This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:59:54 +0000
Subject: Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
References: <m3y83eq3oz.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <43850DC6.8010604@codesourcery.com> <m3sltmq2ez.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

Assuming the extension was gone, do you see a reason we not move the
default arguments to FUNCTION_DECLs and have FUNCTION_TYPEs use
TREE_VEC instead of TREE_LIST to hold the parameter-type list?

you could probably use a VEC(tree), which I think would be even better :)

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Default arguments and FUNCTION_TYPEs
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]