gcc archive
date index for March, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2004
23:53 cc1 of nonexistent file still segfaults Daniel Berlin
23:48 Re: Exception handling HowTO?? Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
22:06 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) David Edelsohn
22:03 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump Tom Tromey
17:41 gcc-ss-3.4-20040331 is now available gccadmin
17:32 RE: problems with subversions.gcc.org Dave Korn
17:15 Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7) Joe Buck
17:12 problems with subversions.gcc.org George R Goffe
16:26 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Paul Koning
15:32 Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7) Eric Botcazou
15:31 Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7) Daniel Jacobowitz
15:29 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) David Edelsohn
14:42 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Mostafa Hagog
14:41 Re: Your change to gengtype-yacc.y Zack Weinberg
14:40 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Paolo Carlini
14:36 Your change to gengtype-yacc.y Richard Kenner
14:21 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Paolo Carlini
14:06 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Mostafa Hagog
13:49 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Paolo Carlini
13:37 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Andrew Pinski
13:05 Re: [RTL] -- How to insert code into functions? sashan
12:53 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Mostafa Hagog
12:43 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Paolo Carlini
12:42 Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7) Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:23 Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin) Mostafa Hagog
12:14 Re: Best way to create rtl code Jared Buttles
11:24 STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7) Eric Botcazou
11:09 [RTL] -- How to insert code into functions? 王 逸
10:52 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses Robert Dewar
10:49 Handling DWARF call frame labels in the middle of VLIW packets Daniel Towner
10:18 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses xyzzy
09:44 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses Richard Earnshaw
09:41 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds Zack Weinberg
09:40 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Gabriel Dos Reis
09:11 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses xyzzy
09:09 Re: Floating Point Exception Handling Andrew Haley
08:46 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Eric Botcazou
08:20 Re: new apple-ppc branch Mike Stump
08:09 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds Jim Wilson
08:03 Re: RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed Jim Wilson
07:55 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump Mark Wielaard
07:53 Re: RFC: failure of gcc.dg/funcorder.c on hppa64 Jim Wilson
07:43 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump Mark Wielaard
07:43 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Ashok.A
07:27 Re: RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed Jim Wilson
06:40 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump Ranjit Mathew
06:38 Re: No Subject Jim Wilson
06:29 Re: [lno] bootstrap failure Zdenek Dvorak
05:58 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds Jim Wilson
04:43 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds Nathanael Nerode
03:10 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds DJ Delorie
02:50 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds Jim Wilson
02:03 Re: Floating Point Exception Handling Joe Buck
01:48 Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump Jim Wilson
01:45 Re: Floating Point Exception Handling Jim Wilson
01:43 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds DJ Delorie
01:32 Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds Jim Wilson
01:15 Re: Code generation Jim Wilson

March 30, 2004
23:59 [lno] bootstrap failure Volker Reichelt
22:09 modification of g77 for default 64-bit integers on x86-64 Jiri Pittner
22:02 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Daniel Berlin
21:26 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Eric Botcazou
20:46 PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.5 Henrik Sorensen
20:31 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses Jim Wilson
20:03 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Richard Henderson
19:23 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses Joern Rennecke
19:19 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators Matt Austern
18:56 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Joe Buck
18:46 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Joe Buck
18:33 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Joern Rennecke
17:48 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Paul Koning
17:36 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Ashok.A
16:08 unobsoleting m88k Jason
16:07 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Sebastian Pop
15:09 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Ayal Zaks
14:02 Code generation Primrose.Mbanefo
13:38 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Theodore Papadopoulo
13:10 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Gabriel Dos Reis
12:56 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Gabriel Dos Reis
10:15 Re: GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches Eric Botcazou
09:48 Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses xyzzy
09:46 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization Andreas Schwab
09:39 Re: ld segfault when building objc source with pthread Nick Clifton
09:14 Re: GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches Christian Ehrhardt
08:18 [fortran] Results of g77 3.4.0 testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu poschmid
07:06 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Ian Lance Taylor
06:20 Re: Should fold preserve types? Mike Stump
06:13 Ping : H8/300 ABI Document Anil Paranjape
05:59 Re: Should fold preserve types? Andrew Pinski
05:48 Should fold preserve types? Waldek Hebisch
02:17 Re: Best way to create rtl code Jim Wilson
02:10 Re: Operator overloading in (MIPS) assembly-language Jim Wilson
01:56 Re: GCC: structure typedef compilation error Jim Wilson
01:46 Re: Any Question Jim Wilson
01:44 Re: No luck building GCC on sparc-linux using --with-gc=zone Jim Wilson
01:34 Re: String optimisations gone? Jim Wilson
01:20 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests Jim Wilson
01:16 Re: Register objects question Jim Wilson
00:57 Re: machine files from 2.95 to 3.2.3 Jim Wilson
00:53 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization Mike Stump
00:52 Re: Help writing RTL expression ? Jim Wilson
00:38 Re: 128-bit long long? Jim Wilson
00:29 Re: About RTL Jim Wilson
00:24 Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers Jim Wilson
00:21 Re: Can -frepo be used with PCH? Jim Wilson
00:20 Re: Is it possible to use libstdc++.so.5 with 3.4? Jim Wilson
00:20 Re: C++: Non-allowed exception diagnostic? Jim Wilson
00:11 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization Jim Wilson
00:06 Re: HP-UX Core Dump in stack unwinding Jim Wilson

March 29, 2004
23:58 Re: Exception handling HowTO?? Jim Wilson
23:22 Re: function template question sashan
23:01 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cacheoperation is required (?) Jim Wilson
21:12 fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds DJ Delorie
21:09 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Richard Guenther
20:39 function template question Glenn MacGregor
20:11 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Wolfgang Bangerth
19:17 {Filename?} tech
19:16 Re: glibc and inline functions Joseph S. Myers
18:57 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher
18:49 Re: GPL legal question Graeme Peterson
18:46 glibc and inline functions Scott Robert Ladd
18:44 Re: GPL legal question Joe Buck
18:14 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? H. J. Lu
17:47 Re: GPL legal question Andrew Haley
17:32 Re: GPL legal question Graeme Peterson
17:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20040329 is now available gccadmin
17:16 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Joe Buck
17:02 Re: GPL legal question Robert Dewar
16:50 GPL legal question Graeme Peterson
16:47 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Joe Buck
15:15 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing David Edelsohn
14:03 Re: bitfield-- != 0 still broken Michael Matz
13:57 GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:54 Re: bitfield-- != 0 still broken Falk Hueffner
13:46 bitfield-- != 0 still broken Michael Matz
10:30 RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus Dave Korn
07:57 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Nathan Sidwell
06:36 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Andrew Pinski
06:27 Re: Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc. Christian Joensson
05:59 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Michael Matz
02:21 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Alexandre Oliva
01:39 RE: Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Chris Lattner

March 28, 2004
23:19 Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Tiago Stein
18:40 Re: Warning on cast to const Andreas Schwab
13:50 Re: Warning on cast to const clifford
11:42 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Laurent GUERBY
11:06 Re: Warning on cast to const Falk Hueffner
10:52 Warning on cast to const clifford
07:17 ld segfault when building objc source with pthread Rogelio Serrano
07:07 Re: Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc. James Morrison
06:38 Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc. Christian Joensson
02:37 Re: new GCC mirror Gerald Pfeifer
00:33 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher

March 27, 2004
23:52 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Richard Kenner
22:10 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher
22:05 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher
21:56 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Richard Kenner
21:53 Re: Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add. David Huddart
21:46 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher
21:41 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Richard Kenner
21:37 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Geert Bosch
21:26 gcc-ss-3.5-20040327 / gcc 3.3.3 20040217 / icc on bench++ Thomas Veith
19:54 regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher
19:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed law
18:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed David Edelsohn
15:38 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Andrew Pinski
14:25 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus law
13:32 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Kelley Cook
12:25 [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed Christian Joensson
12:23 gcc-ss-3.5-20040327 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
11:25 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Arnaud Charlet
10:21 GCC-3.3.4 release status report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:28 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Ashok.A
07:07 PR 14400--PCH problem with large files Ian Lance Taylor
06:02 Re: Register Allocation Andi Kleen
02:39 Re: [PATCH] GCC Warning Options Documentation Gerald Pfeifer
02:01 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus Diego Novillo
01:51 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Richard Kenner
01:35 Re: PATCH for Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Gerald Pfeifer
01:28 PATCH for Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Gerald Pfeifer
01:26 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus Ian Lance Taylor
01:16 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Roger Sayle
00:58 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Joe Buck
00:55 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Robert Dewar
00:50 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Robert Dewar
00:48 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Dale Johannesen
00:48 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Robert Dewar
00:42 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Robert Dewar
00:41 RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus Diego Novillo
00:40 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
00:36 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
00:23 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
00:11 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Laurent GUERBY

March 26, 2004
23:53 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
23:20 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Laurent GUERBY
22:43 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Laurent GUERBY
22:32 Re: sdbout.c tree check error DJ Delorie
22:27 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Richard Henderson
22:26 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? H. J. Lu
22:22 Re: sdbout.c tree check error Richard Kenner
22:21 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Laurent GUERBY
22:21 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Daniel Egger
22:12 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? H. J. Lu
22:08 Enable 128bit soft-fp for ia32 and ia64? H. J. Lu
21:48 Re: new apple-ppc branch Mike Stump
21:09 Re: sdbout.c tree check error Ian Lance Taylor
21:03 sdbout.c tree check error DJ Delorie
20:19 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Chris Lattner
20:18 Re: Register Allocation Andrew MacLeod
20:15 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Chris Lattner
20:06 Re: Register Allocation Vladimir N. Makarov
19:54 Register Allocation John Lu
19:03 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Joseph S. Myers
18:51 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Joe Buck
18:49 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Laurent GUERBY
18:46 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Devang Patel
18:37 Floating Point Exception Handling John L. Kulp
18:37 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering law
18:33 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Joe Buck
18:22 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Dale Johannesen
18:22 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Robert Dewar
18:18 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Fariborz Jahanian
18:10 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Richard Guenther
18:10 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Zdenek Dvorak
18:08 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Dale Johannesen
17:48 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Diego Novillo
17:42 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Joe Buck
16:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24 law
16:40 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Robert Dewar
16:38 Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for singlemultiply add. Joseph S. Myers
16:31 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-24 Diego Novillo
16:21 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering law
16:12 mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 David Edelsohn
16:06 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? law
15:39 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Andrew MacLeod
15:30 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? law
15:30 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Diego Novillo
15:28 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? law
13:34 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Andrew MacLeod
13:06 RE: structure typedef compilation error Dave Korn
12:52 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Diego Novillo
12:42 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Andrew MacLeod
12:24 GCC: structure typedef compilation error Aniket S Joshi
11:20 RE: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Dave Korn
08:43 Re: Adding ggc_free to htab_create_ggc macro? Zack Weinberg
07:27 Re: new apple-ppc branch Andreas Jaeger
07:08 Re: Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ? Bernd Jendrissek
06:35 Re: Disqualifying instructions for branch delay slot scheduling Eric Botcazou
06:34 Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Ashok.A
05:32 Extreme Markup Languages Conference 2004 Steve Newcomb
05:12 Adding ggc_free to htab_create_ggc macro? Daniel Berlin
04:29 gij 3.3.3 core dump Steven Augart
03:17 Re: Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:51 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Bradley Lucier
02:41 Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add. Bradley Lucier
02:01 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Andrew Pinski
02:01 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Diego Novillo
01:58 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Dale Johannesen
01:33 Re: [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Diego Novillo
01:29 [tree-ssa vs lno] who is right? Dale Johannesen
00:01 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken Kaveh R. Ghazi

March 25, 2004
23:29 Disqualifying instructions for branch delay slot scheduling Barry Wealand
23:25 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Jakub Jelinek
23:17 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Gabriel Paubert
22:54 invalid_mode_change_p again... Aldy Hernandez
22:47 Best way to create rtl code Jared Buttles
22:38 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken Ziemowit Laski
22:35 Mainline bootstrap broken Steven Bosscher
22:05 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4 Aldy Hernandez
21:35 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Toon Moene
21:34 mainline broken on x86-linux? Laurent GUERBY
21:02 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Laurent GUERBY
20:47 Re: m68k-linux regressions Jim Wilson
20:46 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests Chris Proctor
20:45 Re: [tree-ssa] Debugging information issue. Jan Hubicka
20:42 Should ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN honor __attribute__((packed))? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:40 new apple-ppc branch Mike Stump
20:16 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Chris Proctor
20:11 Re: [tree-ssa] Debugging information issue. Daniel Berlin
19:51 [tree-ssa] Debugging information issue. Andrew MacLeod
19:47 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Scott Robert Ladd
19:43 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Joe Buck
19:43 new GCC mirror Jan Teluch
19:40 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests Laurent GUERBY
19:35 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Scott Robert Ladd
19:24 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Joe Buck
19:19 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Dan Nicolaescu
19:14 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Scott Robert Ladd
18:59 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Geert Bosch
18:58 Re: It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself? Richard Henderson
18:54 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Laurent GUERBY
18:47 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Joost VandeVondele
18:46 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests Bauke van Dijk
18:38 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Scott Robert Ladd
18:32 Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin. Bauke van Dijk
18:28 RE: Register objects question Dave Korn
18:19 Register objects question Jared Buttles
18:18 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus Dale Johannesen
18:12 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus Paul Jarc
18:09 RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus Dave Korn
18:06 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Theodore Papadopoulo
18:03 Question for ISO C standards gurus law
17:58 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Dale Johannesen
17:47 RE: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Dave Korn
17:20 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
17:09 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Joe Buck
16:51 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Per Abrahamsen
16:38 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Per Abrahamsen
16:36 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Scott Robert Ladd
16:22 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Joseph S. Myers
16:18 Re: Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ? Joseph S. Myers
16:15 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
16:12 GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Scott Robert Ladd
15:59 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! David Edelsohn
15:32 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? H. J. Lu
15:18 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
15:08 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Wolfgang Bangerth
15:07 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Scott Robert Ladd
15:04 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! David Edelsohn
14:45 Re: Does var tracking allow debuggable -frename-registers? Josef Zlomek
14:29 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Jakub Jelinek
14:28 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Roger Sayle
14:24 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Paul Koning
14:23 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Scott Robert Ladd
14:21 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Joost VandeVondele
13:45 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Robert Dewar
13:21 Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:06 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Joost VandeVondele
12:43 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Arnaud Charlet
12:37 Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Robert Dewar
12:03 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Chris Proctor
11:55 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Laurent GUERBY
11:31 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Arnaud Charlet
11:29 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Laurent GUERBY
11:27 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Laurent GUERBY
10:22 Does var tracking allow debuggable -frename-registers? Paolo Bonzini
08:46 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Arnaud Charlet
08:28 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Chris Proctor
08:18 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Arnaud Charlet
07:29 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Robert Dewar
07:24 (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c) Joost VandeVondele
06:40 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Ben Elliston
06:14 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Ian Lance Taylor
06:07 re: [c++] Missing strstream.h Dan Kegel
06:05 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Robert Dewar
06:03 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Robert Dewar
05:56 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
05:45 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
05:41 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
05:36 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
05:34 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
05:34 It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself? Kazu Hirata
05:31 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
02:55 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Bradley Lucier
01:23 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Ian Lance Taylor
01:07 -ffast-math and floating point reordering Joe Buck
00:22 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
00:11 Successful bootstrap: gcc-3.3.3/sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Choa-lin Chou
00:05 Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin. Gabriel Dos Reis
00:02 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis

March 24, 2004
23:48 Re: [Fwd: Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.] Gabriel Dos Reis
23:01 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Gerald Pfeifer
22:54 How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? H. J. Lu
22:49 Re: problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function Stephane Carrez
22:21 Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin. Kelley Cook
22:20 [Fwd: Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.] Bauke van Dijk
22:19 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Roger Sayle
21:44 No luck building GCC on sparc-linux using --with-gc=zone Art Haas
21:38 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Toon Moene
21:07 Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin. Bauke van Dijk
21:00 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Toon Moene
20:57 Re: problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function Eljay Love-Jensen
20:14 problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function n f
19:50 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joseph S. Myers
19:45 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Dale Johannesen
19:43 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Dale Johannesen
19:39 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Richard Guenther
19:29 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
19:23 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
19:14 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joseph S. Myers
19:12 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
19:10 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paul Brook
19:10 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paul Koning
19:04 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
18:58 RE: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Dave Korn
18:56 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Bradley Lucier
18:53 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paul Brook
18:51 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
18:50 String optimisations gone? Dave Korn
18:40 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Richard Guenther
18:40 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and streeversion of enumerators Gerald Pfeifer
18:29 Re: CVSROOT/modules bug Paolo Carlini
18:25 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
18:22 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Bradley Lucier
18:04 CVSROOT/modules bug Serge Belyshev
18:02 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
17:47 gcc-ss-3.4-20040324 is now available gccadmin
16:35 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
16:28 2.95 to 3.2.3 Feranando Roberto Secco
15:44 Re: stupid C preprocessor question Steven G. Kargl
15:39 large file support in g++ Gareth Williams
14:42 Re: Making -ffast-math more fine-grained? Roger Sayle
13:50 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paul Koning
13:27 Re : - -- - ------ - Nicolas Poubetier
10:51 Any Question 김명수
08:17 Re: stupid C preprocessor question Robert Dewar
06:44 Re: stupid C preprocessor question Zack Weinberg
06:05 Re: stupid C preprocessor question Steven G. Kargl
05:57 Re: stupid C preprocessor question Zack Weinberg
05:38 Re: Making -ffast-math more fine-grained? Andrew Pinski
05:37 stupid C preprocessor question Steven G. Kargl
05:20 Making -ffast-math more fine-grained? Nathanael Nerode
03:32 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
02:42 Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed Alexandre Oliva
00:46 Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed Richard Henderson

March 23, 2004
22:47 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Toon Moene
22:10 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? Arnaud Charlet
22:08 Re: darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem Mike Stump
21:41 Re: 128-bit long long? Paolo Carlini
21:35 Re: 128-bit long long? Richard B. Kreckel
21:28 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Mark Mitchell
21:00 Re: darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem Laurent GUERBY
20:50 Re: [Newb] Stepping into gnat Laurent GUERBY
20:49 This is not my email address any longer via the vacation program
20:49 Re: darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem Mike Stump
20:38 Re: [Newb] Stepping into gnat Sebastian Pop
20:36 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers David Edelsohn
20:20 Re: simplejump_p does not recognise jumps in parallel rtx Joern Rennecke
20:01 Re: Exception and pthread on HPUX Zack Weinberg
19:58 Re: darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem Andrew Pinski
19:48 darwin-powerpc compiler/linker problem Laurent GUERBY
19:44 Re: Exception and pthread on HPUX Joe Buck
19:40 Re: output binary Zack Weinberg
19:38 Re: Exception and pthread on HPUX Mark Mitchell
19:37 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Laurent GUERBY
19:24 Re: output binary Diego Novillo
19:23 Re: output binary Dale Johannesen
19:20 output binary FOSTER,MARK S
19:06 Re: Request for bugzilla submitters/maintainers: "Reportad against" field Giovanni Bajo
18:58 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
18:55 Re: Request for bugzilla submitters/maintainers: "Reportad against" field Joe Buck
18:48 Re: Request for bugzilla submitters/maintainers: "Reportad against"field Daniel Berlin
18:36 Request for bugzilla submitters/maintainers: "Reportad against" field Joe Buck
17:51 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck
17:31 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Jan Hubicka
17:25 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:10 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Jan Hubicka
17:03 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Jan Hubicka
16:10 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Daniel Jacobowitz
14:27 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? Christian Joensson
12:52 Re: how to get gcc-3.3.3.tar.gz Gabriel Dos Reis
12:27 how to get gcc-3.3.3.tar.gz Peter Korosec
11:29 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? Arnaud Charlet
11:28 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? Laurent GUERBY
09:55 RE: ABI Document Anil Paranjape
08:52 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Mark Mitchell
08:51 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Mark Mitchell
08:40 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos
07:38 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? Arnaud Charlet
06:43 Re: lno new optimization options Dorit Naishlos
01:08 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc sashan
01:00 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Tom Tromey
00:37 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Alexandre Oliva
00:18 simplejump_p does not recognise jumps in parallel rtx d9910490

March 22, 2004
23:48 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? H. J. Lu
23:39 Operator overloading in (MIPS) assembly-language Barry Wealand
23:09 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Toon Moene
22:46 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? Laurent GUERBY
21:59 machine files from 2.95 to 3.2.3 Feranando Roberto Secco
21:52 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? H. J. Lu
21:15 Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? Scott Robert Ladd
18:57 Re: lno new optimization options Dorit Naishlos
18:45 Re: lno new optimization options Serge Belyshev
18:33 Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64? H. J. Lu
18:30 Re: [RFC] [tree-ssa] Fix handling of BIT_FIELD_REFs andVECTOR_TYPEs Diego Novillo
18:27 Re: [RFC] [tree-ssa] Fix handling of BIT_FIELD_REFs andVECTOR_TYPEs Paolo Bonzini
18:21 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Richard Henderson
17:45 gcc-ss-3.3-20040322 is now available gccadmin
17:31 Re: lno new optimization options Sebastian Pop
17:12 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge Diego Novillo
17:11 lno new optimization options Serge Belyshev
17:04 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge Richard Kenner
16:34 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge Diego Novillo
16:33 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge law
16:32 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge Richard Kenner
15:27 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge Diego Novillo
15:24 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge Richard Kenner
15:23 Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge Diego Novillo
15:05 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Dave Korn
14:57 [c++] Missing strstream.h Tapio Kelloniemi
14:19 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Eric Botcazou
14:12 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Balaji Srinivasa
13:57 Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge Richard Kenner
13:25 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Robert Dewar
12:45 RE: malloc mutex and exceptions Dave Korn
11:37 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Jan Hubicka
08:06 Help writing RTL expression ? Petar Penchev
08:03 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Segher Boessenkool
07:56 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Robert Dewar
07:48 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Segher Boessenkool
07:43 Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1 Eric Botcazou
06:03 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc Alan Modra
05:16 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc llewelly
04:30 Re: jFP religious wars Robert Dewar
04:00 Re: jFP religious wars R. D. Flowers
03:35 Re: jFP religious wars Gabriel Dos Reis
02:39 Re: jFP religious wars Robert Dewar
02:38 Re: jFP religious wars Robert Dewar
02:08 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:27 Re: m68k-linux regressions Bernardo Innocenti
00:49 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Alexandre Oliva
00:12 RE: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)

March 21, 2004
23:07 Re: m68k-linux regressions Matthias Klose
21:42 Re: m68k-linux regressions Bernardo Innocenti
21:20 Re: jFP religious wars R. D. Flowers
21:11 Re: jFP religious wars Zack Weinberg
21:03 jFP religious wars R. D. Flowers
21:02 DOM doesn't notice some equivalences through phis Daniel Berlin
20:52 Re: gcc Digest 21 Mar 2004 05:08:56 -0000 Issue 3435 R. D. Flowers
20:30 Re: m68k-linux regressions Richard Zidlicky
20:27 GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Mark Mitchell
19:37 Re: 128-bit long long? Paolo Carlini
19:29 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Richard Henderson
19:24 malloc mutex and exceptions Ignasi Villagrasa
19:22 Re: 128-bit long long? Scott Robert Ladd
19:21 Re: 128-bit long long? Joseph S. Myers
19:10 PL/1 Frontend for GCC v0.0.4 Henrik Sorensen
18:17 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc Zack Weinberg
18:15 Re: 128-bit long long? Zack Weinberg
18:14 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Eric Botcazou
18:08 Re: 128-bit long long? Erik Trulsson
18:03 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Zack Weinberg
18:02 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Zack Weinberg
17:37 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc Andreas Jaeger
17:34 Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc H. J. Lu
17:22 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Andreas Schwab
17:00 make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed Alexandre Oliva
16:56 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Paolo Bonzini
16:55 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Alexandre Oliva
16:11 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:03 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:49 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill
15:46 Re: 128-bit long long? Paolo Carlini
15:35 Re: 128-bit long long? Andreas Jaeger
15:28 128-bit long long? Scott Robert Ladd
13:02 Re: Requested documentation update [contribution] Ian Lance Taylor
12:36 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Eric Botcazou
11:58 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Giovanni Bajo
08:49 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
07:17 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Eric Botcazou
06:41 RE: Requested documentation update [contribution] Stephan T. Lavavej
05:25 RFC: failure of gcc.dg/funcorder.c on hppa64 John David Anglin
05:08 Requested documentation update [contribution] James Southard_Jr
02:42 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Zack Weinberg
02:04 About RTL 王 逸
01:59 about RTL 王 逸
01:47 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Robert Dewar
00:36 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Andrew Pinski
00:18 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Zack Weinberg

March 20, 2004
23:58 Re: Endless loop during bootstrap? James Morrison
23:56 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Andrew Pinski
23:25 Re: Endless loop during bootstrap? Eric Christopher
23:08 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Robert Dewar
22:35 Endless loop during bootstrap? James Morrison
22:08 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos
22:07 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos
21:56 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Ian Lance Taylor
21:06 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Paul Koning
20:51 Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1 James Morrison
20:41 sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1 James Morrison
19:51 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill
18:46 RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed Steven Bosscher
18:09 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Richard Henderson
15:01 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Jan Hubicka
14:51 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Ian Lance Taylor
13:59 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Andreas Schwab
11:17 Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers Shinpei Kato
11:11 [MIPS] reduce floating point registers Shinpei Kato
11:03 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
09:06 D-loop : new way for optimizing loop with branch condition d-loop
08:02 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Paolo Bonzini
06:48 gcc3.3.2 Dominik Pajak
05:00 LLVM 1.2 Release! Chris Lattner
05:00 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Stephan T. Lavavej
04:53 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Alexandre Oliva
04:50 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Phil Edwards
04:29 Is it possible to use libstdc++.so.5 with 3.4? r6144
04:11 [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc sashan
04:06 Can -frepo be used with PCH? r6144
03:46 m68k-linux regressions Bernardo Innocenti
03:39 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Stephan T. Lavavej
02:56 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW llewelly
01:41 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Stephan T. Lavavej
01:17 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization Ian Lance Taylor
01:09 [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization sashan
00:56 C++: Non-allowed exception diagnostic? Frank Pilhofer
00:51 Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Stephan T. Lavavej

March 19, 2004
23:12 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Phil Edwards
23:02 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
23:00 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Ian Lance Taylor
22:57 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Zack Weinberg
22:56 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Ian Lance Taylor
22:54 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Dale Johannesen
22:44 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Andrew Pinski
22:38 Re: [Newb] Building 3.4 Eric Christopher
22:34 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Ian Lance Taylor
22:18 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Balaji Srinivasa
22:12 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Dale Johannesen
22:09 [Newb] Building 3.4 sashan
22:06 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Balaji Srinivasa
21:57 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Balaji Srinivasa
21:40 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Andrew Pinski
21:30 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Kai Henningsen
21:02 Re: Mainline regression - ICE c99-complit-2.c Richard Kenner
21:02 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Eric Botcazou
20:59 Mainline regression - ICE c99-complit-2.c Zack Weinberg
20:23 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Richard Henderson
20:08 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Richard Kenner
20:04 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Richard Henderson
20:04 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Balaji Srinivasa
19:59 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Paul Koning
19:49 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Richard Henderson
19:29 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Eric Botcazou
18:57 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dale Johannesen
18:48 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Mark Mitchell
18:41 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner
18:31 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Balaji Srinivasa
18:28 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
18:11 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Gabriel Paubert
17:55 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Dave Korn
17:38 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Mark Mitchell
17:24 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Joern Rennecke
17:07 Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com Michael Koch
17:05 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Dave Korn
17:02 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Joern Rennecke
16:59 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Douglas B Rupp
16:48 Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com Remco Rijnders
16:47 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Dave Korn
16:46 Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com Daniel Berlin
16:28 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Arnaud Charlet
16:25 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill
16:20 Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com Michael Koch
16:10 Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Bonzini
15:58 Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Joern Rennecke
15:56 email/mail server woes for bothner.com Per Bothner
15:48 HP-UX Core Dump in stack unwinding Michael GZ
15:30 How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Dave Korn
15:01 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Eric Botcazou
14:52 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Segher Boessenkool
14:45 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Nathan Sidwell
14:31 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Jamie Lokier
14:22 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Segher Boessenkool
14:18 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Segher Boessenkool
14:14 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Balaji Srinivasa
13:53 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Jamie Lokier
13:47 Re: optmizing gcc 3.3.1 for AMD athlon xp Kelley Cook
13:11 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Richard Kenner
13:08 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Arnaud Charlet
13:06 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
12:33 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner
12:31 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Richard Kenner
12:28 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill
12:18 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill
11:30 Re: latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3 Phil Edwards
11:19 Re: license of libmudflap? Frank Ch. Eigler
10:18 Re: [For "zlomek": Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender] Josef Zlomek
09:18 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Arnaud Charlet
08:45 Re: latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3 Ralf Corsepius
08:31 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Jim Wilson
08:26 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Jakub Jelinek
08:14 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Jakub Jelinek
08:11 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Thomas Kunert
07:53 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Arnaud Charlet
06:42 latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3 Phil Edwards
06:34 Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Eric Botcazou
06:09 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers David Edelsohn
05:46 Re: license of libmudflap? Andreas Jaeger
05:33 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Phil Edwards
04:42 [For "zlomek": Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender] Bruce Korb
03:11 Citeseer's replacement? Scott A Crosby
02:30 RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7 Balaji Srinivasa
02:04 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Mark Mitchell
01:23 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner

March 18, 2004
23:58 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
23:43 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill
23:41 Re: gcc vectorizer/auto-parallelizer Thomas Veith
23:36 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Jakub Jelinek
23:29 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
23:09 optmizing gcc 3.3.1 for AMD athlon xp Zbyszek Łuszpiński
22:40 Re: gcc vectorizer/auto-parallelizer Scott Robert Ladd
22:17 gcc vectorizer/auto-parallelizer Thomas Veith
21:45 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness Joseph S. Myers
21:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Alex Rosenberg
21:28 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness Richard Henderson
21:11 Re: [lno] compute_immediate_uses in vectorizer causes ICE in pass_redundant_phi Zdenek Dvorak
20:55 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness Chris Lattner
20:52 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness Neil Booth
20:45 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness Chris Lattner
20:38 Re: "no return statement" warning weirdness Neil Booth
20:07 Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding Jim Wilson
19:56 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Jim Wilson
19:18 Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding Otto Bruggeman
19:15 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Roger Sayle
18:46 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Mark Mitchell
18:40 RE: Compiling gcc 3.3.3 on solaris 2.6 Balaji Srinivasa
18:37 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Jan Hubicka
18:31 "no return statement" warning weirdness Ulrich Weigand
18:23 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
18:11 Re: Compiling gcc 3.3.3 on solaris 2.6 Eric Botcazou
17:49 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Dale Johannesen
17:30 x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Roger Sayle
17:25 RE: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Dave Korn
17:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Zdenek Dvorak
16:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Steven Bosscher
16:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Geert Bosch
16:38 Compiling gcc 3.3.3 on solaris 2.6 Balaji Srinivasa
16:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Zdenek Dvorak
16:34 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Richard Sandiford
16:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Geert Bosch
16:30 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Diego Novillo
16:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Richard Henderson
16:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Zdenek Dvorak
16:23 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Richard Henderson
16:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Joseph S. Myers
16:18 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
15:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Zdenek Dvorak
15:32 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Geert Bosch
15:32 Exception handling HowTO?? Jan Hoogerbrugge
15:26 [lno] compute_immediate_uses in vectorizer causes ICE in pass_redundant_phi Dorit Naishlos
15:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Paolo Carlini
14:51 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
14:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Richard Guenther
14:40 Heads up re: shared register rtx in regno_reg_rtx Dave Korn
14:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Diego Novillo
14:24 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help ildar
14:15 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill
14:03 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:43 RE: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Dave Korn
13:21 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help Joern Rennecke
13:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Paolo Carlini
13:13 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Zdenek Dvorak
13:11 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help Joern Rennecke
12:54 Successful build of gcc-3.3.3 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f Arnold Vogelsang
12:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Steven Bosscher
12:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Zdenek Dvorak
12:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Steven Bosscher
12:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Paolo Carlini
12:21 [tree-ssa] Dce & infinite loops Zdenek Dvorak
11:03 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Richard Sandiford
10:47 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Zdenek Dvorak
10:45 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem] Andreas Schwab
10:39 Re: explicit instantiation: function vs. class Vladimir Prus
10:33 Re: license of libmudflap? law
10:18 license of libmudflap? Andreas Jaeger
10:14 RE: Oh my god, it's full of NULLs Dave Korn
09:57 Re: Newb question about code style Robert Dewar
09:43 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem] Gunther Nikl
09:37 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help ildar
09:11 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Arnaud Charlet
08:25 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Jim Wilson
08:19 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
08:08 Re: Oh my god, it's full of NULLs Jim Wilson
07:59 Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding Jim Wilson
07:49 Re: powerpc-*-elf versus powerpc-*-eabi Jim Wilson
01:02 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
00:13 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Richard Henderson

March 17, 2004
23:22 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Jan Hubicka
22:59 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem] Jim Wilson
22:45 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
22:42 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
22:35 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
22:27 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem] Richard Zidlicky
22:19 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Daniel Berlin
22:18 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question David Edelsohn
22:11 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
22:11 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Eric Christopher
22:02 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Joseph S. Myers
21:59 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal David Edelsohn
21:56 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal David Edelsohn
21:54 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Diego Novillo
21:40 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Richard Guenther
21:32 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal David Edelsohn
21:05 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Richard Henderson
20:58 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Diego Novillo
20:10 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem] Jim Wilson
20:06 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal law
19:56 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal David Edelsohn
19:56 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Scott Robert Ladd
19:46 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal Daniel Berlin
19:38 Re: LNO Branch merge proposal law
19:23 LNO Branch merge proposal David Edelsohn
19:19 Oh my god, it's full of NULLs Dave Korn
19:09 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Devang Patel
18:49 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Daniel Berlin
18:47 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mike Stump
18:46 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
18:44 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
18:42 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
18:21 Exception and pthread on HPUX Michael GZ
18:19 Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding H. J. Lu
18:11 Exception and pthread on HPUX Michael GZ
17:57 Re: Proposed standard scheme for maintainers' debugging code Sebastian Pop
17:37 gcc-ss-3.4-20040317 is now available gccadmin
17:09 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Andrew MacLeod
17:05 Re: Newb question about code style Ian Lance Taylor
16:40 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Chris Lattner
16:05 Re: explicit instantiation: function vs. class Giovanni Bajo
15:55 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Per Abrahamsen
15:54 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Mark Mitchell
15:43 IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding Otto Bruggeman
15:36 gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill
15:29 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:22 explicit instantiation: function vs. class Vladimir Prus
15:18 Re: Newb question about code style Bernd Jendrissek
15:17 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
15:13 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
15:12 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
14:59 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
14:51 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
13:13 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Per Abrahamsen
13:05 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
12:51 RE: Newb question about code style Dave Korn
12:50 Re: [Savannah-hackers] Savannah down Paul Smith
12:43 RE: Savannah down Andrew Haley
12:38 RE: Warning on dangerous use of assert() ? Dave Korn
12:35 RE: Savannah down Dave Korn
12:28 Warning on dangerous use of assert() ? hartmut . schirmer
12:23 Re: RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations? Joern Rennecke
12:22 Re: Newb question about code style Nathan Sidwell
12:21 Re: Newb question about code style sashan
12:20 Re: Newb question about code style Paul Brook
12:16 Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem] Gunther Nikl
12:13 Re: Newb question about code style sashan
12:02 Newb question about code style Andrew Haley
12:00 Savannah down Andrew Haley
11:58 Newb question about code style sashan
11:49 Savannah down Dave Korn
11:02 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
10:56 [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem] Richard Zidlicky
10:55 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
10:55 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators Paolo Carlini
10:46 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators Ranjit Mathew
10:28 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
09:10 Re: Building collect2 for C? Andris Pavenis
08:08 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
07:21 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Zdenek Dvorak
07:10 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
06:45 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and streeversion of enumerators Andreas Jaeger
06:37 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators Matt Austern
06:05 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu Andrew Pinski
05:53 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu Mark Mitchell
04:39 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
04:35 Re: 3.3/3.4/head (was: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535) Gabriel Dos Reis
03:39 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators Mark Mitchell
03:32 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
03:30 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
03:00 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Ian Lance Taylor
02:55 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Ian Lance Taylor
02:51 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Ian Lance Taylor
02:18 Re: Building collect2 for C? Ian Lance Taylor
01:49 Proposed standard scheme for maintainers' debugging code Nathanael Nerode
01:30 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mike Stump
01:19 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Richard Henderson
00:55 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Phil Edwards
00:55 Re: Building collect2 for C? DJ Delorie
00:52 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
00:51 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Devang Patel
00:44 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Phil Edwards
00:44 Re: Building collect2 for C? Stephan T. Lavavej
00:36 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
00:31 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
00:30 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Stephan T. Lavavej
00:28 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
00:19 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
00:09 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
00:07 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar

March 16, 2004
23:55 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Kai Henningsen
23:51 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Zack Weinberg
23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
23:48 Re: Building collect2 for C? Zack Weinberg
23:44 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators Matt Austern
23:42 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question law
23:37 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Toon Moene
23:33 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
23:28 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Eric Christopher
23:27 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Toon Moene
23:22 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Richard Henderson
23:20 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables Joe Buck
23:18 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Devang Patel
23:13 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
23:12 GCC 3.3.3 build status for Solaris 2.5.1 on x86 Dennis Clarke
23:10 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Joseph S. Myers
23:10 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Kai Henningsen
23:10 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Kai Henningsen
23:10 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Kai Henningsen
23:08 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Devang Patel
23:07 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Richard Henderson
23:06 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Richard Henderson
23:02 Re: Building collect2 for C? E. Weddington
22:58 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
22:57 3.3/3.4/head (was: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535) Gerald Pfeifer
22:57 Re: Building collect2 for C? DJ Delorie
22:51 Re: Building collect2 for C? E. Weddington
22:49 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Toon Moene
22:46 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Eric Christopher
22:45 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
22:44 Re: Building collect2 for C? DJ Delorie
22:40 Re: Building collect2 for C? Mike Stump
22:37 Re: Building collect2 for C? E. Weddington
22:32 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mark Mitchell
22:31 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Devang Patel
22:20 RE: Building collect2 for C? Dave Murphy
22:17 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
22:15 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mike Stump
22:01 Re: Building collect2 for C? DJ Delorie
22:00 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Devang Patel
21:56 Re: Building collect2 for C? Phil Edwards
21:51 Re: Building collect2 for C? DJ Delorie
21:47 Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Diego Novillo
21:40 [tree-ssa] reaching def. question Devang Patel
21:37 Re: Building collect2 for C? Phil Edwards
21:18 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch Jim Wilson
21:03 Re: Building collect2 for C? Zack Weinberg
21:01 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch Joel Sherrill
20:36 Re: Building collect2 for C? DJ Delorie
20:31 Re: Building collect2 for C? Mike Stump
20:14 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch Jim Wilson
20:00 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables Mike Stump
19:57 Re: asm memory barrier question Falk Hueffner
19:50 Undeliverable Email Administrator
19:43 Re: RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations? Dale Johannesen
19:39 Re: Building collect2 for C? Zack Weinberg
19:22 Re: Building collect2 for C? Joe Buck
19:20 Re: Building collect2 for C? Joe Buck
19:17 Re: Building collect2 for C? DJ Delorie
19:03 Re: Building collect2 for C? Zack Weinberg
18:34 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Richard Henderson
18:33 Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation Richard Kenner
18:32 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
18:17 Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation Geert Bosch
18:05 Re: Building collect2 for C? E. Weddington
17:54 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Nathan Sidwell
17:47 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
17:44 Re: Building collect2 for C? DJ Delorie
17:35 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Eric Christopher
17:25 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Paul Koning
17:24 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Zack Weinberg
17:17 Re: Building collect2 for C? Zack Weinberg
17:16 Re: Building collect2 for C? Zack Weinberg
17:14 RE: Building collect2 for C? Dave Murphy
17:12 Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help Joern Rennecke
17:11 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Ian Lance Taylor
16:59 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Paul Koning
16:59 Re: Building collect2 for C? E. Weddington
16:58 Re: Building collect2 for C? E. Weddington
16:53 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Mark Mitchell
16:45 Re: Building collect2 for C? Andrew Pinski
16:42 RE: Building collect2 for C? Dave Murphy
16:38 Re: Building collect2 for C? Ian Lance Taylor
16:33 Re: Building collect2 for C? E. Weddington
16:25 powerpc-*-elf versus powerpc-*-eabi Dave Murphy
16:10 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
15:45 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch Joel Sherrill
15:24 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables law
15:08 Re: Building collect2 for C? David Edelsohn
15:03 Re: Moving from mcpu to march/mtune everywhere? Kelley Cook
14:59 Re: Building collect2 for C? Ian Lance Taylor
14:54 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
14:47 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Ian Lance Taylor
14:22 Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help ildar
14:18 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Wolfgang Kuehn
14:18 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
14:05 asm memory barrier question jhjk jhj
13:31 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Jakub Jelinek
13:31 Building collect2 for C? E. Weddington
13:21 RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Dave Korn
13:05 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Joseph S. Myers
13:00 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Ian Lance Taylor
12:43 RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Dave Korn
12:39 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Michael Matz
12:34 RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations? Joern Rennecke
12:32 Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation Richard Kenner
12:30 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Michael Matz
12:27 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Robert Dewar
12:14 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
11:50 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Wolfgang Kuehn
10:30 gcc for Texas Instruments DSP 64xx Rakesh Avichal Ughreja
10:20 RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Dave Korn
09:36 Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation Jim Wilson
09:19 Re: -fdump-translation-unit[-option] Jim Wilson
09:12 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Nathan Sidwell
09:02 The account for daniele has been removed [Re: Re: excuse me] anonymous NFS user
09:02 Re: Expr Constructor Question Part 2 Jim Wilson
09:00 Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch Jim Wilson
08:57 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Jim Wilson
08:48 Re: multilib and with/without exceptionsand rtti Jim Wilson
08:45 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Per Abrahamsen
06:54 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
06:33 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel
05:33 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Robert Dewar
05:14 Moving from mcpu to march/mtune everywhere? Nathanael Nerode
04:57 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Richard Henderson
04:34 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mark Mitchell
04:15 Re: PCH and exec-shield... David Edelsohn
03:46 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Chris Lattner
03:36 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mike Stump
03:33 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
03:12 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Eric Christopher
03:02 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo
02:56 Re: Question !! Zack Weinberg
02:47 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables Zack Weinberg
02:45 Question !! 김명수
02:15 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables Mike Stump
02:09 C++ status (Was: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)) Giovanni Bajo
01:46 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Mike Stump
01:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Nathanael Nerode
01:08 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
01:00 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Zack Weinberg
00:45 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
00:37 libstdc++ (was Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!) Kevin Atkinson
00:13 Re: locking problem with mips atomicity Phil Edwards
00:07 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo
00:02 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel

March 15, 2004
23:57 locking problem with mips atomicity Michael Eager
23:20 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
23:08 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
23:08 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel
22:51 Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Richard Henderson
22:42 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Robert Dewar
22:38 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
22:24 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Christian Groessler
22:18 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Andreas Schwab
22:17 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Ian Lance Taylor
22:14 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Andreas Schwab
22:02 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Christian Groessler
20:52 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Jamie Lokier
20:41 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:39 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Joseph S. Myers
20:25 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Jamie Lokier
20:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status David Edelsohn
19:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Eric Botcazou
19:50 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
19:44 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Laurent GUERBY
19:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Andreas Tobler
19:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Andrew Pinski
19:00 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Toon Moene
18:22 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Dan Nicolaescu
18:14 Re: possible regression... where to look at? Dmitry
18:13 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Joe Buck
18:12 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in (poorly designed) trig test! Nathanael Nerode
18:01 C++ Front-end or inliner bug with tree-ssa law
17:58 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
17:53 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Phil Edwards
17:52 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Joe Buck
17:50 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Nathan Sidwell
17:48 gcc-ss-3.3-20040315 is now available gccadmin
17:47 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
17:46 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Geert Bosch
17:45 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Joe Buck
17:44 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Geert Bosch
17:42 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Joe Buck
17:28 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Ian Lance Taylor
17:15 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Paolo Carlini
17:10 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
16:59 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
16:56 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Paolo Carlini
16:46 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Ian Lance Taylor
16:41 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
16:40 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Jakub Jelinek
16:30 Re: Bad mode-change inside subreg: DImode to SImode Julian Brown
16:25 RE: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Stephan T. Lavavej
16:06 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar
15:54 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Nathan Sidwell
15:40 Re: PR java/14581: gcj internal error: Segmentation fault involvingswitch to a final var Cedric Berger
15:36 PR java/14581: gcj internal error: Segmentation fault involving switch to a final var Andrew Haley
15:35 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
15:20 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Nathan Sidwell
15:19 Re:[tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage ? Hartmut Penner
15:11 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Ian Lance Taylor
15:09 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu Paolo Carlini
15:01 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu Giovanni Bajo
14:49 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
14:47 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Segher Boessenkool
14:43 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu Paolo Carlini
14:29 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Segher Boessenkool
14:28 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joseph S. Myers
14:18 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Zdenek Dvorak
14:13 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paolo Carlini
14:05 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joseph S. Myers
14:03 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Nathan Sidwell
14:00 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Zdenek Dvorak
13:56 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline destabilizing tree-ssa? Diego Novillo
13:55 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paolo Carlini
13:51 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Zdenek Dvorak
13:50 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
13:42 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paolo Carlini
13:37 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
13:29 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Zdenek Dvorak
13:28 [tree-ssa] mainline destabilizing tree-ssa? Richard Guenther
13:15 Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu Paolo Carlini
12:53 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
12:40 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
12:05 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Stelios Xanthakis
11:46 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Nathan Sidwell
11:46 Re: IWMMXT vector type alignment Richard Earnshaw
11:43 IWMMXT vector type alignment Paul Brook
11:31 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paolo Carlini
11:26 statement expressions and extended asm bug? Gunther Nikl
11:25 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paolo Carlini
10:54 register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function Wolfgang Kuehn
10:19 Re: C++ language lawyer question Gabriel Dos Reis
10:00 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Sebastian Pop
09:54 Re: C++ language lawyer question Nathan Sidwell
09:37 Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu poschmid
08:57 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
08:20 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Jakub Jelinek
07:42 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Ranjit Mathew
06:56 gctest failure for 3.5-tree-ssa 20040314 (merged 20040307) on cygwin: KERNEL32!IsBadWritePtr Christian Joensson
06:06 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Andreas Jaeger
05:50 tree-ssa performance from rebuild_jump_labels's view Kazu Hirata
05:15 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! James Morrison
04:44 -fdump-translation-unit[-option] J. Buchanan
04:06 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
03:29 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
03:19 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Stephan T. Lavavej
03:05 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
03:01 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
02:41 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
02:41 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:38 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
02:36 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
02:31 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Daniel Berlin
02:30 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
02:29 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Alex Rosenberg
02:22 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Dan Nicolaescu
02:07 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Daniel Berlin
01:55 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Roger Sayle
01:47 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
01:47 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
01:31 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
00:32 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Paolo Carlini
00:12 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Andrew Pinski
00:11 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Paolo Carlini

March 14, 2004
23:49 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis
23:40 GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd
22:31 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Daniel Berlin
22:15 Re: gcc and compiling speed Gerald Pfeifer
22:12 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:22 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Andrew Pinski
18:23 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Ian Lance Taylor
18:09 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Christian Groessler
10:59 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Dorit Naishlos
10:57 Fw: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Dorit Naishlos
01:58 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Richard Henderson
01:56 Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again) Gerald Pfeifer
01:37 Re: possible regression... where to look at? Roger Sayle
00:56 Re: Two places in GCC doing (float)func(x) -> funcf(x) ?? Roger Sayle

March 13, 2004
23:05 Two places in GCC doing (float)func(x) -> funcf(x) ?? Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:41 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel
21:25 Re: possible regression... where to look at? Richard Sandiford
20:59 Re: Basic g++ Compiler Question llewelly
20:10 Bad mode-change inside subreg: DImode to SImode Julian Brown
16:36 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Ulrich Weigand
16:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Andreas Jaeger
15:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Jan Hubicka
15:54 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Richard Guenther
15:47 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Gerald Pfeifer
15:44 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Richard Guenther
15:41 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Diego Novillo
15:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Richard Guenther
15:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Diego Novillo
15:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Diego Novillo
15:05 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Richard Guenther
14:57 Re: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in3.5-tree-ssa 040120 Diego Novillo
14:57 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Paolo Bonzini
14:47 Basic g++ Compiler Question FGales
12:34 Re: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in3.5-tree-ssa 040120 Richard Guenther
10:17 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Jakub Jelinek
09:24 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Zdenek Dvorak
03:30 GCC-3.3.4 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
01:51 Expr Constructor Question Part 2 Weihaw Chuang
00:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status Diego Novillo
00:07 [tree-ssa] Merge status Diego Novillo

March 12, 2004
23:30 Re: possible regression... where to look at? Richard Henderson
22:37 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Dale Johannesen
22:24 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Andreas Schwab
21:49 Re: GCC version compatible problem Eric Christopher
21:25 signed/unsigned right shift Christian Groessler
20:18 Re: GCC version compatible problem Joseph S. Myers
20:09 Re: GCC version compatible problem Eric Christopher
20:05 Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0 Kelley Cook
19:47 Re: GCC version compatible problem Lu Peng
19:41 Re: GCC version compatible problem Kazu Hirata
19:26 GCC version compatible problem Lu Peng
18:56 Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0 Joseph S. Myers
18:45 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel
18:35 Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0 Christopher Faylor
18:31 weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
18:21 Re: Restrict pointers Diego Novillo
18:17 Re: Restrict pointers Dan Nicolaescu
17:38 Re: Restrict pointers Diego Novillo
17:24 Re: Building GENERIC trees and passing the symbol table Paul Brook
17:23 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Richard Earnshaw
17:18 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Joe Buck
17:18 Re: Restrict pointers Dan Nicolaescu
17:17 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Phil Blundell
17:12 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Joe Buck
17:03 RE: Building GENERIC trees and passing the symbol table Tom Crick
17:02 Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:51 [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0 Kelley Cook
16:50 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Phil Blundell
16:46 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Joe Buck
16:00 Re: Restrict pointers Diego Novillo
15:58 Re: Restrict pointers Daniel Berlin
15:45 Re: Restrict pointers Diego Novillo
15:28 Re: Restrict pointers Jan Hoogerbrugge
13:21 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Gerhard Tonn
12:44 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Philip Blundell
12:26 possible regression... where to look at? Dmitry
12:08 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Richard Earnshaw
10:44 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Philip Blundell
09:57 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Andreas Schwab
06:58 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Gabriel Dos Reis
06:42 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Matthias Klose
03:14 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers David Edelsohn
02:49 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Ian Lance Taylor

March 11, 2004
23:58 3.3.4 status, and some questions Joe Buck
23:31 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Richard Henderson
22:52 Re: functexcept.cc draws in everything Henning dot Baldersheim at dev
22:38 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers David Edelsohn
22:17 Re: PATCH RFA: Remove SUNOS4_SHARED_LIBRARIES (Was collect2.c hardcoded paths) Richard Henderson
22:16 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra? Gerald Pfeifer
21:11 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Henderson
21:00 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code Richard Henderson
20:17 Re: thread enabled ecos support Henning Baldersheim
19:47 Re: Restrict pointers Jim Wilson
19:26 multilib and with/without exceptionsand rtti Henning Baldersheim
19:26 Re: new/delete mismatch Jim Wilson
19:23 Re: GCC3.3.3: building cross compiler powerpc-linux undefined symbol Jim Wilson
18:45 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code Max Asbock
15:01 info fredy . pena
14:09 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
13:48 TYPE_VFIELD documentation Richard Kenner
12:49 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner
12:48 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Jakub Jelinek
12:39 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
12:15 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner
09:45 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou
07:19 Re: [Fwd: require gcc language syntax summary] Zack Weinberg
04:42 [Fwd: require gcc language syntax summary] Zhu Chenyang
02:16 Re: more hardcoded paths Jim Wilson
02:06 Re: genrecog of i386.md under linux, 5 warnings... Jim Wilson

March 10, 2004
23:42 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Gabriel Dos Reis
22:22 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Richard Henderson
22:01 new/delete mismatch Cheng, Cheuk
19:41 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code Richard Henderson
18:37 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Richard Henderson
18:35 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Paul Koning
18:31 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Andrew Haley
18:22 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Richard Henderson
17:57 GCC3.3.3: building cross compiler powerpc-linux undefined symbol Gazelle Jean-Laurent
17:31 gcc-ss-3.4-20040310 is now available gccadmin
17:29 Re: sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
16:06 Re: Question on valid transformations for cbrt Robert Dewar
15:36 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Linus Torvalds
15:32 Re: Question on valid transformations for cbrt Segher Boessenkool
15:13 Re: Question: automatic variable memory allocation Ian Lance Taylor
15:11 Re: sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c Ralf Corsepius
14:35 Re: Expr constructor question Ian Lance Taylor
14:14 Re: sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
13:25 Re: sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c Ralf Corsepius
13:16 sparc-rtems defines unix and ada/sysdep.c Joel Sherrill
13:03 More aggressive --gc-sections Eric Botcazou
11:33 Question: automatic variable memory allocation Weihaw Chuang
10:30 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Gabriel Dos Reis
10:15 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Joseph S. Myers
10:13 full space, this user is limit quota market
09:19 Restrict pointers Jan Hoogerbrugge
08:21 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Gabriel Dos Reis
08:05 Re: C++ language lawyer question Gabriel Dos Reis
07:06 Re: Expr constructor question Weihaw Chuang
06:39 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Neil Booth
05:49 Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const' Richard Henderson
04:47 C++ language lawyer question Albert Chin
04:45 Re: [tree-ssa] abort in stabilize_call Andrew Pinski
04:17 [tree-ssa] abort in stabilize_call law
02:26 more hardcoded paths Edward S. Peschko
02:18 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code Jim Wilson
02:05 Re: Questions about the instruction selection for sse2 intrinsicwith -O optimization Jim Wilson
01:58 Re: Question about GCC -O optimization with sse2 programming. Jim Wilson
01:55 Re: GCC3.3.3 Successful build in ia64-hpux11.23(hp rx5670) Jim Wilson
01:52 Re: Questions about the instruction selection for sse2 intrinsic with -O optimization Giovanni Bajo
01:52 Re: Proposal: fine-grained control over -Werror Jim Wilson
01:49 Re: thread enabled ecos support Jim Wilson
01:42 Re: [reload] never-used stack slots? Jim Wilson
01:02 Re: local vars transmission (fwd) Jim Wilson
00:15 Re: Expr constructor question Ian Lance Taylor
00:12 Re: PATCH RFA: Remove SUNOS4_SHARED_LIBRARIES Zack Weinberg
00:04 PATCH RFA: Remove SUNOS4_SHARED_LIBRARIES (Was collect2.c hardcoded paths) Ian Lance Taylor

March 09, 2004
23:38 Expr constructor question Weihaw Chuang
22:50 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables Joe Buck
22:47 Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables Joe Buck
22:35 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
22:30 Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables Matt Austern
22:03 Copyright assignment from Motorola for Altivec testsuite? Zack Weinberg
21:32 Re: handling of FIXED_REGISTERS Ian Lance Taylor
21:29 Re: handling of FIXED_REGISTERS Andreas Schwab
21:17 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Matthias Benkmann
20:04 handling of FIXED_REGISTERS Olatunji Ruwase
19:47 collect2.c hardcoded paths Edward S. Peschko
19:15 "make check" faulures in glibc with gcc 3.4 H. J. Lu
18:59 Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59 Alexandre Oliva
18:49 genrecog of i386.md under linux, 5 warnings... Christian Joensson
18:46 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers David Edelsohn
18:38 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Falk Hueffner
18:09 GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Mark Mitchell
18:03 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459:warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function Mark Mitchell
17:46 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
17:37 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
17:26 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
16:20 Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459: warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function Christian Joensson
16:17 Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459: warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function Christian Joensson
14:00 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Gabriel Dos Reis
12:11 Re: request for a copyright assignment Nick Clifton
11:54 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
11:14 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
10:42 Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59 Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:41 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
09:59 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
09:39 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
08:57 request for a copyright assignment Petko Manolov
08:40 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Gunther Nikl
08:15 Re: attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler Richard Sandiford
08:03 RE: gcc and arm interworking Dave Murphy
06:51 Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again) Ranjit Mathew
04:14 Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59 Zack Weinberg
03:43 Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59 Benjamin Kosnik
03:36 Questions about the instruction selection for sse2 intrinsic with -O optimization haibo
03:22 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Gabriel Dos Reis
03:21 Move mainline to autoconf 2.59 Kelley Cook
03:17 Question about GCC -O optimization with sse2 programming. haibo
03:15 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Paul Jarc
03:09 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Gabriel Dos Reis
02:53 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Paul Jarc
02:52 GCC3.3.3 Successful build in ia64-hpux11.23(hp rx5670) 이규호
02:43 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Gabriel Dos Reis
01:37 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
01:06 Re: attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler Eric Christopher
00:54 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joe Buck
00:49 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
00:34 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
00:17 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
00:07 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen

March 08, 2004
23:43 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
23:32 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joe Buck
23:07 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Gabriel Dos Reis
22:57 Re: Shebang Andreas Schwab
22:51 Re: Shebang cgd
22:49 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
22:46 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
22:46 Re: Shebang Paul Jarc
22:37 Re: Shebang cgd
22:33 Re: Shebang Paul Jarc
22:32 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
22:32 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Jamie Lokier
22:29 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
22:24 Re: Shebang cgd
22:21 Re: LD vs multilibs Alexandre Oliva
22:01 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly tm_gccmail
21:45 Re: You ucLinux patches break RTEMS building Bernardo Innocenti
21:38 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
21:34 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mark Mitchell
21:27 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases Mark Mitchell
21:13 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Ian Lance Taylor
21:04 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mark Mitchell
20:51 Re: Shebang Ian Lance Taylor
20:49 Re: Shebang Paul Jarc
20:44 Re: Shebang Zack Weinberg
20:24 Shebang Leah
19:34 Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again) Gerald Pfeifer
19:27 New development branch: stree-branch Matt Austern
19:18 problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code Max Asbock
19:13 Re: Framework support for Linux Ziemowit Laski
18:09 attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler Roy Franz
18:08 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-07 Diego Novillo
17:20 gcc-ss-3.3-20040308 is now available gccadmin
16:31 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Gunther Nikl
14:34 Proposal: fine-grained control over -Werror Omer Shenker
11:38 Re: Building GENERIC trees Lars Segerlund
10:39 Re: gcc and arm interworking Richard Earnshaw
10:24 3.5 Snapshots (Again) Ranjit Mathew
07:51 LD vs multilibs Phil Edwards
06:42 thread enabled ecos support Henning Baldersheim
01:28 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double GOTO Masanori

March 07, 2004
23:52 Re: Framework support for Linux Andrew Pinski
23:22 ppc LE broken. anybody care? Aldy Hernandez
22:34 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Ulrich Drepper
22:28 Re: Framework support for Linux Ziemowit Laski
18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Aldy Hernandez
18:30 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Aldy Hernandez
18:30 Away from email Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
15:11 Re: Question on valid transformations for cbrt Roger Sayle
15:05 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
05:58 [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Richard Henderson
03:54 Stop Spreading Hatred SAR
03:05 Re: gcc and arm interworking Ian Lance Taylor
02:57 gcc and arm interworking Dave Murphy

March 06, 2004
20:26 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Jamie Lokier
19:52 Re: Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for over a week. Richard Henderson
19:38 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Andi Kleen
19:27 Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem Richard Henderson
19:26 Re: Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for over a week. Andrew Pinski
19:15 Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for overa week. Toon Moene
18:58 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Jamie Lokier
18:54 Question on valid transformations for cbrt Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:41 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Andi Kleen
18:01 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Jamie Lokier
15:31 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Matthew Tippett
12:58 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Andi Kleen
06:06 Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Matthew Tippett
03:00 local vars transmission (fwd) Mihai Burcea
02:59 local vars transmission Mihai Burcea
02:43 The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 is released H. J. Lu

March 05, 2004
23:48 [tree-ssa] mini merge Diego Novillo
23:31 Re: Building GENERIC trees Tom Crick
23:25 m68k, extendqidi2 problem Richard Zidlicky
22:26 Re: Building GENERIC trees Kai Henningsen
21:35 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue Gabriel Dos Reis
20:58 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Zack Weinberg
20:36 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Jim Wilson
20:26 [reload] never-used stack slots? Cyrille Chepelov
19:58 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue Jim Wilson
19:45 Re: init_integral_libfuncs question Richard Henderson
19:44 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo
19:41 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo
19:28 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel
19:22 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo
19:17 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo
19:06 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel
18:23 Re: Building GENERIC trees Paul Brook
18:11 Re: Building GENERIC trees law
17:15 init_integral_libfuncs question Steve Ellcey
17:08 Re: binutils 2.15.90.0.1 break ia64 kernel crosscompiling H. J. Lu
16:19 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2 cgd
15:46 Re: Taking a stab at register-relative data addressing on m68k... Peter Barada
14:58 TOP 50 de la liberté - - - -- -- - - Marc Buglonnier - - - -- -- -
14:47 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue Andrew Haley
14:07 Taking a stab at register-relative data addressing on m68k... Ray Whitmer
10:42 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases perugupa
10:15 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases Segher Boessenkool
09:15 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2 Eric Christopher
08:29 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2 Mile Davidovic
07:54 gcc support for mips32 release 2 Long Li
05:48 Re: FUNCTION_BOUNDARY and FUNCTION_TYPE Geoff Keating
04:27 Re: Declaring Arrays Giovanni Bajo
04:05 Re: support for omvs Edward S. Peschko
03:51 Declaring Arrays Nuwan Kodagoda
03:32 FUNCTION_BOUNDARY and FUNCTION_TYPE Richard Kenner
03:24 Re: support for omvs David Edelsohn
03:10 support for omvs Edward S. Peschko
01:50 Re: My code wont compile in GCC Eric Christopher
01:42 My code wont compile in GCC Jonathan Wilson
00:23 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dale Johannesen
00:06 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos

March 04, 2004
23:52 Re: Logging data structure field accesses Robert Bowdidge
23:38 Re: PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expressionin ".if" statement Daniel Kegel
23:34 Re: PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement Andrew Pinski
23:19 PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expressionin ".if" statement Daniel Kegel
23:06 Re: Help with writing RTL for RISC CPU Richard Henderson
22:51 Help with writing RTL for RISC CPU David Addison
22:46 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Andreas Schwab
21:49 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? H. J. Lu
21:46 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases Daniel Jacobowitz
21:46 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Daniel Jacobowitz
21:43 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? H. J. Lu
21:10 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases Jim Wilson
21:03 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Richard Henderson
21:02 Re: constant pool issues Jim Wilson
20:53 Re: Porting GCC Toolchain Jim Wilson
20:48 Re: Intrinsic support without -sse2 Richard Henderson
20:45 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "+m" constraints in inline asm Jim Wilson
20:39 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel
20:23 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Richard Kenner
20:21 Re: pthread issue... Jim Wilson
20:20 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Eric Botcazou
20:13 Building GENERIC trees Tom Crick
20:12 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Andrew Pinski
20:08 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Joe Buck
20:03 Re: Logging data structure field accesses (Mozilla-friendly) Mike Capp
20:00 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Eric Botcazou
19:59 [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel
19:42 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Ziemowit Laski
19:17 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Joe Buck
18:45 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Zidlicky
18:38 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
18:38 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Zack Weinberg
18:27 Re: Logging data structure field accesses Joe Buck
18:07 Re: Logging data structure field accesses Andrew Pinski
18:02 Re: Logging data structure field accesses law
17:53 Successful bootstrap: 3.3.3/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9 (64-bit) Chuck Cox
17:21 Re: binutils 2.15.90.0.1 doesn't install as.1 man page H. J. Lu
17:11 Re: Why doesn't Ada testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Arnaud Charlet
16:47 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Timothy J. Wood
16:04 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? H. J. Lu
15:48 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-03 Diego Novillo
15:32 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Gunther Nikl
13:45 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Roman Zippel
13:27 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
10:58 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Gunther Nikl
10:47 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Robert Dewar
09:36 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Arnaud Charlet
09:35 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Arnaud Charlet
09:13 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Zack Weinberg
09:10 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Rolf Ebert
08:01 Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? Arnaud Charlet
07:25 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Gunther Nikl
07:08 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Andrew Pinski
05:54 [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Timothy J. Wood
05:30 Re: Porting GCC Toolchain Ranjit Mathew
04:53 Intrinsic support without -sse2 Matthew Tippett
03:03 i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases perugupa
00:50 Re: [tree-ssa] 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4 Per Bothner
00:35 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Henderson
00:00 Re: IA64 GCC bootstrap problem Steve Ellcey

March 03, 2004
23:13 The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.1 is released H. J. Lu
22:38 IA64 GCC bootstrap problem Steve Ellcey
22:38 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
21:58 constant pool issues Mihai Burcea
21:55 Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake? H. J. Lu
19:30 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Mark Mitchell
19:23 Re: bug report with downloaded copiler Joe Buck
19:14 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Eric Christopher
19:09 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Mark Mitchell
19:06 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Richard Sandiford
19:04 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
18:44 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dale Johannesen
18:39 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Eric Christopher
18:37 bug report with downloaded copiler Nathan Holladay
18:37 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Eric Christopher
18:33 Re: installing gcc on HP UX 11 Jim Wilson
18:27 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue Jim Wilson
18:16 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos
18:12 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
17:52 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers David Edelsohn
17:49 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Mark Mitchell
17:34 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
17:18 gcc-ss-3.4-20040303 is now available gccadmin
16:49 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Alexandre Oliva
16:46 rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos
15:39 Porting GCC Toolchain mbroadst
15:34 Re: [tree-ssa] c++/14408 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4 Diego Novillo
15:28 Re: [tree-ssa] c++/14408 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4 Richard Guenther
14:46 [tree-ssa] 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4 Richard Guenther
14:44 Clarification Req: Regarding "+m" constraints in inline asm Ashok.A
14:23 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Richard Sandiford
13:27 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Zidlicky
12:39 [gnu.org #27612] Request for copyright assignment form Arpad Beszedes
11:37 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
11:08 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
11:03 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Andreas Schwab
10:13 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Roman Zippel
10:04 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue Andrew Haley
09:49 Re: GCC 3.2 runs with glibc-2.2, crashes with glibc-2.3? Yuval Kfir
08:53 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
08:22 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
08:20 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Mark Mitchell
08:15 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Jim Wilson
08:09 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Mark Mitchell
08:08 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Mark Mitchell
08:03 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Jim Wilson
08:01 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Jim Wilson
07:48 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Richard Henderson
07:47 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Eric Christopher
07:38 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Eric Christopher
07:25 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Mark Mitchell
07:01 Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Eric Christopher
05:39 pthread issue... wilson k.j
04:04 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Ian Lance Taylor
03:53 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Alexandre Oliva
03:05 Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ? Mark Mitchell
01:51 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
01:21 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
00:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
00:57 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
00:52 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
00:39 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Dale Johannesen
00:33 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Richard Henderson
00:33 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Robert Dewar
00:31 Re: g++ 3.5.0 and tree-ssa parse problem: incomplete types Alexandre Oliva
00:30 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Alexandre Oliva
00:27 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Alexandre Oliva
00:23 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Dale Johannesen
00:09 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Richard Henderson
00:08 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final (sorry, wrong subject) Jim Wilson

March 02, 2004
23:50 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue Jim Wilson
23:37 Re: GCC 3.2 runs with glibc-2.2, crashes with glibc-2.3? Jim Wilson
23:33 g++ 3.5.0 and tree-ssa parse problem: incomplete types Kedar Namjoshi
23:24 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Daniel Berlin
23:10 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
22:54 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Alexandre Oliva
22:26 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Zidlicky
21:32 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Henderson
21:24 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final George Garvey
21:11 Re: RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c Zack Weinberg
21:01 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Geoff Keating
21:00 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Geoff Keating
20:58 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Matt Austern
20:51 sucessful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.3 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Kate Minola
20:49 sucessful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.3 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 Kate Minola
20:45 Re: RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c Danny Smith
20:17 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Ian Lance Taylor
20:09 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Jakub Jelinek
19:59 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Ian Lance Taylor
19:55 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Jakub Jelinek
19:33 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Roman Zippel
19:25 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Giovanni Bajo
19:22 Re: PCH and exec-shield... law
19:05 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Eric Christopher
19:02 PCH and exec-shield... David Daney
18:45 [tree-ssa] merge completed Richard Henderson
18:19 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Henderson
17:33 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
17:22 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Jan Hubicka
17:18 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
17:11 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Jan Hubicka
17:04 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
16:59 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Alexandre Oliva
16:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan (IA64 bootstrap) Steve Ellcey
15:46 installing gcc on HP UX 11 Olivier . Polit
14:03 3.4 speed improvements Richard Guenther
12:34 Re: [PATCH] Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory Gunther Nikl
12:15 Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory Eric Botcazou
11:12 [PATCH] Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory Jakub Jelinek
10:56 Re: [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory Jakub Jelinek
10:42 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Gunther Nikl
10:19 [3.3/3.4/3.5 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory Andrew Haley
10:01 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Nathan Sidwell
09:14 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Zidlicky
07:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan law
06:36 Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format? Meg Abyte
06:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Jim Wilson
06:06 Re: Unnamed Structure declaration Jim Wilson
02:48 Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format? Ian Lance Taylor
01:47 Re: building gcc-3.4 with mingw/msys Jim Wilson
01:40 Re: RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c Richard Kenner
01:29 Re: RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c Jim Wilson
01:25 Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format? tm_gccmail
01:11 Re: Why is my executabel in DOS file format? Jim Wilson
00:25 Re: [patch] Re: recount_dominator Jim Wilson
00:18 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
00:09 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
00:07 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
00:03 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell

March 01, 2004
23:58 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Chris Lattner
23:26 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
23:05 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Robert Dewar
22:54 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Geoff Keating
22:34 09.KK. john holmes ..... YOU Junior Smith
22:30 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Andreas Schwab
22:21 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Chris Lattner
22:05 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Zidlicky
22:03 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
21:48 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Dale Johannesen
21:46 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Geoff Keating
21:45 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
21:41 Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...) Daniel Berlin
21:40 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
21:40 Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...) Daniel Berlin
21:22 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
21:19 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Geoff Keating
21:19 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Zack Weinberg
21:15 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Zack Weinberg
21:02 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Dale Johannesen
20:58 Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project Joe Buck
20:58 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Kevin Atkinson
20:57 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
20:37 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
20:33 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Jan Hubicka
20:33 Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project Christopher Faylor
20:27 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
20:25 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
20:24 Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project Russ Allbery
20:21 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Geoff Keating
20:20 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Jan Hubicka
20:19 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Zack Weinberg
20:18 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
20:16 Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project Michael Stather
20:15 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Richard Zidlicky
20:15 Re: gcc and compiling speed William Ahern
20:11 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
20:09 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
20:05 Re: gcc and compiling speed Peter Galbavy
19:57 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Zack Weinberg
19:57 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
19:51 Re: gcc and compiling speed Andreas Jaeger
19:48 Re: retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++ Geoff Keating
19:48 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
19:47 Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Geoff Keating
19:47 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? H. J. Lu
19:40 Re: gcc and compiling speed Peter Galbavy
19:39 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Jeff Sturm
19:34 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Chris Lattner
19:14 Re: inernal compiler error gavinband
19:11 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
19:10 Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME Mark Mitchell
19:05 RE: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final (sorry, wrong subject) Cheng, Cheuk
19:03 RE: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Cheng, Cheuk
19:00 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Joe Buck
18:57 Re: GCC bootstrap. Joe Buck
18:56 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
18:45 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
18:34 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Joe Buck
18:22 Re: retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++ Joe Buck
18:19 Re: inernal compiler error Joe Buck
17:31 gcc-ss-3.3-20040301 is now available gccadmin
17:16 Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...) Ian Lance Taylor
17:08 inernal compiler error gavinband
17:02 Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bugc++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...) Diego Novillo
16:56 Re: Wrong code and ICEs on valid PRs Eric Botcazou
16:53 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? H. J. Lu
15:51 Re: Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location Christopher Faylor
15:44 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:04 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Nathan Sidwell
15:02 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Gabriel Dos Reis
14:51 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Jeff Sturm
14:45 gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue Andrew Haley
14:39 retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++ Michael Matz
14:24 Unnamed Structure declaration Rob . McConnell
13:51 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Per Abrahamsen
13:25 Re: Your software japetersen
10:20 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Nathan Sidwell
10:04 Successful build of gcc-3.3.3 on mips-sgi-irix6.5 Julian R. Parramore
10:03 Successful build of gcc-3.3.2 on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0e Julian R. Parramore
09:17 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Allan Sandfeld
08:12 Re: Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location Andrew Pinski
08:09 Re: gcc and compiling speed Steven Bosscher
08:06 Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location Christian Joensson
08:04 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Kevin Atkinson
08:03 Re: __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc3.4.0 Michael Matz
07:27 Re: gcc and compiling speed Zack Weinberg
07:05 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Alexandre Oliva
06:15 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Kevin Atkinson
06:14 Re: Munging gcc-testresults@ messages James Morrison
06:00 Re: gcc and compiling speed Andreas Jaeger
05:31 Re: gcc and compiling speed Zack Weinberg
05:18 GCC Status Report (2004-02-29) Mark Mitchell
05:12 Re: Obsolete mn10200? law
05:04 Wrong code and ICEs on valid PRs Mark Mitchell
05:00 Re: gcc and compiling speed John S. Dyson
04:39 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
04:23 Re: gcc and compiling speed Vincent Diepeveen
04:20 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4 Aldy Hernandez
04:15 Re: gcc and compiling speed Daniel Berlin
04:14 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
04:11 Re: gcc and compiling speed Eric Christopher
04:05 Re: gcc and compiling speed Theo de Raadt
04:01 Re: gcc and compiling speed Zack Weinberg
04:00 Re: gcc and compiling speed Eric Christopher
04:00 Re: gcc and compiling speed Gabriel Dos Reis
03:59 Re: gcc and compiling speed Theo de Raadt
03:55 Re: gcc and compiling speed Gabriel Dos Reis
03:49 Re: gcc and compiling speed Theo de Raadt
03:46 Re: gcc and compiling speed Theo de Raadt
03:10 Re: gcc and compiling speed Zack Weinberg
03:07 Re: gcc and compiling speed Daniel Jacobowitz
03:00 Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4 Andrew Pinski
02:58 Re: gcc and compiling speed Theo de Raadt
02:54 gcc 3.3.3 built on PowerPC Mac OS X 10.3.2 7D24/Darwin 7.2.0 Hunter Horsman
02:40 Obsolete mn10200? William Reading
02:32 Problems with cp_expr_size and friends in GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
02:29 Vector problems with GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
01:29 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Daniel Jacobowitz
01:19 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Al Stone
01:12 Munging gcc-testresults@ messages Al Stone
01:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Diego Novillo
00:46 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? H. J. Lu
00:43 gcc and compiling speed Andrew Pinski
00:41 Re: __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc 3.4.0 Giovanni Bajo


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3