This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch reviews for 4.1
- From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:28:31 -0800
- Subject: Re: Patch reviews for 4.1
- References: <4369B8B0.3080208@codesourcery.com>
Mark Mitchell wrote:
This rather horrid URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.1&target_milestone=4.0.3&target_milestone=4.1.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&gcchost_type=allwordssubstr&gcchost=&gcctarget_type=allwordssubstr&gcctarget=&gccbuild_type=allwordssubstr&gccbuild=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=patch&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=SUSPENDED&bug_status=WAITING&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
will get you the list of 4.1 PRs with the "patch" keyword set. Fixing
these PRs may just require than an appropriate person review the patches.
Per, there's one preprocessor patch below; would you please take a look?
The rest are middle-end patches.
Preprocessor
------------
22042
I don't know enough about fine points of the standard to say what is
right. If you and Andrew think it is right, I'm ok with it.
--
--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/