This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 07:52:01 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <086B964A-7EC5-11D8-8C7F-000A95D7CD40@apple.com> <1080264779.4600.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1080304941.12447.4.camel@p4>

On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 07:42, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

> If the live range of SSA_NAMEs can overlap, why can't they overlap here?
> What are the arguments for dissallowing it?
> 
You're absolutely right.  I don't know what I was thinking.

Sorry Dale.  Disregard what I said.  I wasn't paying attention.  Is this
leading you to a codegen bug or a compiler abort?

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

References:
- [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right?
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]