This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 128-bit long long?

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Richard dot Kreckel at ginac dot de
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:41:18 +0100
Subject: Re: 128-bit long long?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0403232222410.27895-100000@higgs.physik.uni-mainz.de>

Richard B. Kreckel wrote:

Hmmm, I've always believed that the next sentence ("However, if an
implementation provides integer types with widths of 8, 16, 32 or 64 bits,
it shall define the corresponding typedef names") is to be construed as a
*requirement* of these types on machines where they make sense.

I agree.

Paolo.

References:
- Re: 128-bit long long?
  - From: Richard B. Kreckel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]