This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
- From: "Peter S. Mazinger" <ps dot m at gmx dot net>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: James E Wilson <wilson at specifix dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:40:11 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:01:21PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > I meant exactly this, gcc supports -fno-stack-protector (although gcc
> > defaults to no-ssp), so -fno-stack-protector-all should be there too
>
> Why? What option would it perform?
to have the possibility to override an earlier one, as it is done w/ many
fno* options. Why should this one not have it's counterpart.
Ex. gcc does not default to fomit-frame-pointer, but we have
fno-omit-frame-pointer
Peter
--
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2