This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed

From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 23 Mar 2004 23:41:54 -0300
Subject: Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed
Organization: Red Hat Global Engineering Services Compiler Team
References: <orad2at9s4.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><20040324004534.GA7171@redhat.com>

On Mar 23, 2004, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:

> Ug.  Ok I guess.  For the record, what ABI cares about this?

frv-*linux*.  IIRC, SH5 does as well.

> And does it *really* care about signed vs unsigned int?  Not
> just the enum thing?

Hmm...  I'm not sure, it's been a while since I wrote this patch
[tests] Yes, it does care about un/signed as well.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

References:
- make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]