This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps dot m at gmx dot net>
Cc: James E Wilson <wilson at specifix dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:07:25 -0800
Subject: Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
References: <1132082418.14486.60.camel@aretha.corp.specifix.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0511152055320.28778-100000@lnx.bridge.intra>

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:01:21PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> I meant exactly this, gcc supports -fno-stack-protector (although gcc 
> defaults to no-ssp), so -fno-stack-protector-all should be there too

Why?  What option would it perform?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
  - From: Peter S. Mazinger

References:
- Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
  - From: Peter S. Mazinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]