This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
- From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:08:19 -0800
- Subject: Re: Why doesn't combine like volatiles? (volatile_ok again, sorry!)
- References: <200511281741.jASHf9Bc001892@earth.phy.uc.edu> <C87CBF81-389C-4360-A9BE-5835857EAD1B@apple.com>
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:53:31AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >Huh? they are not carefully written at all. This is why I said what
> >is GNU C? Again the language is not written out so it means anything.
>
> So then clearly, since it means anything, we can change gcc to accept
> pascal instead of C? Right? This is absurd.
Mike, you wrote "GNU C", not "ISO C". There's no spec for the former.