This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Link-time optimzation

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:30:51 -0800
Subject: Re: Link-time optimzation
References: <437BB214.1070306@codesourcery.com> <20051117011900.GA17847@redhat.com> <437BDC9E.3080608@codesourcery.com> <1132227692.24110.40.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <m3psoz0x95.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <437D0DC7.7040509@adacore.com>

On Nov 17, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Robert Dewar wrote:

I never like arguments which have loaded words like "lot" without
quantification. Just how long *is* spent in this step, is it really
significant?

as is 2-3% as I recall (Finder_FE C++) of total build time.

References:
- Link-time optimzation
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Link-time optimzation
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Link-time optimzation
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Link-time optimzation
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: Link-time optimzation
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Link-time optimzation
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]