This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
- Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, Philip Blundell <pb at nexus dot co dot uk>, Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org, gt at debian dot org, pb at debian dot org
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:23:13 +0000
- Subject: Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
> > I don't think there is a PR for it since the code in question does not
> > provoke the bug on a vanilla FSF build.
>
> Now I'm confused. If the bug is not present in 3.3.3, then what is there
> to backport?
The bug is present, by inspection.
> Or are you saying that the bug is present, but that this
> particular testcase doesn't tweak the bug because of some other difference
> between Debian's gcc and ours?
That seems to be the case.
R.