This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: new/delete mismatch

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: "Cheng, Cheuk" <cheng at powertv dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 11:26:21 -0800
Subject: Re: new/delete mismatch
References: <762C0A863A7674478671627FEAF584812D7A4F@hqmail01.powertv.com>

Cheng, Cheuk wrote:

Hi, I am using sparc-elf-gcc 2.95.3 and it looks like there are cases
where objects will call new for new data, using our overloaded operator
new as expected, but when the element is deleted, the system delete
(__builtin_delete) is called on the data. I do not believe that this is

See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for info on how to report bugs. In particular, we need a sample testcase that we can compile. We probably can't do anything with the code fragments that you have provided. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

References:
- new/delete mismatch
  - From: Cheng, Cheuk

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]