gcc archive
author index for March, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

王逸

2004-03-21 01:59 about RTL
2004-03-31 11:09 [RTL] -- How to insert code into functions?

王逸

2004-03-21 02:04 About RTL

Danny Smith

2004-03-02 20:45 Re: RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c

김명수

2004-03-16 02:45 Question !!
2004-03-24 10:51 Any Question

이규호

2004-03-09 02:52 GCC3.3.3 Successful build in ia64-hpux11.23(hp rx5670)

Administrator

2004-03-16 19:50 Undeliverable Email

Al Stone

2004-03-01 01:12 Munging gcc-testresults@ messages
2004-03-01 01:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

Alan Modra

2004-03-22 06:03 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc

Albert Chin

2004-03-10 04:47 C++ language lawyer question

Aldy Hernandez

2004-03-01 04:20 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4
2004-03-07 18:30 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-07 18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?
2004-03-07 23:22 ppc LE broken. anybody care?
2004-03-25 22:05 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4
2004-03-25 22:54 invalid_mode_change_p again...

Alex Rosenberg

2004-03-15 02:29 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-18 21:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops

Alexandre Oliva

2004-03-01 07:05 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-03-02 16:59 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-02 22:54 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 00:27 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 00:30 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 00:31 Re: g++ 3.5.0 and tree-ssa parse problem: incomplete types
2004-03-03 03:53 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 16:49 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-08 22:21 Re: LD vs multilibs
2004-03-09 18:59 Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59
2004-03-20 04:53 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-21 16:55 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-21 17:00 make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed
2004-03-22 00:49 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-23 00:37 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-24 02:42 Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed
2004-03-29 02:21 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern.

Allan Sandfeld

2004-03-01 09:17 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?

Andi Kleen

2004-03-06 12:58 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly
2004-03-06 18:41 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly
2004-03-06 19:38 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly
2004-03-27 06:02 Re: Register Allocation

Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci

2004-03-31 23:48 Re: Exception handling HowTO??

Andreas Jaeger

2004-03-01 06:00 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 19:51 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-13 16:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-15 06:06 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 06:45 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and streeversion of enumerators
2004-03-18 10:18 license of libmudflap?
2004-03-19 05:46 Re: license of libmudflap?
2004-03-21 15:35 Re: 128-bit long long?
2004-03-21 17:37 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc
2004-03-26 07:27 Re: new apple-ppc branch

Andreas Schwab

2004-03-01 22:30 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-03 11:03 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-04 22:46 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-08 22:57 Re: Shebang
2004-03-09 21:29 Re: handling of FIXED_REGISTERS
2004-03-12 09:57 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-12 22:24 Re: signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-15 22:14 Re: signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-15 22:18 Re: signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-18 10:45 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]
2004-03-20 13:59 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-21 17:22 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-28 18:40 Re: Warning on cast to const
2004-03-30 09:46 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization

Andreas Tobler

2004-03-15 19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status

Andrew Haley

2004-03-01 14:45 gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue
2004-03-02 10:19 [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory
2004-03-03 10:04 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue
2004-03-05 14:47 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue
2004-03-10 18:31 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-15 15:36 PR java/14581: gcj internal error: Segmentation fault involving switch to a final var
2004-03-17 12:00 Savannah down
2004-03-17 12:02 Newb question about code style
2004-03-17 12:43 RE: Savannah down
2004-03-29 17:47 Re: GPL legal question
2004-03-31 09:09 Re: Floating Point Exception Handling

Andrew MacLeod

2004-03-17 17:09 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-25 19:51 [tree-ssa] Debugging information issue.
2004-03-26 12:42 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 13:34 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 15:39 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 20:18 Re: Register Allocation

Andrew Pinski

2004-03-01 00:43 gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 03:00 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4
2004-03-01 08:12 Re: Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location
2004-03-04 07:08 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?
2004-03-04 18:07 Re: Logging data structure field accesses
2004-03-04 20:12 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-04 23:34 Re: PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
2004-03-06 19:26 Re: Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for over a week.
2004-03-07 23:52 Re: Framework support for Linux
2004-03-10 04:45 Re: [tree-ssa] abort in stabilize_call
2004-03-14 19:22 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-15 00:12 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-16 16:45 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-17 06:05 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-03-19 21:40 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-19 22:44 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-20 23:56 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-21 00:36 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-23 19:58 Re: darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem
2004-03-24 05:38 Re: Making -ffast-math more fine-grained?
2004-03-26 02:01 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-27 15:38 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-29 06:36 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-30 05:59 Re: Should fold preserve types?
2004-03-31 13:37 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)

Andris Pavenis

2004-03-17 09:10 Re: Building collect2 for C?

Aniket S Joshi

2004-03-26 12:24 GCC: structure typedef compilation error

Anil Paranjape

2004-03-23 09:55 RE: ABI Document
2004-03-30 06:13 Ping : H8/300 ABI Document

anonymous NFS user

2004-03-16 09:02 The account for daniele has been removed [Re: Re: excuse me]

Arnaud Charlet

2004-03-04 08:01 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 09:35 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 09:36 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 17:11 Re: Why doesn't Ada testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-18 09:11 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 07:53 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 09:18 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 13:08 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 16:28 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-23 07:38 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-23 11:29 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-23 22:10 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-25 08:18 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 08:46 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 11:31 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 12:43 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-27 11:25 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?

Arnold Vogelsang

2004-03-18 12:54 Successful build of gcc-3.3.3 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f

Arpad Beszedes

2004-03-03 12:39 [gnu.org #27612] Request for copyright assignment form

Art Haas

2004-03-24 21:44 No luck building GCC on sparc-linux using --with-gc=zone

Ashok.A

2004-03-03 14:44 Clarification Req: Regarding "+m" constraints in inline asm
2004-03-26 06:34 Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)
2004-03-27 07:28 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)
2004-03-30 17:36 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)
2004-03-31 07:43 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)

Ayal Zaks

2004-03-30 15:09 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC

Balaji Srinivasa

2004-03-18 16:38 Compiling gcc 3.3.3 on solaris 2.6
2004-03-18 18:40 RE: Compiling gcc 3.3.3 on solaris 2.6
2004-03-19 02:30 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 14:14 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 18:31 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 20:04 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 21:57 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 22:06 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 22:18 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-22 14:12 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7

Barry Wealand

2004-03-22 23:39 Operator overloading in (MIPS) assembly-language
2004-03-25 23:29 Disqualifying instructions for branch delay slot scheduling

Bauke van Dijk

2004-03-24 21:07 Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.
2004-03-24 22:20 [Fwd: Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.]
2004-03-25 18:32 Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.
2004-03-25 18:46 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests

Ben Elliston

2004-03-25 06:40 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering

Benjamin Kosnik

2004-03-09 03:43 Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59

Bernardo Innocenti

2004-03-02 00:07 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-02 00:18 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-03 08:22 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-03 08:53 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-03 22:38 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-04 13:27 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-07 15:05 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-08 21:38 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-08 21:45 Re: You ucLinux patches break RTEMS building
2004-03-09 22:35 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-20 03:46 m68k-linux regressions
2004-03-21 21:42 Re: m68k-linux regressions
2004-03-22 01:27 Re: m68k-linux regressions

Bernd Jendrissek

2004-03-17 15:18 Re: Newb question about code style
2004-03-26 07:08 Re: Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ?

Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)

2004-03-22 00:12 RE: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)

Bonzini

2004-03-19 16:10 Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass

Bradley Lucier

2004-03-24 18:22 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 18:56 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 02:55 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-26 02:41 Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add.
2004-03-26 02:51 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering

Bruce Korb

2004-03-19 04:42 [For "zlomek": Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]

Cedric Berger

2004-03-15 15:40 Re: PR java/14581: gcj internal error: Segmentation fault involvingswitch to a final var

cgd

2004-03-05 16:19 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2
2004-03-08 22:24 Re: Shebang
2004-03-08 22:37 Re: Shebang
2004-03-08 22:51 Re: Shebang

Cheng, Cheuk

2004-03-01 19:03 RE: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 19:05 RE: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final (sorry, wrong subject)
2004-03-10 22:01 new/delete mismatch

Choa-lin Chou

2004-03-25 00:11 Successful bootstrap: gcc-3.3.3/sparc-sun-solaris2.9

Chris Lattner

2004-03-01 19:34 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 22:21 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 23:58 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-16 03:46 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-17 16:40 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-18 20:45 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness
2004-03-18 20:55 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness
2004-03-20 05:00 LLVM 1.2 Release!
2004-03-26 20:15 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-26 20:19 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-29 01:39 RE: Double abstract class Inheritance concern.

Chris Proctor

2004-03-25 08:28 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 12:03 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 20:16 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 20:46 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests

Christian Ehrhardt

2004-03-30 09:14 Re: GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches

Christian Groessler

2004-03-12 21:25 signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-14 18:09 Re: signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-15 22:02 Re: signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-15 22:24 Re: signed/unsigned right shift

Christian Joensson

2004-03-01 08:06 Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location
2004-03-09 16:17 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459: warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function
2004-03-09 16:20 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459: warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function
2004-03-09 18:49 genrecog of i386.md under linux, 5 warnings...
2004-03-15 06:56 gctest failure for 3.5-tree-ssa 20040314 (merged 20040307) on cygwin: KERNEL32!IsBadWritePtr
2004-03-23 14:27 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-27 12:25 [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
2004-03-28 06:38 Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc.
2004-03-29 06:27 Re: Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc.

Christopher Faylor

2004-03-01 15:51 Re: Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location
2004-03-01 20:33 Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project
2004-03-12 18:35 Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0

Chuck Cox

2004-03-04 17:53 Successful bootstrap: 3.3.3/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9 (64-bit)

clifford

2004-03-28 10:52 Warning on cast to const
2004-03-28 13:50 Re: Warning on cast to const

Cyrille Chepelov

2004-03-05 20:26 [reload] never-used stack slots?

d-loop

2004-03-20 09:06 D-loop : new way for optimizing loop with branch condition

d9910490

2004-03-23 00:18 simplejump_p does not recognise jumps in parallel rtx

Dale Johannesen

2004-03-01 21:02 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 21:48 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-03 00:23 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 00:39 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 18:44 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-04 18:38 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-05 00:23 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-08 22:46 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 00:07 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-12 22:37 Re: signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-16 19:43 Re: RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations?
2004-03-18 17:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-19 18:57 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-19 22:12 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-19 22:54 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-23 19:23 Re: output binary
2004-03-24 19:43 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:45 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 17:58 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-25 18:18 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus
2004-03-26 01:29 [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 01:58 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 18:08 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 18:22 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-27 00:48 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering

Dan Kegel

2004-03-25 06:07 re: [c++] Missing strstream.h

Dan Nicolaescu

2004-03-12 17:18 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-12 18:17 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-15 02:22 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 18:22 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-25 19:19 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)

Daniel Berlin

2004-03-01 04:15 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 21:40 Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...)
2004-03-01 21:41 Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...)
2004-03-02 23:24 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-12 15:58 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-14 22:31 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-15 02:07 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 02:31 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 18:49 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 19:46 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 22:19 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-19 16:46 Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com
2004-03-21 21:02 DOM doesn't notice some equivalences through phis
2004-03-23 18:48 Re: Request for bugzilla submitters/maintainers: "Reportad against"field
2004-03-25 20:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Debugging information issue.
2004-03-26 05:12 Adding ggc_free to htab_create_ggc macro?
2004-03-30 22:02 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-31 23:53 cc1 of nonexistent file still segfaults

Daniel Egger

2004-03-26 22:21 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!

Daniel Jacobowitz

2004-03-01 01:29 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-03-01 03:07 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-04 21:46 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 21:46 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases
2004-03-23 16:10 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-23 17:25 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-25 20:42 Should ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN honor __attribute__((packed))?
2004-03-31 15:31 Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)

Daniel Kegel

2004-03-04 23:19 PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expressionin ".if" statement
2004-03-04 23:38 Re: PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expressionin ".if" statement

Daniel Towner

2004-03-31 10:49 Handling DWARF call frame labels in the middle of VLIW packets

Dave Korn

2004-03-16 10:20 RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-16 12:43 RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-16 13:21 RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-17 11:49 Savannah down
2004-03-17 12:35 RE: Savannah down
2004-03-17 12:38 RE: Warning on dangerous use of assert() ?
2004-03-17 12:51 RE: Newb question about code style
2004-03-17 19:19 Oh my god, it's full of NULLs
2004-03-18 10:14 RE: Oh my god, it's full of NULLs
2004-03-18 13:43 RE: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 14:40 Heads up re: shared register rtx in regno_reg_rtx
2004-03-18 17:25 RE: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-19 15:30 How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-19 16:47 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-19 17:05 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-19 17:55 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-22 12:45 RE: malloc mutex and exceptions
2004-03-22 15:05 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-24 18:50 String optimisations gone?
2004-03-24 18:58 RE: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 17:47 RE: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-25 18:09 RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus
2004-03-25 18:28 RE: Register objects question
2004-03-26 11:20 RE: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-26 13:06 RE: structure typedef compilation error
2004-03-29 10:30 RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus
2004-03-31 17:32 RE: problems with subversions.gcc.org

Dave Murphy

2004-03-07 02:57 gcc and arm interworking
2004-03-09 08:03 RE: gcc and arm interworking
2004-03-16 16:25 powerpc-*-elf versus powerpc-*-eabi
2004-03-16 16:42 RE: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 17:14 RE: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 22:20 RE: Building collect2 for C?

David Addison

2004-03-04 22:51 Help with writing RTL for RISC CPU

David Daney

2004-03-02 19:02 PCH and exec-shield...

David Edelsohn

2004-03-03 17:52 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-05 03:24 Re: support for omvs
2004-03-09 18:46 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-11 22:38 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-12 03:14 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-15 20:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-16 04:15 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-16 15:08 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-17 19:23 LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 19:56 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 21:32 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 21:56 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 21:59 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 22:18 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-19 06:09 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-23 20:36 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-25 15:04 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 15:59 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-26 16:12 mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3
2004-03-27 18:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
2004-03-29 15:15 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-31 15:29 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)
2004-03-31 22:06 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)

David Huddart

2004-03-27 21:53 Re: Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add.

Dennis Clarke

2004-03-16 23:12 GCC 3.3.3 build status for Solaris 2.5.1 on x86

Devang Patel

2004-03-04 19:59 [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-04 20:39 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-05 19:06 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-05 19:28 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-12 18:45 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-13 22:41 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-15 23:08 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 00:02 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 06:33 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 21:40 [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 22:00 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 22:31 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 23:08 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 23:18 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 00:51 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 19:09 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-26 18:46 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?

Diego Novillo

2004-03-01 01:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-03-01 17:02 Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bugc++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...)
2004-03-03 15:34 Re: [tree-ssa] c++/14408 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4
2004-03-04 15:48 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-03
2004-03-05 19:17 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-05 19:22 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-05 19:41 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-05 19:44 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-05 23:48 [tree-ssa] mini merge
2004-03-08 18:08 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-07
2004-03-12 15:45 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-12 16:00 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-12 17:38 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-12 18:21 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-13 00:07 [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-13 00:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-13 14:57 Re: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in3.5-tree-ssa 040120
2004-03-13 15:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-13 15:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-13 15:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-15 13:56 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline destabilizing tree-ssa?
2004-03-16 00:07 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 03:02 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 21:47 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 22:17 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 22:58 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 23:13 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 00:36 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 14:51 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 15:12 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 15:13 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 20:58 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 21:54 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 22:35 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-18 14:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 16:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-22 15:23 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-22 15:27 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-22 16:34 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-22 17:12 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-22 18:30 Re: [RFC] [tree-ssa] Fix handling of BIT_FIELD_REFs andVECTOR_TYPEs
2004-03-23 19:24 Re: output binary
2004-03-26 01:33 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 02:01 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 12:52 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 15:30 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 16:31 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24
2004-03-26 17:48 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-27 00:41 RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus
2004-03-27 02:01 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus

DJ Delorie

2004-03-16 17:44 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 19:17 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 20:36 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 21:51 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 22:01 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 22:44 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 22:57 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-17 00:55 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-26 21:03 sdbout.c tree check error
2004-03-26 22:32 Re: sdbout.c tree check error
2004-03-29 21:12 fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds
2004-03-31 01:43 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds
2004-03-31 03:10 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds

Dmitry

2004-03-12 12:26 possible regression... where to look at?
2004-03-15 18:14 Re: possible regression... where to look at?

Dominik Pajak

2004-03-20 06:48 gcc3.3.2

Dorit Naishlos

2004-03-03 16:46 rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-03 18:16 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-05 00:06 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-14 10:57 Fw: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-14 10:59 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-18 15:26 [lno] compute_immediate_uses in vectorizer causes ICE in pass_redundant_phi
2004-03-20 22:07 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-20 22:08 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-22 18:57 Re: lno new optimization options
2004-03-23 06:43 Re: lno new optimization options
2004-03-23 08:40 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers

Douglas B Rupp

2004-03-19 16:59 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name

E. Weddington

2004-03-16 13:31 Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 16:33 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 16:58 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 16:59 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 18:05 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 22:37 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 22:51 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 23:02 Re: Building collect2 for C?

Edward S. Peschko

2004-03-05 03:10 support for omvs
2004-03-05 04:05 Re: support for omvs
2004-03-09 19:47 collect2.c hardcoded paths
2004-03-10 02:26 more hardcoded paths

Eljay Love-Jensen

2004-03-24 20:57 Re: problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function

Eric Botcazou

2004-03-01 16:56 Re: Wrong code and ICEs on valid PRs
2004-03-02 12:15 Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory
2004-03-04 20:00 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 20:20 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-10 13:03 More aggressive --gc-sections
2004-03-11 09:45 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-11 12:39 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-11 14:09 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-15 19:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-17 10:55 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-17 11:02 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-18 08:19 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-18 18:11 Re: Compiling gcc 3.3.3 on solaris 2.6
2004-03-18 18:23 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-18 23:29 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-18 23:58 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 06:34 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 13:06 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 15:01 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 18:28 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 19:29 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-19 21:02 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-20 11:03 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-21 07:17 Re: Patch for PR c/12373
2004-03-21 12:36 Re: Patch for PR c/12373
2004-03-21 18:14 Re: Patch for PR c/12373
2004-03-22 07:43 Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1
2004-03-22 14:19 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-26 06:35 Re: Disqualifying instructions for branch delay slot scheduling
2004-03-30 10:15 Re: GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches
2004-03-30 21:26 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-31 08:46 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-31 11:24 STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)
2004-03-31 15:32 Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)

Eric Christopher

2004-03-01 04:00 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 04:11 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-02 19:05 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-03 07:01 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 07:38 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 07:47 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 18:37 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 18:39 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 19:14 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-05 01:50 Re: My code wont compile in GCC
2004-03-05 09:15 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2
2004-03-09 01:06 Re: attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler
2004-03-12 20:09 Re: GCC version compatible problem
2004-03-12 21:49 Re: GCC version compatible problem
2004-03-16 03:12 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 17:35 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 22:46 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 23:28 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-17 22:11 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-19 22:38 Re: [Newb] Building 3.4
2004-03-20 23:25 Re: Endless loop during bootstrap?
2004-03-27 19:54 regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-27 21:46 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-27 22:05 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-27 22:10 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-28 00:33 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-29 18:57 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing

Erik Trulsson

2004-03-21 18:08 Re: 128-bit long long?

Falk Hueffner

2004-03-09 18:38 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double
2004-03-16 19:57 Re: asm memory barrier question
2004-03-28 11:06 Re: Warning on cast to const
2004-03-29 13:54 Re: bitfield-- != 0 still broken

Fariborz Jahanian

2004-03-26 18:18 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering

Feranando Roberto Secco

2004-03-22 21:59 machine files from 2.95 to 3.2.3
2004-03-24 16:28 2.95 to 3.2.3

FGales

2004-03-13 14:47 Basic g++ Compiler Question

FOSTER,MARK S

2004-03-23 19:20 output binary

Frank Ch. Eigler

2004-03-19 11:19 Re: license of libmudflap?

Frank Pilhofer

2004-03-20 00:56 C++: Non-allowed exception diagnostic?

fredy . pena

2004-03-11 15:01 info

Gabriel Dos Reis

2004-03-01 03:55 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 04:00 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 15:02 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 18:56 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 19:48 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 19:57 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 20:37 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 20:57 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 21:40 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-02 17:33 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 00:52 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 00:57 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 01:21 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 11:08 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 11:37 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 17:34 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 19:04 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-05 21:35 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue
2004-03-08 23:07 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 02:43 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 03:09 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 03:22 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 14:00 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-10 08:05 Re: C++ language lawyer question
2004-03-10 08:21 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-10 10:30 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-10 23:42 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-12 06:58 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-13 03:30 GCC-3.3.4 release status
2004-03-14 23:49 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 03:01 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 03:05 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 03:29 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 08:57 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 10:19 Re: C++ language lawyer question
2004-03-15 12:53 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 16:59 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 17:10 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 17:47 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 17:58 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 20:41 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-17 04:35 Re: 3.3/3.4/head (was: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535)
2004-03-17 04:39 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 08:08 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 15:17 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-20 01:17 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW
2004-03-22 03:35 Re: jFP religious wars
2004-03-23 12:52 Re: how to get gcc-3.3.3.tar.gz
2004-03-23 18:58 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 23:48 Re: [Fwd: Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.]
2004-03-25 00:00 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 00:02 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 00:05 Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.
2004-03-25 05:45 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-27 10:21 GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-30 12:56 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-30 13:10 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-31 09:40 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report

Gabriel Paubert

2004-03-19 18:11 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-25 23:17 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)

Gareth Williams

2004-03-24 15:39 large file support in g++

gavinband

2004-03-01 17:08 inernal compiler error
2004-03-01 19:14 Re: inernal compiler error

Gazelle Jean-Laurent

2004-03-10 17:57 GCC3.3.3: building cross compiler powerpc-linux undefined symbol

gccadmin

2004-03-01 17:31 gcc-ss-3.3-20040301 is now available
2004-03-03 17:18 gcc-ss-3.4-20040303 is now available
2004-03-08 17:20 gcc-ss-3.3-20040308 is now available
2004-03-10 17:31 gcc-ss-3.4-20040310 is now available
2004-03-15 17:48 gcc-ss-3.3-20040315 is now available
2004-03-17 17:37 gcc-ss-3.4-20040317 is now available
2004-03-22 17:45 gcc-ss-3.3-20040322 is now available
2004-03-24 17:47 gcc-ss-3.4-20040324 is now available
2004-03-29 17:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20040329 is now available
2004-03-31 17:41 gcc-ss-3.4-20040331 is now available

Geert Bosch

2004-03-15 17:44 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 17:46 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-16 18:17 Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation
2004-03-18 15:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 16:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 16:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-25 18:59 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-27 21:37 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?

Geoff Keating

2004-03-01 19:47 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 19:48 Re: retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++
2004-03-01 20:21 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 21:19 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 21:46 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 22:54 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-02 21:00 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-02 21:01 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-05 05:48 Re: FUNCTION_BOUNDARY and FUNCTION_TYPE

George Garvey

2004-03-02 21:24 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final

George R Goffe

2004-03-31 17:12 problems with subversions.gcc.org

Gerald Pfeifer

2004-03-08 19:34 Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again)
2004-03-11 22:16 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra?
2004-03-13 15:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-14 01:56 Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again)
2004-03-14 22:15 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-16 22:57 3.3/3.4/head (was: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535)
2004-03-24 18:40 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and streeversion of enumerators
2004-03-24 23:01 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited
2004-03-27 01:28 PATCH for Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism
2004-03-27 01:35 Re: PATCH for Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism
2004-03-27 02:39 Re: [PATCH] GCC Warning Options Documentation
2004-03-27 12:23 gcc-ss-3.5-20040327 is now available
2004-03-28 02:37 Re: new GCC mirror

Gerhard Tonn

2004-03-12 13:21 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions

Giovanni Bajo

2004-03-01 00:41 Re: __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc 3.4.0
2004-03-02 19:25 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-05 04:27 Re: Declaring Arrays
2004-03-10 01:52 Re: Questions about the instruction selection for sse2 intrinsic with -O optimization
2004-03-15 15:01 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-03-16 02:09 C++ status (Was: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09))
2004-03-17 16:05 Re: explicit instantiation: function vs. class
2004-03-21 11:58 Re: Patch for PR c/12373
2004-03-23 19:06 Re: Request for bugzilla submitters/maintainers: "Reportad against" field

Glenn MacGregor

2004-03-29 20:39 function template question

GOTO Masanori

2004-03-08 01:28 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double

Graeme Peterson

2004-03-29 16:50 GPL legal question
2004-03-29 17:32 Re: GPL legal question
2004-03-29 18:49 Re: GPL legal question

Gunther Nikl

2004-03-02 10:42 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-02 12:34 Re: [PATCH] Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory
2004-03-04 07:25 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-04 10:58 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-04 15:32 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-08 16:31 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-09 08:40 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-15 11:26 statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 13:50 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 14:49 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 15:35 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 16:41 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-16 14:18 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-16 14:54 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-17 10:28 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-17 12:16 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]
2004-03-17 13:05 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-18 09:43 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]
2004-03-18 14:51 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?

H. J. Lu

2004-03-01 00:46 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-03-01 16:53 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-03-01 19:47 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-03-03 21:55 Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-03 23:13 The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.1 is released
2004-03-04 16:04 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 17:21 Re: binutils 2.15.90.0.1 doesn't install as.1 man page
2004-03-04 21:43 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 21:49 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-05 17:08 Re: binutils 2.15.90.0.1 break ia64 kernel crosscompiling
2004-03-06 02:43 The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 is released
2004-03-09 19:15 "make check" faulures in glibc with gcc 3.4
2004-03-17 18:19 Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding
2004-03-21 17:34 Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc
2004-03-22 18:33 Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-22 21:52 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-22 23:48 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-24 22:54 How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 15:32 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-26 22:08 Enable 128bit soft-fp for ia32 and ia64?
2004-03-26 22:12 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-26 22:26 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-29 18:14 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?

haibo

2004-03-09 03:17 Question about GCC -O optimization with sse2 programming.
2004-03-09 03:36 Questions about the instruction selection for sse2 intrinsic with -O optimization

Hans-Peter Nilsson

2004-03-09 10:42 Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59
2004-03-14 22:12 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-17 15:29 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-18 14:03 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-21 16:03 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-21 16:11 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-22 02:08 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)

hartmut . schirmer

2004-03-17 12:28 Warning on dangerous use of assert() ?

Hartmut Penner

2004-03-15 15:19 Re:[tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage ?

Henning Baldersheim

2004-03-08 06:42 thread enabled ecos support
2004-03-11 19:26 multilib and with/without exceptionsand rtti
2004-03-11 20:17 Re: thread enabled ecos support

Henning dot Baldersheim at devoll dot no

2004-03-11 22:52 Re: functexcept.cc draws in everything

Henrik Sorensen

2004-03-21 19:10 PL/1 Frontend for GCC v0.0.4
2004-03-30 20:46 PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.5

Hunter Horsman

2004-03-01 02:54 gcc 3.3.3 built on PowerPC Mac OS X 10.3.2 7D24/Darwin 7.2.0

Ian Lance Taylor

2004-03-01 17:16 Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...)
2004-03-02 02:48 Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
2004-03-02 19:59 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-02 20:17 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-03 04:04 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-07 03:05 Re: gcc and arm interworking
2004-03-08 20:51 Re: Shebang
2004-03-08 21:13 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-09 21:32 Re: handling of FIXED_REGISTERS
2004-03-10 00:04 PATCH RFA: Remove SUNOS4_SHARED_LIBRARIES (Was collect2.c hardcoded paths)
2004-03-10 00:15 Re: Expr constructor question
2004-03-10 14:35 Re: Expr constructor question
2004-03-10 15:13 Re: Question: automatic variable memory allocation
2004-03-12 02:49 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-12 17:02 Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0
2004-03-14 18:23 Re: signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-15 15:11 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 16:46 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 17:28 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 22:17 Re: signed/unsigned right shift
2004-03-16 13:00 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-16 14:47 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-16 14:59 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 16:38 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 17:11 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-17 02:18 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-17 02:51 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-17 02:55 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 03:00 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 17:05 Re: Newb question about code style
2004-03-19 22:34 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-19 22:56 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-19 23:00 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-20 01:16 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization
2004-03-20 14:51 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-20 21:56 Re: Patch for PR c/12373
2004-03-21 13:02 Re: Requested documentation update [contribution]
2004-03-25 01:23 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-25 06:14 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-26 21:09 Re: sdbout.c tree check error
2004-03-27 01:26 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus
2004-03-27 07:07 PR 14400--PCH problem with large files
2004-03-30 07:06 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0

Ignasi Villagrasa

2004-03-21 19:24 malloc mutex and exceptions

ildar

2004-03-16 14:22 Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help
2004-03-18 09:37 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help
2004-03-18 14:24 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help

J. Buchanan

2004-03-15 04:44 -fdump-translation-unit[-option]

Jakub Jelinek

2004-03-02 10:56 Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory
2004-03-02 11:12 [PATCH] Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory
2004-03-02 19:55 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-02 20:09 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-11 12:48 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-13 10:17 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double
2004-03-15 08:20 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 16:40 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-16 13:31 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-18 23:36 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 08:14 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 08:26 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)
2004-03-25 14:29 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 23:25 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)

James Morrison

2004-03-01 06:14 Re: Munging gcc-testresults@ messages
2004-03-15 05:15 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-20 20:41 sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1
2004-03-20 20:51 Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1
2004-03-20 22:35 Endless loop during bootstrap?
2004-03-20 23:58 Re: Endless loop during bootstrap?
2004-03-28 07:07 Re: Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc.

James Southard_Jr

2004-03-21 05:08 Requested documentation update [contribution]

Jamie Lokier

2004-03-06 18:01 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly
2004-03-06 18:58 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly
2004-03-06 20:26 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly
2004-03-08 22:32 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly
2004-03-15 20:25 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 20:52 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-19 13:53 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-19 14:31 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?

Jan Hoogerbrugge

2004-03-10 09:19 Restrict pointers
2004-03-12 15:28 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-18 15:32 Exception handling HowTO??

Jan Hubicka

2004-03-01 20:20 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 20:33 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-02 17:11 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-02 17:22 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-13 15:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-17 23:22 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-18 18:37 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)
2004-03-20 15:01 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)
2004-03-22 11:37 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-23 17:03 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-23 17:10 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-23 17:31 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-25 20:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Debugging information issue.

Jan Teluch

2004-03-25 19:43 new GCC mirror

japetersen

2004-03-01 13:25 Re: Your software

Jared Buttles

2004-03-25 18:19 Register objects question
2004-03-25 22:47 Best way to create rtl code
2004-03-31 12:14 Re: Best way to create rtl code

Jason

2004-03-30 16:08 unobsoleting m88k

Jeff Sturm

2004-03-01 14:51 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 19:39 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final

jhjk jhj

2004-03-16 14:05 asm memory barrier question

Jim Wilson

2004-03-02 00:25 Re: [patch] Re: recount_dominator
2004-03-02 01:11 Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
2004-03-02 01:29 Re: RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c
2004-03-02 01:47 Re: building gcc-3.4 with mingw/msys
2004-03-02 06:06 Re: Unnamed Structure declaration
2004-03-02 06:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-03-02 23:37 Re: GCC 3.2 runs with glibc-2.2, crashes with glibc-2.3?
2004-03-02 23:50 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue
2004-03-03 00:08 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final (sorry, wrong subject)
2004-03-03 08:01 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 08:03 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 08:15 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 18:27 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue
2004-03-03 18:33 Re: installing gcc on HP UX 11
2004-03-04 20:21 Re: pthread issue...
2004-03-04 20:45 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "+m" constraints in inline asm
2004-03-04 20:53 Re: Porting GCC Toolchain
2004-03-04 21:02 Re: constant pool issues
2004-03-04 21:10 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases
2004-03-05 19:58 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue
2004-03-05 20:36 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?
2004-03-10 01:02 Re: local vars transmission (fwd)
2004-03-10 01:42 Re: [reload] never-used stack slots?
2004-03-10 01:49 Re: thread enabled ecos support
2004-03-10 01:52 Re: Proposal: fine-grained control over -Werror
2004-03-10 01:55 Re: GCC3.3.3 Successful build in ia64-hpux11.23(hp rx5670)
2004-03-10 01:58 Re: Question about GCC -O optimization with sse2 programming.
2004-03-10 02:05 Re: Questions about the instruction selection for sse2 intrinsicwith -O optimization
2004-03-10 02:18 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code
2004-03-11 02:06 Re: genrecog of i386.md under linux, 5 warnings...
2004-03-11 02:16 Re: more hardcoded paths
2004-03-11 19:23 Re: GCC3.3.3: building cross compiler powerpc-linux undefined symbol
2004-03-11 19:26 Re: new/delete mismatch
2004-03-11 19:47 Re: Restrict pointers
2004-03-16 08:48 Re: multilib and with/without exceptionsand rtti
2004-03-16 08:57 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-16 09:00 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch
2004-03-16 09:02 Re: Expr Constructor Question Part 2
2004-03-16 09:19 Re: -fdump-translation-unit[-option]
2004-03-16 09:36 Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation
2004-03-16 20:14 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch
2004-03-16 21:18 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch
2004-03-17 20:10 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]
2004-03-17 22:59 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]
2004-03-18 07:49 Re: powerpc-*-elf versus powerpc-*-eabi
2004-03-18 07:59 Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding
2004-03-18 08:08 Re: Oh my god, it's full of NULLs
2004-03-18 08:25 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-18 19:56 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-18 20:07 Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding
2004-03-19 08:31 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-25 20:47 Re: m68k-linux regressions
2004-03-29 23:01 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cacheoperation is required (?)
2004-03-29 23:58 Re: Exception handling HowTO??
2004-03-30 00:06 Re: HP-UX Core Dump in stack unwinding
2004-03-30 00:11 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization
2004-03-30 00:20 Re: C++: Non-allowed exception diagnostic?
2004-03-30 00:20 Re: Is it possible to use libstdc++.so.5 with 3.4?
2004-03-30 00:21 Re: Can -frepo be used with PCH?
2004-03-30 00:24 Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers
2004-03-30 00:29 Re: About RTL
2004-03-30 00:38 Re: 128-bit long long?
2004-03-30 00:52 Re: Help writing RTL expression ?
2004-03-30 00:57 Re: machine files from 2.95 to 3.2.3
2004-03-30 01:16 Re: Register objects question
2004-03-30 01:20 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests
2004-03-30 01:34 Re: String optimisations gone?
2004-03-30 01:44 Re: No luck building GCC on sparc-linux using --with-gc=zone
2004-03-30 01:46 Re: Any Question
2004-03-30 01:56 Re: GCC: structure typedef compilation error
2004-03-30 02:10 Re: Operator overloading in (MIPS) assembly-language
2004-03-30 02:17 Re: Best way to create rtl code
2004-03-30 20:31 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses
2004-03-31 01:15 Re: Code generation
2004-03-31 01:32 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds
2004-03-31 01:45 Re: Floating Point Exception Handling
2004-03-31 01:48 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump
2004-03-31 02:50 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds
2004-03-31 05:58 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds
2004-03-31 06:38 Re: No Subject
2004-03-31 07:27 Re: RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed
2004-03-31 07:53 Re: RFC: failure of gcc.dg/funcorder.c on hppa64
2004-03-31 08:03 Re: RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed
2004-03-31 08:09 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds

Jiri Pittner

2004-03-30 22:09 modification of g77 for default 64-bit integers on x86-64

Joe Buck

2004-03-01 18:19 Re: inernal compiler error
2004-03-01 18:22 Re: retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++
2004-03-01 18:34 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 18:45 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 18:53 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 18:57 Re: GCC bootstrap.
2004-03-01 19:00 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?
2004-03-01 19:11 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 20:09 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 20:18 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 20:58 Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project
2004-03-01 21:22 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-02 23:10 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 01:51 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 18:12 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 19:23 Re: bug report with downloaded copiler
2004-03-04 18:27 Re: Logging data structure field accesses
2004-03-04 19:17 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 20:08 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-08 23:32 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 00:54 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 22:47 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables
2004-03-09 22:50 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables
2004-03-11 23:58 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-12 16:46 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-12 17:12 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-12 17:18 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-15 17:42 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 17:45 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 17:52 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 18:13 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-16 19:20 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 19:22 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 23:20 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables
2004-03-23 17:51 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-23 18:36 Request for bugzilla submitters/maintainers: "Reportad against" field
2004-03-23 18:55 Re: Request for bugzilla submitters/maintainers: "Reportad against" field
2004-03-23 19:44 Re: Exception and pthread on HPUX
2004-03-24 18:02 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 18:51 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:04 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:12 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:23 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:29 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 01:07 -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-25 17:09 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-25 19:24 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-25 19:43 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-26 17:42 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-26 18:33 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-26 18:51 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-26 23:53 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-27 00:23 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-27 00:58 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-29 16:47 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern.
2004-03-29 17:16 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-29 18:44 Re: GPL legal question
2004-03-30 18:46 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-30 18:56 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report
2004-03-31 02:03 Re: Floating Point Exception Handling
2004-03-31 17:15 Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)

Joel Sherrill

2004-03-10 13:16 sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c
2004-03-16 15:45 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch
2004-03-16 21:01 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch
2004-03-17 15:36 gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-18 14:15 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-18 23:43 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 12:18 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 12:28 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 16:25 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-20 19:51 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-21 15:49 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name

Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp dot com>

2004-03-10 14:14 Re: sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c
2004-03-10 17:29 Re: sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c
2004-03-12 18:31 weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch

Joern Rennecke

2004-03-16 12:34 RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations?
2004-03-16 17:12 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help
2004-03-17 12:23 Re: RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations?
2004-03-18 13:11 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help
2004-03-18 13:21 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help
2004-03-19 15:58 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-19 17:02 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-19 17:24 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-23 20:20 Re: simplejump_p does not recognise jumps in parallel rtx
2004-03-30 18:33 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-30 19:23 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses

John David Anglin

2004-03-21 05:25 RFC: failure of gcc.dg/funcorder.c on hppa64

John L. Kulp

2004-03-26 18:37 Floating Point Exception Handling

John Lu

2004-03-26 19:54 Register Allocation

John S. Dyson

2004-03-01 05:00 Re: gcc and compiling speed

Jonathan Wilson

2004-03-05 01:42 My code wont compile in GCC

Joost VandeVondele

2004-03-25 07:24 (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 13:06 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 14:21 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 18:47 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)

Josef Zlomek

2004-03-19 10:18 Re: [For "zlomek": Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]
2004-03-25 14:45 Re: Does var tracking allow debuggable -frename-registers?

Joseph S. Myers

2004-03-09 00:17 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 00:49 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 09:39 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 10:41 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 11:54 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 17:37 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-10 10:15 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-12 18:56 Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0
2004-03-12 20:18 Re: GCC version compatible problem
2004-03-15 14:05 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 14:28 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 20:39 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-16 13:05 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-16 23:10 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-17 22:02 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-18 16:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 21:45 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness
2004-03-21 19:21 Re: 128-bit long long?
2004-03-24 19:14 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:50 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 16:18 Re: Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ?
2004-03-25 16:22 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-26 16:38 Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for singlemultiply add.
2004-03-26 19:03 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-29 19:16 Re: glibc and inline functions

Julian Brown

2004-03-13 20:10 Bad mode-change inside subreg: DImode to SImode
2004-03-15 16:30 Re: Bad mode-change inside subreg: DImode to SImode

Julian R. Parramore

2004-03-01 10:03 Successful build of gcc-3.3.2 on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0e
2004-03-01 10:04 Successful build of gcc-3.3.3 on mips-sgi-irix6.5

Junior Smith

2004-03-01 22:34 09.KK. john holmes ..... YOU

Kai Henningsen

2004-03-05 22:26 Re: Building GENERIC trees
2004-03-16 23:10 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-16 23:10 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-16 23:10 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-16 23:55 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-19 21:30 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?

Kate Minola

2004-03-02 20:49 sucessful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.3 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2004-03-02 20:51 sucessful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.3 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0

Kaveh R. Ghazi

2004-03-01 15:44 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely?
2004-03-06 18:54 Question on valid transformations for cbrt
2004-03-13 23:05 Two places in GCC doing (float)func(x) -> funcf(x) ??
2004-03-15 02:41 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-25 13:21 Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ?
2004-03-26 00:01 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken
2004-03-26 03:17 Re: Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ?
2004-03-29 13:57 GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches
2004-03-31 12:42 Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)

Kazu Hirata

2004-03-12 19:41 Re: GCC version compatible problem
2004-03-15 05:50 tree-ssa performance from rebuild_jump_labels's view
2004-03-25 05:34 It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself?

Kedar Namjoshi

2004-03-02 23:33 g++ 3.5.0 and tree-ssa parse problem: incomplete types

Kelley Cook

2004-03-09 03:21 Move mainline to autoconf 2.59
2004-03-12 16:51 [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0
2004-03-12 20:05 Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0
2004-03-16 15:03 Re: Moving from mcpu to march/mtune everywhere?
2004-03-19 13:47 Re: optmizing gcc 3.3.1 for AMD athlon xp
2004-03-24 22:21 Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.
2004-03-27 13:32 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2

Kevin Atkinson

2004-03-01 06:15 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 08:04 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 20:58 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-16 00:37 libstdc++ (was Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!)

Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

2004-03-07 18:30 Away from email

Lars Segerlund

2004-03-08 11:38 Re: Building GENERIC trees

Laurent GUERBY

2004-03-15 19:44 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-22 22:46 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-23 11:28 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-23 19:37 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-23 19:48 darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem
2004-03-23 20:50 Re: [Newb] Stepping into gnat
2004-03-23 21:00 Re: darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem
2004-03-25 11:27 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 11:29 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 11:55 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 18:54 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 19:40 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests
2004-03-25 21:02 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-25 21:34 mainline broken on x86-linux?
2004-03-26 18:49 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-26 22:21 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-26 22:43 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?
2004-03-26 23:20 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-27 00:11 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-28 11:42 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?

law

2004-03-01 05:12 Re: Obsolete mn10200?
2004-03-02 07:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
2004-03-02 19:22 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-04 18:02 Re: Logging data structure field accesses
2004-03-05 18:11 Re: Building GENERIC trees
2004-03-10 04:17 [tree-ssa] abort in stabilize_call
2004-03-15 18:01 C++ Front-end or inliner bug with tree-ssa
2004-03-16 15:24 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables
2004-03-16 23:42 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 00:28 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 03:30 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 03:32 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 14:59 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 18:42 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 18:44 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 18:46 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-17 19:38 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 20:06 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-17 22:11 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-18 10:33 Re: license of libmudflap?
2004-03-22 16:33 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-25 18:03 Question for ISO C standards gurus
2004-03-26 15:28 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 15:30 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 16:06 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-26 16:21 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-26 16:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24
2004-03-26 18:37 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-27 14:25 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus
2004-03-27 19:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed

Leah

2004-03-08 20:24 Shebang

Linus Torvalds

2004-03-10 15:36 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'

llewelly

2004-03-13 20:59 Re: Basic g++ Compiler Question
2004-03-20 02:56 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW
2004-03-22 05:16 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc

Long Li

2004-03-05 07:54 gcc support for mips32 release 2

Lu Peng

2004-03-12 19:26 GCC version compatible problem
2004-03-12 19:47 Re: GCC version compatible problem

Marc Buglonnier - - - -- -- - -

2004-03-05 14:58 TOP 50 de la libert� - - - -- -- - -

Mark Mitchell

2004-03-01 02:29 Vector problems with GCC 3.4
2004-03-01 02:32 Problems with cp_expr_size and friends in GCC 3.4
2004-03-01 04:14 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4
2004-03-01 04:39 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4
2004-03-01 05:04 Wrong code and ICEs on valid PRs
2004-03-01 05:18 GCC Status Report (2004-02-29)
2004-03-01 19:10 Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 20:11 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 20:25 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 20:27 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 21:45 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 22:03 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 23:26 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-02 00:03 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-02 00:09 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-02 17:04 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-02 17:18 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-03 03:05 Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 07:25 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 08:08 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 08:09 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 08:20 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 17:49 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 19:09 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 19:30 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-08 21:04 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-08 21:27 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases
2004-03-08 21:34 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-08 22:29 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-08 22:32 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-08 22:49 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-08 23:43 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 00:34 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 01:37 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 09:59 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 11:14 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 17:26 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 17:46 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 18:03 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459:warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function
2004-03-09 18:09 GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-16 04:34 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-16 16:53 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-16 22:32 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-17 03:39 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators
2004-03-17 05:53 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-03-17 15:54 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-18 18:46 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 02:04 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 17:38 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 18:48 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-21 20:27 GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-23 08:51 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-23 08:52 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)
2004-03-23 19:38 Re: Exception and pthread on HPUX
2004-03-23 21:28 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)

Mark Wielaard

2004-03-31 07:43 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump
2004-03-31 07:55 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump

market

2004-03-10 10:13 full space, this user is limit quota

Matt Austern

2004-03-02 20:58 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-08 19:27 New development branch: stree-branch
2004-03-09 22:30 Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables
2004-03-16 23:44 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators
2004-03-17 06:37 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators
2004-03-30 19:19 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators

Matthew Tippett

2004-03-04 04:53 Intrinsic support without -sse2
2004-03-06 06:06 Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly
2004-03-06 15:31 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly

Matthias Benkmann

2004-03-09 21:17 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa

Matthias Klose

2004-03-12 06:42 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-21 23:07 Re: m68k-linux regressions

Max Asbock

2004-03-08 19:18 problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code
2004-03-11 18:45 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code

mbroadst

2004-03-03 15:39 Porting GCC Toolchain

Meg Abyte

2004-03-02 06:36 Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?

Michael Eager

2004-03-15 23:57 locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 01:08 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 16:10 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 17:47 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 22:45 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-17 00:19 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-17 00:52 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-17 22:42 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-17 22:45 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-18 01:02 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-18 16:18 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-19 23:02 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity

Michael GZ

2004-03-17 18:11 Exception and pthread on HPUX
2004-03-17 18:21 Exception and pthread on HPUX
2004-03-19 15:48 HP-UX Core Dump in stack unwinding

Michael Koch

2004-03-19 16:20 Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com
2004-03-19 17:07 Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com

Michael Matz

2004-03-01 08:03 Re: __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc3.4.0
2004-03-01 14:39 retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++
2004-03-16 12:30 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-16 12:39 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-29 05:59 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-29 13:46 bitfield-- != 0 still broken
2004-03-29 14:03 Re: bitfield-- != 0 still broken

Michael Stather

2004-03-01 20:16 Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project

Mihai Burcea

2004-03-03 21:58 constant pool issues
2004-03-06 02:59 local vars transmission
2004-03-06 03:00 local vars transmission (fwd)

Mike Capp

2004-03-04 20:03 Re: Logging data structure field accesses (Mozilla-friendly)

Mike Stump

2004-03-16 01:46 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-16 02:15 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables
2004-03-16 03:36 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-16 20:00 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables
2004-03-16 20:31 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 22:15 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-16 22:40 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-17 01:30 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-17 18:47 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-23 20:49 Re: darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem
2004-03-23 22:08 Re: darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem
2004-03-25 20:40 new apple-ppc branch
2004-03-26 21:48 Re: new apple-ppc branch
2004-03-30 00:53 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization
2004-03-30 06:20 Re: Should fold preserve types?
2004-03-31 08:20 Re: new apple-ppc branch

Mile Davidovic

2004-03-05 08:29 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2

Mostafa Hagog

2004-03-31 12:23 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)
2004-03-31 12:53 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)
2004-03-31 14:06 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)
2004-03-31 14:42 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)

n f

2004-03-24 20:14 problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function

Nathan Holladay

2004-03-03 18:37 bug report with downloaded copiler

Nathan Sidwell

2004-03-01 10:20 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-01 15:04 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-02 10:01 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-15 09:54 Re: C++ language lawyer question
2004-03-15 11:46 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 14:03 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 15:20 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 15:54 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-15 17:50 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-16 09:12 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-16 17:54 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-17 12:22 Re: Newb question about code style
2004-03-19 14:45 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-29 07:57 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern.

Nathanael Nerode

2004-03-15 18:12 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in (poorly designed) trig test!
2004-03-16 01:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-16 05:14 Moving from mcpu to march/mtune everywhere?
2004-03-17 01:49 Proposed standard scheme for maintainers' debugging code
2004-03-24 05:20 Making -ffast-math more fine-grained?
2004-03-31 04:43 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds

Neil Booth

2004-03-10 06:39 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-18 20:38 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness
2004-03-18 20:52 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness

Nick Clifton

2004-03-09 12:11 Re: request for a copyright assignment
2004-03-30 09:39 Re: ld segfault when building objc source with pthread

Nicolas Poubetier

2004-03-24 13:27 Re : - -- - ------ -

Nuwan Kodagoda

2004-03-05 03:51 Declaring Arrays

Olatunji Ruwase

2004-03-09 20:04 handling of FIXED_REGISTERS

Olivier . Polit

2004-03-02 15:46 installing gcc on HP UX 11

Omer Shenker

2004-03-08 14:34 Proposal: fine-grained control over -Werror

Otto Bruggeman

2004-03-17 15:43 IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding
2004-03-18 19:18 Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding

Paolo Bonzini

2004-03-13 14:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-20 08:02 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass
2004-03-21 16:56 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass
2004-03-22 18:27 Re: [RFC] [tree-ssa] Fix handling of BIT_FIELD_REFs andVECTOR_TYPEs
2004-03-25 10:22 Does var tracking allow debuggable -frename-registers?

Paolo Carlini

2004-03-15 00:11 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 00:32 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 11:25 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 11:31 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 13:15 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-03-15 13:42 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 13:55 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 14:13 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 14:43 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-03-15 15:09 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-03-15 16:56 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 17:15 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 10:55 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators
2004-03-18 12:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 13:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 15:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-21 15:46 Re: 128-bit long long?
2004-03-21 19:37 Re: 128-bit long long?
2004-03-23 21:41 Re: 128-bit long long?
2004-03-24 18:29 Re: CVSROOT/modules bug
2004-03-31 12:43 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)
2004-03-31 13:49 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)
2004-03-31 14:21 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)
2004-03-31 14:40 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)

Paul Brook

2004-03-05 18:23 Re: Building GENERIC trees
2004-03-12 17:24 Re: Building GENERIC trees and passing the symbol table
2004-03-15 11:43 IWMMXT vector type alignment
2004-03-17 12:20 Re: Newb question about code style
2004-03-24 18:53 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:10 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!

Paul Jarc

2004-03-08 20:49 Re: Shebang
2004-03-08 22:33 Re: Shebang
2004-03-08 22:46 Re: Shebang
2004-03-09 02:53 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-09 03:15 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
2004-03-25 18:12 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus

Paul Koning

2004-03-10 18:35 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-16 16:59 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-16 17:25 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 19:59 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-20 21:06 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-24 13:50 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:10 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 14:24 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-30 17:48 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)
2004-03-31 16:26 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)

Paul Smith

2004-03-17 12:50 Re: [Savannah-hackers] Savannah down

Per Abrahamsen

2004-03-01 13:51 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-16 08:45 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 13:13 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 15:55 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 16:38 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 16:51 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!

Per Bothner

2004-03-04 00:50 Re: [tree-ssa] 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4
2004-03-19 15:56 email/mail server woes for bothner.com

perugupa

2004-03-04 03:03 i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases
2004-03-05 10:42 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases

Petar Penchev

2004-03-22 08:06 Help writing RTL expression ?

Peter Barada

2004-03-05 15:46 Re: Taking a stab at register-relative data addressing on m68k...

Peter Galbavy

2004-03-01 19:40 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 20:05 Re: gcc and compiling speed

Peter Korosec

2004-03-23 12:27 how to get gcc-3.3.3.tar.gz

Petko Manolov

2004-03-09 08:57 request for a copyright assignment

Phil Blundell

2004-03-12 16:50 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-12 17:17 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions

Phil Edwards

2004-03-08 07:51 LD vs multilibs
2004-03-15 17:53 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-16 00:13 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 21:37 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 21:56 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-17 00:44 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-17 00:55 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-19 05:33 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-19 06:42 latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3
2004-03-19 11:30 Re: latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3
2004-03-19 23:12 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-20 04:50 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc

Philip Blundell

2004-03-12 10:44 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-12 12:44 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions

poschmid

2004-03-15 09:37 Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2004-03-30 08:18 [fortran] Results of g77 3.4.0 testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Primrose.Mbanefo

2004-03-30 14:02 Code generation

R. D. Flowers

2004-03-21 20:52 Re: gcc Digest 21 Mar 2004 05:08:56 -0000 Issue 3435
2004-03-21 21:03 jFP religious wars
2004-03-21 21:20 Re: jFP religious wars
2004-03-22 04:00 Re: jFP religious wars

r6144

2004-03-20 04:06 Can -frepo be used with PCH?
2004-03-20 04:29 Is it possible to use libstdc++.so.5 with 3.4?

Rakesh Avichal Ughreja

2004-03-16 10:30 gcc for Texas Instruments DSP 64xx

Ralf Corsepius

2004-03-10 13:25 Re: sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c
2004-03-10 15:11 Re: sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c
2004-03-19 08:45 Re: latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3

Ranjit Mathew

2004-03-04 05:30 Re: Porting GCC Toolchain
2004-03-08 10:24 3.5 Snapshots (Again)
2004-03-09 06:51 Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again)
2004-03-15 07:42 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 10:46 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators
2004-03-31 06:40 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump

Ray Whitmer

2004-03-05 14:07 Taking a stab at register-relative data addressing on m68k...

Remco Rijnders

2004-03-19 16:48 Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com

Richard B. Kreckel

2004-03-23 21:35 Re: 128-bit long long?

Richard Earnshaw

2004-03-08 10:39 Re: gcc and arm interworking
2004-03-12 12:08 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-12 17:23 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
2004-03-15 11:46 Re: IWMMXT vector type alignment
2004-03-31 09:44 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses

Richard Guenther

2004-03-02 14:03 3.4 speed improvements
2004-03-03 14:46 [tree-ssa] 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4
2004-03-03 15:28 Re: [tree-ssa] c++/14408 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4
2004-03-13 12:34 Re: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in3.5-tree-ssa 040120
2004-03-13 15:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-13 15:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-13 15:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-13 15:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status
2004-03-15 13:28 [tree-ssa] mainline destabilizing tree-ssa?
2004-03-17 21:40 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-18 14:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-24 18:40 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 19:39 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-26 18:10 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-29 21:09 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report

Richard Henderson

2004-03-02 18:19 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-02 18:45 [tree-ssa] merge completed
2004-03-02 21:32 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-03 00:09 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 00:33 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 07:48 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-04 00:35 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-04 20:48 Re: Intrinsic support without -sse2
2004-03-04 21:03 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-04 23:06 Re: Help with writing RTL for RISC CPU
2004-03-05 19:45 Re: init_integral_libfuncs question
2004-03-06 19:27 Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem
2004-03-06 19:52 Re: Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for over a week.
2004-03-07 05:58 [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double
2004-03-10 05:49 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-10 18:22 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-10 18:37 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-10 19:41 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code
2004-03-10 22:22 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'
2004-03-11 21:00 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code
2004-03-11 21:11 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-11 22:17 Re: PATCH RFA: Remove SUNOS4_SHARED_LIBRARIES (Was collect2.c hardcoded paths)
2004-03-11 23:31 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers
2004-03-12 23:30 Re: possible regression... where to look at?
2004-03-14 01:58 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double
2004-03-15 22:38 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-15 22:51 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-15 23:08 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-15 23:20 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 00:45 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 03:33 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 04:57 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 06:54 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 18:32 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 18:34 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 23:06 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 23:07 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-16 23:22 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-16 23:33 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-17 01:19 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-17 21:05 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-18 00:13 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-18 16:23 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-18 16:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 21:28 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness
2004-03-19 19:49 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-19 20:04 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass
2004-03-19 20:23 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass
2004-03-20 18:09 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass
2004-03-21 19:29 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass
2004-03-22 18:21 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?
2004-03-24 00:46 Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed
2004-03-25 18:58 Re: It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself?
2004-03-26 22:27 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-30 20:03 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)

Richard Kenner

2004-03-02 01:40 Re: RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c
2004-03-04 20:23 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-05 03:32 FUNCTION_BOUNDARY and FUNCTION_TYPE
2004-03-11 12:15 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-11 12:49 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-11 13:48 TYPE_VFIELD documentation
2004-03-16 12:32 Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation
2004-03-16 18:33 Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation
2004-03-19 01:23 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 12:31 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 12:33 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 13:11 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name
2004-03-19 18:41 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-19 20:08 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass
2004-03-19 21:02 Re: Mainline regression - ICE c99-complit-2.c
2004-03-22 13:57 Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-22 15:24 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-22 16:32 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-22 17:04 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge
2004-03-26 22:22 Re: sdbout.c tree check error
2004-03-27 01:51 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-27 21:41 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-27 21:56 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-27 23:52 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing
2004-03-31 14:36 Your change to gengtype-yacc.y

Richard Sandiford

2004-03-03 14:23 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-03 19:06 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?
2004-03-09 08:15 Re: attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler
2004-03-13 21:25 Re: possible regression... where to look at?
2004-03-18 11:03 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity
2004-03-18 16:34 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity

Richard Zidlicky

2004-03-01 20:15 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-01 22:05 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-02 09:14 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-02 22:26 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-03 13:27 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-04 18:45 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-05 23:25 m68k, extendqidi2 problem
2004-03-17 10:56 [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]
2004-03-17 22:27 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]
2004-03-21 20:30 Re: m68k-linux regressions

Rob . McConnell

2004-03-01 14:24 Unnamed Structure declaration

Robert Bowdidge

2004-03-04 23:52 Re: Logging data structure field accesses

Robert Dewar

2004-03-01 23:05 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-03 00:33 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final
2004-03-04 10:47 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-10 16:06 Re: Question on valid transformations for cbrt
2004-03-15 16:06 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 22:42 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 05:33 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 12:27 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-17 00:07 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 00:09 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 07:10 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-18 09:57 Re: Newb question about code style
2004-03-20 23:08 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)
2004-03-21 01:47 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-21 08:49 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-22 02:38 Re: jFP religious wars
2004-03-22 02:39 Re: jFP religious wars
2004-03-22 04:30 Re: jFP religious wars
2004-03-22 07:56 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-22 13:25 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-24 03:32 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 08:17 Re: stupid C preprocessor question
2004-03-24 16:35 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 18:25 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 05:31 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 05:34 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 05:36 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 05:41 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 05:56 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 06:03 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-25 06:05 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-25 07:29 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-25 12:37 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 13:45 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-26 16:40 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-26 18:22 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-27 00:36 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-27 00:40 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-27 00:42 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering
2004-03-27 00:48 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-27 00:50 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-27 00:55 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-29 17:02 Re: GPL legal question
2004-03-31 10:52 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses

Rogelio Serrano

2004-03-28 07:17 ld segfault when building objc source with pthread

Roger Sayle

2004-03-07 15:11 Re: Question on valid transformations for cbrt
2004-03-14 00:56 Re: Two places in GCC doing (float)func(x) -> funcf(x) ??
2004-03-14 01:37 Re: possible regression... where to look at?
2004-03-15 01:55 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-18 17:30 x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)
2004-03-18 19:15 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)
2004-03-24 14:42 Re: Making -ffast-math more fine-grained?
2004-03-24 22:19 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 14:28 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-27 01:16 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)

Rolf Ebert

2004-03-04 09:10 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?

Roman Zippel

2004-03-02 19:33 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-03 10:13 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux
2004-03-04 13:45 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux

Roy Franz

2004-03-08 18:09 attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler

Russ Allbery

2004-03-01 20:24 Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project

SAR

2004-03-07 03:54 Stop Spreading Hatred

sashan

2004-03-17 11:58 Newb question about code style
2004-03-17 12:13 Re: Newb question about code style
2004-03-17 12:21 Re: Newb question about code style
2004-03-19 22:09 [Newb] Building 3.4
2004-03-20 01:09 [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization
2004-03-20 04:11 [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-23 01:08 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-29 23:22 Re: function template question
2004-03-31 13:05 Re: [RTL] -- How to insert code into functions?

Scott A Crosby

2004-03-19 03:11 Citeseer's replacement?

Scott Robert Ladd

2004-03-14 23:40 GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 01:31 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 01:47 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 01:47 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 02:30 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 02:36 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 02:38 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 02:41 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 04:06 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 12:40 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 13:37 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 19:50 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-16 12:14 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 00:31 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 19:56 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-18 22:40 Re: gcc vectorizer/auto-parallelizer
2004-03-21 15:28 128-bit long long?
2004-03-21 19:22 Re: 128-bit long long?
2004-03-22 21:15 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?
2004-03-25 00:22 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 14:23 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 15:07 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 15:18 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 16:12 GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-25 16:15 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 16:36 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-25 17:20 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 18:38 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-25 19:14 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)
2004-03-25 19:35 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-25 19:47 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-29 18:46 glibc and inline functions

Sebastian Pop

2004-03-15 10:00 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 17:57 Re: Proposed standard scheme for maintainers' debugging code
2004-03-22 17:31 Re: lno new optimization options
2004-03-23 20:38 Re: [Newb] Stepping into gnat
2004-03-30 16:07 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC

Segher Boessenkool

2004-03-05 10:15 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases
2004-03-10 15:32 Re: Question on valid transformations for cbrt
2004-03-15 14:29 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 14:47 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-19 14:18 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-19 14:22 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-19 14:52 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-22 07:48 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?
2004-03-22 08:03 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?

Serge Belyshev

2004-03-22 17:11 lno new optimization options
2004-03-22 18:45 Re: lno new optimization options
2004-03-24 18:04 CVSROOT/modules bug

Shinpei Kato

2004-03-20 11:11 [MIPS] reduce floating point registers
2004-03-20 11:17 Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers

Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.

2004-03-03 00:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan

Stelios Xanthakis

2004-03-15 12:05 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!

Stephan T. Lavavej

2004-03-15 03:19 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-15 16:25 RE: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 00:30 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-17 00:44 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-20 00:51 Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW
2004-03-20 01:41 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW
2004-03-20 03:39 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW
2004-03-20 05:00 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW
2004-03-21 06:41 RE: Requested documentation update [contribution]

Stephane Carrez

2004-03-24 22:49 Re: problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function

Steve Ellcey

2004-03-02 16:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan (IA64 bootstrap)
2004-03-03 22:38 IA64 GCC bootstrap problem
2004-03-04 00:00 Re: IA64 GCC bootstrap problem
2004-03-05 17:15 init_integral_libfuncs question

Steve Newcomb

2004-03-26 05:32 Extreme Markup Languages Conference 2004

Steven Augart

2004-03-26 04:29 gij 3.3.3 core dump

Steven Bosscher

2004-03-01 08:09 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-18 12:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 12:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 16:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-20 18:46 RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed
2004-03-25 22:35 Mainline bootstrap broken

Steven G. Kargl

2004-03-24 05:37 stupid C preprocessor question
2004-03-24 06:05 Re: stupid C preprocessor question
2004-03-24 15:44 Re: stupid C preprocessor question

Tapio Kelloniemi

2004-03-22 14:57 [c++] Missing strstream.h

tech

2004-03-29 19:17 {Filename?}

Theo de Raadt

2004-03-01 02:58 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 03:46 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 03:49 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 03:59 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 04:05 Re: gcc and compiling speed

Theodore Papadopoulo

2004-03-25 18:06 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)
2004-03-30 13:38 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report

Thomas Kunert

2004-03-19 08:11 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)

Thomas Veith

2004-03-18 22:17 gcc vectorizer/auto-parallelizer
2004-03-18 23:41 Re: gcc vectorizer/auto-parallelizer
2004-03-27 21:26 gcc-ss-3.5-20040327 / gcc 3.3.3 20040217 / icc on bench++

Tiago Stein

2004-03-28 23:19 Double abstract class Inheritance concern.

Timothy J. Wood

2004-03-04 05:54 [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?
2004-03-04 16:47 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?

tm_gccmail

2004-03-02 01:25 Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format?
2004-03-08 22:01 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly

Tom Crick

2004-03-04 20:13 Building GENERIC trees
2004-03-05 23:31 Re: Building GENERIC trees
2004-03-12 17:03 RE: Building GENERIC trees and passing the symbol table

Tom Tromey

2004-03-23 01:00 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc
2004-03-31 22:03 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump

Toon Moene

2004-03-06 19:15 Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for overa week.
2004-03-15 19:00 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-16 22:49 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 23:27 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-16 23:37 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-22 23:09 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7
2004-03-23 22:47 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 21:00 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-24 21:38 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-25 21:35 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!

Ulrich Drepper

2004-03-07 22:34 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double

Ulrich Weigand

2004-03-13 16:36 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double
2004-03-18 18:31 "no return statement" warning weirdness

via the vacation program

2004-03-23 20:49 This is not my email address any longer

Vincent Diepeveen

2004-03-01 04:23 Re: gcc and compiling speed

Vladimir N. Makarov

2004-03-26 20:06 Re: Register Allocation

Vladimir Prus

2004-03-17 15:22 explicit instantiation: function vs. class
2004-03-18 10:39 Re: explicit instantiation: function vs. class

Volker Reichelt

2004-03-30 23:59 [lno] bootstrap failure

Waldek Hebisch

2004-03-30 05:48 Should fold preserve types?

Weihaw Chuang

2004-03-09 23:38 Expr constructor question
2004-03-10 07:06 Re: Expr constructor question
2004-03-10 11:33 Question: automatic variable memory allocation
2004-03-13 01:51 Expr Constructor Question Part 2

William Ahern

2004-03-01 20:15 Re: gcc and compiling speed

William Reading

2004-03-01 02:40 Obsolete mn10200?

wilson k.j

2004-03-03 05:39 pthread issue...

Wolfgang Bangerth

2004-03-25 15:08 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-29 20:11 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report

Wolfgang Kuehn

2004-03-15 10:54 register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-16 11:50 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function
2004-03-16 14:18 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function

xyzzy

2004-03-30 09:48 Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses
2004-03-31 09:11 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses
2004-03-31 10:18 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses

Yuval Kfir

2004-03-03 09:49 Re: GCC 3.2 runs with glibc-2.2, crashes with glibc-2.3?

Zack Weinberg

2004-03-01 03:10 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 04:01 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 05:31 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 07:27 Re: gcc and compiling speed
2004-03-01 19:57 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 20:19 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 21:15 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-01 21:19 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME
2004-03-02 21:11 Re: RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c
2004-03-04 09:13 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-04 18:38 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?
2004-03-05 20:58 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?
2004-03-08 20:44 Re: Shebang
2004-03-09 04:14 Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59
2004-03-09 22:03 Copyright assignment from Motorola for Altivec testsuite?
2004-03-10 00:12 Re: PATCH RFA: Remove SUNOS4_SHARED_LIBRARIES
2004-03-11 07:19 Re: [Fwd: require gcc language syntax summary]
2004-03-16 01:00 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!
2004-03-16 02:47 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables
2004-03-16 02:56 Re: Question !!
2004-03-16 17:16 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 17:17 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 17:24 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
2004-03-16 19:03 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 19:39 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 21:03 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 23:48 Re: Building collect2 for C?
2004-03-16 23:51 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-19 20:59 Mainline regression - ICE c99-complit-2.c
2004-03-19 22:57 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-21 00:18 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-21 02:42 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2
2004-03-21 18:02 Re: PCH and exec-shield...
2004-03-21 18:03 Re: Patch for PR c/12373
2004-03-21 18:15 Re: 128-bit long long?
2004-03-21 18:17 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc
2004-03-21 21:11 Re: jFP religious wars
2004-03-23 19:40 Re: output binary
2004-03-23 20:01 Re: Exception and pthread on HPUX
2004-03-24 05:57 Re: stupid C preprocessor question
2004-03-24 06:44 Re: stupid C preprocessor question
2004-03-26 08:43 Re: Adding ggc_free to htab_create_ggc macro?
2004-03-31 09:41 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds
2004-03-31 14:41 Re: Your change to gengtype-yacc.y

Zbyszek Łuszpiński

2004-03-18 23:09 optmizing gcc 3.3.1 for AMD athlon xp

Zdenek Dvorak

2004-03-13 09:24 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer
2004-03-15 13:29 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 13:51 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 14:00 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-15 14:18 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!
2004-03-17 07:21 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question
2004-03-18 10:47 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal
2004-03-18 12:21 [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 12:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 13:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 15:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 16:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 16:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 17:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops
2004-03-18 21:11 Re: [lno] compute_immediate_uses in vectorizer causes ICE in pass_redundant_phi
2004-03-26 18:10 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
2004-03-31 06:29 Re: [lno] bootstrap failure

Zhu Chenyang

2004-03-11 04:42 [Fwd: require gcc language syntax summary]

Ziemowit Laski

2004-03-04 19:42 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?
2004-03-07 22:28 Re: Framework support for Linux
2004-03-08 19:13 Re: Framework support for Linux
2004-03-25 22:38 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for March, 2004

gcc archive
author index for March, 2004