This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:22:53 -0800
Subject: Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
References: <m3y83eq3oz.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <43850DC6.8010604@codesourcery.com> <m3sltmq2ez.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Assuming the extension was gone, do you see a reason we not move the
> default arguments to FUNCTION_DECLs and have FUNCTION_TYPEs use
> TREE_VEC instead of TREE_LIST to hold the parameter-type list?

Both things sound OK to me.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]