52 Re: toplevel Makefile.tpl hacking
• 2005-11-04 19:08 Re: GCC-generated code and i386 condition codes behavior
• 2005-11-08 08:16 svn feature request: print URL in diff output
• 2005-11-08 10:22 Re: svn feature request: print URL in diff output
• 2005-11-09 12:43 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-09 16:49 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-11 09:10 Re: UNITS vs. BYTES
• 2005-11-14 12:51 Re: cross builds to avr fail
• 2005-11-15 18:48 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 20:41 Re: 10 Nov notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call
• 2005-11-15 21:28 Re: Bogus testcase?
• 2005-11-20 18:38 Re: Somebody broke bootstrap on trunk for x86_64
• 2005-11-24 15:28 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-28 13:09 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-29 08:18 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 22:28 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-30 12:43 Re: SVN Problem?
• 2005-11-30 13:12 Re: s390{,x} ABI incompatibility between gcc 4.0 and 4.1

Paolo Carlini

• 2005-11-02 15:57 Library commits vs Bugzilla
• 2005-11-02 16:20 Re: Library commits vs Bugzilla
• 2005-11-06 10:34 Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 11:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 11:43 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 14:12 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 18:42 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 18:56 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:19 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:34 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:46 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:54 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 20:14 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 21:11 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 00:35 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 01:24 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 01:33 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 02:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 10:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 10:08 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 10:10 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 10:14 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 10:29 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 10:41 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 10:45 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 11:19 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 15:58 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 16:33 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-08 11:16 __gcc_cpu_feature
• 2005-11-08 12:25 Re: __gcc_cpu_feature
• 2005-11-21 16:18 Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-21 17:30 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-21 17:34 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla

Pascal Aschwanden

• 2005-11-02 20:44 What are the differences between 2.95.3 and 3.2.3?

pati (sent by Nabble.com)

• 2005-11-30 22:40 gcc help

Paul Albrecht

• 2005-11-16 18:00 gcc cross-reference
• 2005-11-17 23:05 question about gcc
• 2005-11-18 00:25 Re: question about gcc
• 2005-11-18 00:46 Re: question about gcc

Paul Brook

• 2005-11-03 00:24 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-12 18:44 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 22:05 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-13 00:18 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-16 15:03 Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses
• 2005-11-17 15:12 Re: m68k does not build on head
• 2005-11-17 15:32 Re: m68k does not build on head
• 2005-11-20 01:03 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-22 16:22 Re: Copies of the GCC repository
• 2005-11-23 18:56 [RFC] fixproto and canadian cross builds
• 2005-11-29 02:03 Re: Performance regression testing?

Paul Jarc

• 2005-11-30 15:41 Re: Suggestion

Paul Thomas

• 2005-11-01 11:59 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined.

Per Bothner

• 2005-11-01 16:41 Re: resolving backslash newline whisky tango foxtrot: a proposal
• 2005-11-03 07:28 Re: Patch reviews for 4.1
• 2005-11-12 17:05 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 17:27 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 18:47 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 19:35 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 21:11 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-12 21:14 Re: Null pointer check elimination

Peter Bergner

• 2005-11-22 19:26 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-22 22:58 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-23 20:50 Re: Register Allocation

Peter Dimov

• 2005-11-06 20:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

Peter S. Mazinger

• 2005-11-08 20:34 apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-15 06:45 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-15 06:57 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-15 07:41 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-15 20:01 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-16 19:40 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-16 21:02 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-16 21:33 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-17 07:17 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-17 12:54 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault

Peter Zijlstra

• 2005-11-24 09:19 problems bootstrapping gcc-4.0-20051117 on i386-pc-solaris2.10

Phil Edwards

• 2005-11-04 00:05 Re: diffing directories with merged-as-deleted files?
• 2005-11-25 14:28 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?
• 2005-11-25 21:16 Re: [C++] Should the complexity of std::list::size() be O(n) or O(1)?

Pierre-Matthieu anglade

• 2005-11-05 18:29 copyright assignement
• 2005-11-08 07:39 Re: copyright assignement

Piotr Wyderski

• 2005-11-18 12:25 Target processor detection

Prateek Saxena

• 2005-11-18 09:13 Code getting optimized away after instrumenation for memory analysis
• 2005-11-18 19:23 Re: Code getting optimized away after instrumenation for memory analysis

Rafael Ávila de Espíndola

• 2005-11-12 12:03 can DECL_RESULT be 0?
• 2005-11-15 21:30 Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0?
• 2005-11-15 21:43 Re: [Treelang] flag_signed_char
• 2005-11-20 19:58 Re: can DECL_RESULT be 0?
• 2005-11-24 12:39 should _GNU_SOURCE be used in libiberty if glibc is present?
• 2005-11-29 03:02 port of the LLVM patch to the trunk
• 2005-11-29 10:53 Re: port of the LLVM patch to the trunk
• 2005-11-30 01:33 Re: LLVM patch X function lowering

Rainer Emrich

• 2005-11-16 16:04 Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-18 08:38 Results for 4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) testsuite on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
• 2005-11-18 08:49 Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
• 2005-11-18 08:51 Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2005-11-18 08:53 Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on i686-pc-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-18 08:54 Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-18 08:59 failed to run testsuite for libstdc++ on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnufor target unix/-m32
• 2005-11-18 17:43 Successfull build of gcc-4.1.0 20051112 (experimental) on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
• 2005-11-22 13:44 Re: failed to run testsuite for libstdc++ on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu for target unix/-m32

Ralf Corsepius

• 2005-11-21 17:26 Re: Ada on ARM
• 2005-11-22 02:52 Re: Ada on ARM

Ralf Wildenhues

• 2005-11-06 08:48 Re: Problem with commas in macro parameters

Ranjit Mathew

• 2005-11-09 07:18 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-09 14:27 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry

Razya Ladelsky

• 2005-11-13 11:17 Re: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-5.c

Redefined Horizons

• 2005-11-10 01:08 Second Try: Assembly Programmer Contributions

Richard Earnshaw

• 2005-11-14 17:03 Re: arm sof float
• 2005-11-14 17:21 Re: arm sof float
• 2005-11-17 10:27 Re: Cirrus arm Maverick Crunch fixes
• 2005-11-17 11:41 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-18 11:29 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-22 10:45 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-22 15:52 RE: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-23 11:27 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-23 12:04 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-24 11:00 Re: Creating a partial mirror of the repository with SVK
• 2005-11-28 11:01 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)

Richard Guenther

• 2005-11-04 11:31 ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 13:34 [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 14:45 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 14:46 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 15:16 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 15:37 Re: F77 code under gcc
• 2005-11-04 16:34 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-05 18:41 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 19:04 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 10:43 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 10:52 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 13:50 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:16 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 08:03 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 08:06 Re: no warning being displayed.
• 2005-11-07 09:50 Re: no warning being displayed.
• 2005-11-07 10:24 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 10:40 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 11:15 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-08 12:16 Re: __gcc_cpu_feature
• 2005-11-12 20:31 cross builds to avr fail
• 2005-11-12 21:34 Re: cross builds to avr fail
• 2005-11-13 09:26 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 09:54 Re: inline-unit-growth tweek
• 2005-11-14 10:28 Re: Change in order of evaluation in 4.0.2
• 2005-11-15 19:17 Re: 10 Nov notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call
• 2005-11-16 14:23 Re: Question about mudflap
• 2005-11-16 16:26 Re: ultrasparc3 optimisation
• 2005-11-18 13:43 Re: Issue with find_tail_calls
• 2005-11-19 10:09 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-19 17:48 Re: Can't build 4.1 branch on Linux x86
• 2005-11-19 22:10 Somebody broke bootstrap on trunk for x86_64
• 2005-11-22 09:53 Re: Target processor detection
• 2005-11-25 09:45 Re: svn speed traversing slow filesystems
• 2005-11-25 18:47 Running testsuite with extra --param argument
• 2005-11-29 21:08 [RFH] Restrict support for trees
• 2005-11-29 22:50 Re: [RFH] Restrict support for trees

Richard Henderson

• 2005-11-01 22:49 Re: [gfortran] fortran preprocessing, round 2
• 2005-11-02 17:40 Re: [gfortran] fortran preprocessing, round 2
• 2005-11-03 00:09 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-03 01:46 Re: [cft] aligning main's stack frame
• 2005-11-06 18:52 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 19:32 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 20:47 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-06 23:37 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 01:11 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 08:46 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 08:47 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 08:50 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-16 19:07 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-16 19:19 Re: dwarf2 basic block start information
• 2005-11-16 19:59 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-16 20:07 Re: Delay branch scheduling vs. the CFG
• 2005-11-16 20:20 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-16 21:05 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-16 22:05 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-17 01:20 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 18:59 Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
• 2005-11-17 19:13 Re: Is there a GIMPLE equivalent of UNSPEC?
• 2005-11-17 22:56 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-17 23:09 Re: pruning unused debugging types (enums/PR23336)
• 2005-11-17 23:20 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-17 23:25 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-18 01:06 Re: [RFC] PR/24900: computed but not used cast values
• 2005-11-18 01:07 Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses
• 2005-11-18 20:34 Re: Pragma callback to insert text in input buffer?
• 2005-11-18 21:21 Re: Issue with find_tail_calls
• 2005-11-19 01:48 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-19 01:55 Re: Issue with find_tail_calls
• 2005-11-19 21:26 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-21 17:08 Re: improved ia64 atomic ops
• 2005-11-21 17:55 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-22 18:50 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 19:06 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-26 22:16 Re: ppc-linux and s390-linux compilers requiring 64-bit HWI?
• 2005-11-27 18:50 Re: 20040309-1.c vs overflow being undefined
• 2005-11-29 19:21 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-29 21:02 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c
• 2005-11-30 19:57 Re: Torbjorn's ieeelib.c

Richard Kenner

• 2005-11-03 03:56 Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
• 2005-11-04 13:41 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 14:29 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-04 15:03 Re: [PATCH] Re: ref_contains_indirect_ref always false?
• 2005-11-14 00:06 Re: Ada ACATS status
• 2005-11-15 02:20 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-18 13:37 Issue with find_tail_calls
• 2005-11-18 13:54 Re: Issue with find_tail_calls
• 2005-11-19 01:07 Re: Issue with find_tail_calls
• 2005-11-22 16:16 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 17:28 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 18:50 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-29 02:28 Re: Performance regression testing?

Robert Dewar

• 2005-11-04 17:27 Re: GCC-generated code and i386 condition codes behavior
• 2005-11-04 19:11 Re: GCC-generated code and i386 condition codes behavior
• 2005-11-05 17:57 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 18:11 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 18:13 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 00:12 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 00:25 Re: GCC-generated code and i386 condition codes behavior
• 2005-11-06 02:57 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 02:59 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 14:16 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 14:18 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 14:18 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 14:20 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-13 09:33 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-14 00:28 Re: Adding the D programming language
• 2005-11-14 04:09 Re: Adding the D programming language
• 2005-11-17 23:10 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-17 23:20 Re: question about gcc
• 2005-11-18 11:19 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-21 21:50 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-21 22:27 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-21 22:57 Re: SV: Re: MISRA C support for GCC?
• 2005-11-22 16:10 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-22 18:38 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-22 19:10 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-23 00:08 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-23 11:41 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-23 12:15 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 11:13 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 19:05 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 19:12 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 20:01 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 20:21 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-28 22:26 Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
• 2005-11-30 15:37 Re: Suggestion

Romain Failliot

• 2005-11-13 01:06 Adding the D programming language
• 2005-11-13 22:44 Re: Adding the D programming language
• 2005-11-14 00:45 Re: Adding the D programming language

Rui Wang

• 2005-11-08 13:50 Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-09 08:54 RE: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-09 18:24 RE: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-10 12:22 RE: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-10 14:10 RE: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-11 00:29 RE: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry

Russ Allbery

• 2005-11-22 23:43 Re: Copies of the GCC repository

Ryan Mansfield

• 2005-11-02 20:47 RE: What are the differences between 2.95.3 and 3.2.3?

Sandeep Kumar

• 2005-11-21 04:58 Abnormal behavior of malloc in gcc-3.2.2
• 2005-11-21 05:14 Re: Abnormal behavior of malloc in gcc-3.2.2
• 2005-11-21 05:23 Re: Abnormal behavior of malloc in gcc-3.2.2

Scott Gilbertson

• 2005-11-18 23:18 dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-21 17:09 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?
• 2005-11-22 23:35 Re: dwarf2 unwinder hacks get my static build going: Bug, or indication of what I'm doing wrong?

Scott Robert Ladd

• 2005-11-22 18:03 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 20:19 Re: Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO)
• 2005-11-23 00:30 Re: Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO)
• 2005-11-25 02:17 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO

sean yang

• 2005-11-01 01:08 dump CFG and callgraph

Sebastian Pop

• 2005-11-21 13:22 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-21 16:58 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla
• 2005-11-21 17:53 Re: Stupid issue with Bugzilla

shreyas krishnan

• 2005-11-26 02:14 Alias analysis of parameters

Simon Wright

• 2005-11-22 22:39 Broken link to documentation

Softish soft

• 2005-11-02 08:31 Shared libraries

Steve Ellcey

• 2005-11-08 19:31 Re: Re: Does gcc-3.4.3 for HP-UX 11.23/IA-64 work?

Steve Kargl

• 2005-11-04 15:07 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-04 17:22 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-19 15:23 Overwrite a file with "svn update"?
• 2005-11-19 20:16 Re: Overwrite a file with "svn update"?
• 2005-11-19 20:24 Re: Overwrite a file with "svn update"?

Steven Bosscher

• 2005-11-01 12:15 Re: insufficient inline optimisation?
• 2005-11-01 13:49 Re: insufficient inline optimisation?
• 2005-11-01 19:39 Re: Bug in install of gfortran for gcc-4.0.2
• 2005-11-05 18:02 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 18:28 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-05 19:46 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-06 01:13 Re: [RFC] Enabling loop unrolls at -O3?
• 2005-11-07 19:34 [RFC] What should be the semantics of a zero-bit bit-field with pragma pack?
• 2005-11-11 16:53 CSiBE compile time improvement
• 2005-11-13 18:20 Where is TARGET_EXPLICIT_RELOCS defined for MIPS?
• 2005-11-13 20:20 Delay branch scheduling vs. the CFG
• 2005-11-13 21:20 Re: Delay branch scheduling vs. the CFG
• 2005-11-14 09:34 Re: should_duplicate_loop_header_p and volatile asm statements
• 2005-11-14 12:14 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken
• 2005-11-15 20:01 Re: 10 Nov notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call
• 2005-11-16 13:46 Re: New branch: ia64-improvements-branch
• 2005-11-16 20:39 Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses
• 2005-11-17 12:21 Re: Is there a GIMPLE equivalent of UNSPEC?
• 2005-11-17 15:54 Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses
• 2005-11-18 00:19 Re: [rfc] new tree-codes/optabs for vectorization of non-unit-stride accesses
• 2005-11-18 17:04 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-20 00:37 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-20 00:40 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-20 00:54 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-22 16:57 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 21:55 Re: Register Allocation
• 2005-11-22 22:02 Re: Some GCC 4.1 benchmarks (Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO)
• 2005-11-22 22:06 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 22:15 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 22:19 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO
• 2005-11-22 22:51 Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO

Steven Woody

• 2005-11-13 07:38 How Can I Get See A Memory Map For An Executable
• 2005-11-13 07:43 Runtime Memory Usage Graph
• 2005-11-13 09:31 How Can I Get See A Memory Map For An Executable

thales

• 2005-11-07 11:39 \n to \r\n in stdout
• 2005-11-07 12:04 Subscribing the mailing list

Thomas Quinot

• 2005-11-17 22:32 Re: Ada Broken with h_errno change
• 2005-11-18 17:32 Re: Ada Broken with h_errno change
• 2005-11-21 15:33 Re: Ada Broken with h_errno change

Till Straumann

• 2005-11-02 00:49 powerpc/rs6000 implicit FPU usage

TJ Laurenzo

• 2005-11-09 14:21 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-09 14:32 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-10 21:00 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-10 21:05 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry

Tobias . Schlueter

• 2005-11-01 13:02 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined.
• 2005-11-01 14:37 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined.
• 2005-11-04 17:29 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries

Tom Tromey

• 2005-11-09 17:09 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-09 20:13 Re: Cross compile, no grmic/grmiregistry
• 2005-11-12 20:33 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 16:41 Re: Null pointer check elimination
• 2005-11-15 16:46 Re: Java on uClinux (was: Null pointer check elimination)
• 2005-11-17 00:52 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-28 20:35 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal
• 2005-11-28 20:49 Re: LLVM/GCC Integration Proposal

Toon Moene

• 2005-11-01 12:37 Re: Vectorizing HIRLAM 4: complicated access patterns examined.

Ulrich Drepper

• 2005-11-06 21:13 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 15:20 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 15:42 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 15:59 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3
• 2005-11-07 16:25 Re: Call for compiler help/advice: atomic builtins for v3

Ulrich Weigand

• 2005-11-17 13:08 Re: Link-time optimzation
• 2005-11-25 18:21 Re: LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS vs address_reloaded
• 2005-11-28 03:39 Re: ppc-linux and s390-linux compilers requiring 64-bit HWI?

Unruh, Erwin

• 2005-11-17 12:12 Is there a GIMPLE equivalent of UNSPEC?
• 2005-11-17 13:18 RE: Is there a GIMPLE equivalent of UNSPEC?

Uros Bizjak

• 2005-11-08 10:20 Re: svn feature request: print URL in diff output
• 2005-11-15 15:41 'gcc -whatever' unrecognized option returns 0
• 2005-11-24 12:39 Re: overcoming info build failures

VIbhav Garg

• 2005-11-20 20:07 Creating temporary variables
• 2005-11-21 05:58 Re: Creating temporary variables

Vincent Lefevre

• 2005-11-04 12:34 Re: timezone of svn server for -r?
• 2005-11-04 12:46 Re: svn url shortcuts
• 2005-11-04 17:28 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries
• 2005-11-04 17:32 Re: Build using --with-gmp and shared libraries

Vivaldo

• 2005-11-01 12:20 possible problem with long double

Walter Zimmer

• 2005-11-22 14:26 Build results for gcc 4.0.2 on SuSE 9.2

william . franck

• 2005-11-17 21:36 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.2 on MacOS-X 10.3.9
• 2005-11-17 23:52 Build failed gcc-4.1.0-20051112 on MacOS-X 10.3.9
• 2005-11-24 06:48 Successfull build & install of gcc-4.0.2 on MacOS-X 10.3.9-520.19

YaniMan

• 2005-11-30 15:32 Suggestion

ÈĺÒÁ¦ÆǸÅ

• 2005-11-15 06:07 ¸Çü½ºÅÍ À¯³ªÀÌƼµå ¿îµ¿º¹ ±¹³»ÃÖÀú°¡ ¼±Âø¼ø ÈĺÒÁ¦ ÆǸÅÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)