gcc archive
author index for April, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

"하태준"

2005-04-01 06:39 i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end

聂久焘

2005-04-23 10:32 A bug in the current released GCC 4.0.0

Øystein Johansen

2005-04-15 22:01 Vectorizing my loops. Some problems.
2005-04-15 22:29 Re: Vectorizing my loops. Some problems.
2005-04-20 15:17 Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?
2005-04-20 18:50 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?
2005-04-25 22:30 Where did the include files go?

Øyvind Harboe

2005-04-07 16:12 How to "disable" register allocation?
2005-04-07 21:37 Re: How to "disable" register allocation?
2005-04-18 12:46 i386 stack slot optimisation
2005-04-18 18:44 i386 stack slot optimisation
2005-04-19 22:12 Re: i386 stack slot optimisation
2005-04-20 06:49 Re: i386 stack slot optimisation

Björn Haase

2005-04-03 08:12 Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR
2005-04-03 14:02 Sorry for the noise: Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR
2005-04-07 22:16 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-07 23:25 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-17 13:02 Re: The subreg question
2005-04-17 14:15 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-17 15:39 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-17 16:48 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-19 19:50 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-19 23:04 Unnesting of nested subreg expressions
2005-04-21 08:11 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions
2005-04-21 10:13 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-22 21:56 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions

François Mainguy

2005-04-04 18:14 Cross-compiling for PPC405 core...

Mattias Engdegård

2005-04-02 17:52 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?

Tobias Schlüter

2005-04-17 05:10 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze

Branko Äibej

2005-04-17 02:56 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-17 03:33 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze

FranÃois-Xavier Coudert

2005-04-14 14:42 Processor-specific code
2005-04-14 15:28 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 07:32 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-18 06:57 Re: Processor-specific code

BjÃrn Haase

2005-04-03 17:08 Re: Sorry for the noise: Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR

RenÃ Rebe

2005-04-03 18:06 4.0-20050319 / 4-020050402 build error due to --enable-mapped location

Aaron Gaudio

2005-04-05 20:05 Re: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 -> SparcSolaris 10 (& others)...
2005-04-06 13:25 RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 ->SparcSolaris 10 (& others)...

Aaron Wilcox

2005-04-24 22:53 GCC 4.0.0 bootstrap success

Adrian von Bidder

2005-04-22 07:59 gpg signatures on tar/diff

Aldy Hernandez

2005-04-04 11:03 Re: SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt
2005-04-18 14:35 missed mail

Alec Voropay

2005-04-20 15:25 Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html

Alexandre Oliva

2005-04-04 21:33 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-04 22:22 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-04 22:57 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-11 19:34 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-11 19:55 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-11 20:42 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-12 05:09 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-12 06:26 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-14 15:14 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-14 18:22 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-15 02:32 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-15 06:53 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 07:54 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-26 22:07 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
2005-04-26 22:20 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0

Amir Fuhrmann

2005-04-27 21:11 FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin
2005-04-28 16:53 RE: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin
2005-04-30 00:29 RE: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin

Andi Kleen

2005-04-01 16:05 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-12 16:34 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-13 18:22 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]

Andreas Jaeger

2005-04-10 06:35 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-23 07:07 Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu
2005-04-24 15:58 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu
2005-04-24 17:36 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu

Andreas Krebbel

2005-04-15 16:04 inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-18 17:28 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-19 13:06 target_shift_truncation_mask for all shifts?!
2005-04-27 07:58 Protoize does not build with gcc 4.x

Andreas Schwab

2005-04-03 11:20 Re: Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR
2005-04-09 14:04 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-09 23:13 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-11 12:12 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-18 21:51 Re: Novell thinks you are spam
2005-04-28 13:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 15:21 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-30 13:46 Re: PPC 64bit library status?

Andreas Tobler

2005-04-05 04:38 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-19 15:22 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available

Andrew Haley

2005-04-01 11:43 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-01 13:36 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-04 15:08 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-04 16:26 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-04 16:33 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-04 17:01 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-06 12:36 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-06 12:57 HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized
2005-04-07 17:59 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE whenoptimized
2005-04-08 14:52 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized
2005-04-11 09:31 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 10:18 Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 10:32 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 11:46 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 12:01 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 12:20 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 12:50 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 13:40 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 13:32 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 13:47 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 09:24 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 12:21 Re: exceptions with longjmp (perhaps i am too stupid)
2005-04-13 13:00 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 13:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 13:51 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 22:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 14:31 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-15 17:15 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-18 10:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-19 13:25 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 16:03 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 17:06 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 18:30 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-22 10:28 Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]
2005-04-22 10:52 Re: Java field offsets [was; GCC 4.0 RC2 Available]
2005-04-27 09:47 Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]
2005-04-27 10:38 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 11:30 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 11:34 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-28 09:30 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 13:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:36 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:59 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 09:44 Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?)
2005-04-29 09:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 14:19 Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?)
2005-04-29 17:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 19:18 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-30 09:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-30 09:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Andrew MacLeod

2005-04-08 17:27 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:31 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:35 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:42 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-25 15:08 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 15:47 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 16:38 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 19:05 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 22:36 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 23:19 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-26 01:18 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-27 12:48 Re: folding after TER notes

Andrew Pinski

2005-04-02 06:10 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 21:58 Re: Bug#300945: romeo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
2005-04-02 22:03 Re: Bug#300945: romeo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
2005-04-02 23:10 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-04 18:33 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-04 19:13 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-05 00:14 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 00:14 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 04:45 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-07 15:48 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 18:58 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized
2005-04-07 22:32 Re: Does anyone use -fprofile-use with C++?
2005-04-08 17:28 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-11 17:14 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 19:57 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-12 08:11 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2005-04-12 08:18 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time
2005-04-12 14:32 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 20:44 Re: New optimisation idea ?
2005-04-13 09:50 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 14:08 Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions
2005-04-13 19:21 Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions
2005-04-13 21:17 Re: Tree-ssa dead store elimination
2005-04-14 16:42 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410
2005-04-14 16:42 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410
2005-04-14 19:00 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-14 23:06 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from
2005-04-15 05:23 Re: "make bootstrap" for cross builds
2005-04-15 18:14 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-18 02:43 Re: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1
2005-04-18 18:36 Re: Can I comment out a GTY variable?
2005-04-19 01:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-20 18:25 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?
2005-04-22 03:57 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9
2005-04-22 04:33 Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed
2005-04-22 11:10 Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]
2005-04-23 14:17 Re: A bug in the current released GCC 4.0.0
2005-04-23 23:47 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-26 00:45 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)
2005-04-26 05:02 Re: Regression involving COMMON(?)
2005-04-27 13:50 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler error in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()
2005-04-27 14:18 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler error in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()
2005-04-27 20:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 21:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 19:11 Re: std::string support UTF8?
2005-04-29 19:44 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits
2005-04-29 21:40 Re: libjava/3.4.4 problem (was Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29))
2005-04-30 15:11 Re: PPC 64bit library status?

Andrey Ivanov

2005-04-29 07:09 Tru64 5.1B gcc 4.0.0 build

Anuradha Suraparaju

2005-04-27 16:46 Dirac, GCC-4.0.0 and SIMD optimisations on x86 architecture

aram bharathi

2005-04-01 17:09 Re: gcc and vfp instructions

arcjai

2005-04-12 10:49 Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-12 10:54 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-13 07:44 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-15 08:51 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e

Arnaud Charlet

2005-04-08 06:56 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-28 08:10 Re: Ada test suite
2005-04-28 10:20 Re: Ada test suite

Ben Elliston

2005-04-04 14:01 "personal" branch?

Benjamin Kosnik

2005-04-27 16:33 Re: libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the-fvisibity-inlines

Bernardo Innocenti

2005-04-13 06:28 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-13 06:52 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-13 07:07 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-13 07:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-13 08:10 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-14 07:37 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e

Bernd Jendrissek

2005-04-26 13:33 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)

Bernd Schmidt

2005-04-07 11:34 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch
2005-04-08 08:43 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch
2005-04-11 11:43 Re: reload-branch created
2005-04-11 12:44 Re: reload-branch created
2005-04-12 08:42 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

Bill Northcott

2005-04-30 12:28 PPC 64bit library status?

Bingguang Peng

2005-04-22 12:41 i want to join

Bojan Antonovic

2005-04-28 18:31 successful build of GCC 4.0.0 on Mac OS 10.3.9 (bootstrap, Fortran95)

Brooks Moses

2005-04-18 02:44 Re: Processor-specific code

Bruce Lilly

2005-04-22 18:35 gcc 4.0 build status
2005-04-26 00:15 gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)
2005-04-26 14:46 New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-26 17:50 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)
2005-04-26 20:03 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious

Bryan Richter

2005-04-22 01:07 c54x port
2005-04-22 18:15 Re: c54x port
2005-04-24 00:57 Re: c54x port

Bryce McKinlay

2005-04-12 21:52 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available

Canqun Yang

2005-04-05 07:10 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
2005-04-05 09:31 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
2005-04-07 09:22 Inline round for IA64
2005-04-08 09:39 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-22 02:27 Re: SMS in gcc4.0

Caroline Tice

2005-04-12 06:09 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC
2005-04-12 15:54 Re: Mainline has been broken for more than 3 days now
2005-04-18 16:48 Re: hot/cold vs glibc

Charles J Gillan

2005-04-08 10:00 PowerPC sections ?

Chris Kirby

2005-04-13 14:06 -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions
2005-04-13 16:18 Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions
2005-04-15 19:05 rtx/tree calling function syntax

Chris Miller

2005-04-13 18:02 FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1
2005-04-13 18:09 FW: [gnu.org #232014] GNU Mailing Lists Question #1
2005-04-13 18:09 FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #2

Christian Ehrlicher

2005-04-28 17:00 Successful gcc4.0.0 build (MinGW i386 on WinXP)

Christian Joensson

2005-04-05 11:28 sparc.c:509:1: error: "TARGET_ASM_FILE_END" redefined...
2005-04-05 17:02 Re: sparc.c:509:1: error: "TARGET_ASM_FILE_END" redefined...
2005-04-07 16:31 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-09 12:41 Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-17 06:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze

Christian Parpart

2005-04-09 14:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-09 14:53 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze

Christophe Jaillet

2005-04-12 20:40 New optimisation idea ?

Christophe Saout

2005-04-05 16:34 [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-06 12:06 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy

Christopher Jefferson

2005-04-15 18:52 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-15 20:52 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble

Clemens Koller

2005-04-06 16:04 gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro
2005-04-07 12:35 Re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro
2005-04-11 12:00 Re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro(worksforme)
2005-04-15 10:25 ppc32/e500/no float - undefined references in libstdc++ _Unwind_*
2005-04-27 13:47 [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler errorin libm-test.c:ctanh_test()
2005-04-27 13:55 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()
2005-04-27 14:14 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()
2005-04-27 14:40 Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()

Clifford Wolf

2005-04-12 14:17 proposal: explicit context pointers in addition to trampolines in C frontend

Dale Johannesen

2005-04-01 00:51 RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 20:36 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-04 17:47 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-04 21:36 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-04 22:36 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-07 19:21 Re: ERROR : pls help
2005-04-08 23:50 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-14 17:02 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410
2005-04-15 17:02 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-24 17:00 Re: how small can gcc get?

Dan Kegel

2005-04-14 06:02 re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410
2005-04-15 14:39 re: some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3
2005-04-18 02:23 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes
2005-04-19 05:09 Re: Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0...
2005-04-20 04:45 Re: Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues
2005-04-28 21:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 16:08 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Dan Nicolaescu

2005-04-18 20:36 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-27 06:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 00:37 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Daniel Berlin

2005-04-01 13:16 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-03 22:35 Comparing free'd labels
2005-04-05 01:52 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-05 15:16 wiki changed to require fake logins
2005-04-08 17:02 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-08 17:04 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:39 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 18:14 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 18:16 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 23:36 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-08 23:57 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-12 23:48 Re: RFC:Updated VEC API
2005-04-18 16:29 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 21:38 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-19 16:04 Re: GCC superblock and region formation support
2005-04-19 17:00 Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value
2005-04-20 00:09 Re: Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues
2005-04-27 23:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 23:59 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 00:16 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 17:53 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?
2005-04-28 17:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 18:16 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 21:20 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 21:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Daniel Jacobowitz

2005-04-01 17:24 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 16:51 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-05 04:25 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices
2005-04-05 04:26 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices
2005-04-05 20:26 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-08 13:20 Re: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-08 17:42 Re: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-08 22:49 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-09 14:51 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)
2005-04-10 14:15 Re: libiberty configure mysteries
2005-04-10 15:07 Re: libiberty configure mysteries
2005-04-11 17:04 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 18:34 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-13 16:07 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-14 12:05 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-17 14:26 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 03:02 Re: empty switch substituion doesn't erase matching switch?
2005-04-18 15:35 hot/cold vs glibc
2005-04-18 17:04 Re: hot/cold vs glibc
2005-04-19 13:33 Re: CPP inconsistency
2005-04-19 16:33 Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value
2005-04-20 20:25 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-21 03:21 Re: Call into a function?
2005-04-25 15:01 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-25 15:06 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-27 01:45 Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types
2005-04-27 02:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 16:34 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 13:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 14:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Daniel Kegel

2005-04-06 23:05 re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro
2005-04-07 22:02 Does anyone use -fprofile-use with C++?
2005-04-11 17:02 RE: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 18:04 re: GCC Cross Compilation
2005-04-11 18:16 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 16:59 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 18:42 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-17 16:01 re: Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS...
2005-04-27 23:48 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Daniel Towner

2005-04-19 15:16 static inline functions disappear - incorrect static initialiseranalysis?

Dave Korn

2005-04-05 18:41 RE: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-06 09:28 RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 -> SparcSolaris 10 (& others)...
2005-04-06 11:06 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-06 11:13 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-06 11:53 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-06 11:56 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-06 15:46 RE: Trying to build crosscompiler for Sparc Solaris 8 ->SparcSolaris 10 (& others)...
2005-04-12 13:12 RE: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-12 14:21 RE: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-12 15:22 RE: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-12 15:30 Packaging error in 4.0RC1 docs? [was RE: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 ]
2005-04-12 17:19 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-12 17:24 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-12 17:45 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-12 19:32 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-13 10:19 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-14 09:12 RE: 2 suggestions
2005-04-14 09:12 RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-14 09:13 RE: 2 suggestions
2005-04-14 13:38 RE: install
2005-04-15 10:55 [PATCH] RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-15 16:28 RE: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 16:49 RE: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 17:20 RE: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 17:21 RE: Processor-specific code
2005-04-22 09:59 RE: Help installing & using GCC
2005-04-22 13:31 RE: i want to join
2005-04-26 12:13 RE: Free-Standing Implementation
2005-04-26 13:42 RE: EABI stack alignment for ppc
2005-04-27 14:44 RE: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 15:00 RE: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 15:56 RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 10:03 RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

David Carlton

2005-04-28 17:43 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

David Daney

2005-04-30 00:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

David Edelsohn

2005-04-04 22:28 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-06 16:33 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF
2005-04-06 19:12 Re: use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types
2005-04-07 14:51 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-07 15:54 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-11 20:05 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-12 13:58 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-12 15:15 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-14 15:15 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-19 01:25 Re: sync operations: where's the barrier?
2005-04-26 13:49 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler
2005-04-27 14:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 15:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 16:19 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:09 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:53 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 18:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

David Gressett

2005-04-27 18:25 GCC 4.0.0 build report on Fedora Core 3

Denis Vlasenko

2005-04-02 12:19 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel
2005-04-02 12:27 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel
2005-04-06 10:15 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-06 16:12 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-20 06:21 Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2
2005-04-21 06:11 Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2

Devang Patel

2005-04-04 16:49 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-04 16:59 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
2005-04-07 19:52 Re: ERROR : pls help
2005-04-08 16:55 Re: benchmarks
2005-04-08 17:26 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-12 15:59 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-12 16:05 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-15 04:52 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-17 17:03 [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2005-04-18 16:55 line-map question
2005-04-18 19:26 Re: line-map question
2005-04-19 02:43 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2005-04-19 15:02 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2005-04-19 19:09 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2005-04-27 02:29 Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types
2005-04-28 17:23 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 18:08 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Diego Novillo

2005-04-01 19:36 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-05 00:06 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-06 13:02 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE when optimized
2005-04-08 00:34 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-08 01:06 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-08 16:45 Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-08 17:56 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:58 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 18:15 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 22:33 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-09 01:54 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-09 14:42 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-10 03:23 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-12 02:09 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2005-04-12 12:16 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2005-04-12 13:05 Mainline has been broken for more than 3 days now
2005-04-14 13:34 libstdc++ link failures on ppc64
2005-04-14 13:40 ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so
2005-04-14 13:41 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64
2005-04-14 16:47 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64
2005-04-14 17:25 Re: ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so
2005-04-14 19:30 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64
2005-04-14 20:04 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 20:29 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 20:33 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64
2005-04-15 03:11 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 18:19 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-23 13:29 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu
2005-04-24 16:55 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu
2005-04-24 21:27 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu
2005-04-25 14:53 tree-cleanup-branch is now closed
2005-04-27 20:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 16:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 18:43 Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu

Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos

2005-04-27 15:15 building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris
2005-04-29 12:02 i?86-*-sco3.2v5* / i?86-*-solaris2.10 / x86_64-*-*, amd64-*-*

Dimitry Golubovsky

2005-04-12 14:10 gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-12 16:36 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-12 17:18 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin

Don Lindsay

2005-04-23 01:18 gcc-4.0.0 build problem on solaris

Douglas Charles

2005-04-15 04:50 Objective-C++ Status

Duncan Sands

2005-04-15 07:21 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++

E. Weddington

2005-04-01 21:24 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 21:59 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 22:40 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 23:12 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-06 13:48 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-07 16:45 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host
2005-04-07 17:40 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-08 21:11 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host
2005-04-13 15:56 Re: GCC Cross Compilation
2005-04-14 22:09 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-15 15:27 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 16:10 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 16:28 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 16:35 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 16:39 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 17:11 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 17:23 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 21:20 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-27 21:40 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin
2005-04-28 14:01 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin

Eli Ben-Shoshan

2005-04-28 16:21 gcc 4.0.0 build status on AIX 5.2
2005-04-28 16:24 gcc 4.0.0 test status on AIX 5.2

Eric Botcazou

2005-04-05 14:47 Re: sparc.c:509:1: error: "TARGET_ASM_FILE_END" redefined...
2005-04-06 18:13 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-06 21:58 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-07 10:05 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-07 10:45 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-07 13:53 apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-07 14:52 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-07 14:56 Re: Status of conversions to predicates.md
2005-04-07 16:18 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 17:00 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-08 00:02 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-08 09:21 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-09 09:58 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)
2005-04-09 10:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)
2005-04-09 19:47 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)
2005-04-10 22:53 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 06:16 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 09:00 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 19:43 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 21:30 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 06:02 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 06:07 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-17 15:31 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Status
2005-04-18 13:45 Re: libraries - double set
2005-04-19 06:16 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 06:53 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-19 19:27 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 19:39 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-19 21:37 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-20 15:21 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-20 16:52 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-22 19:53 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9
2005-04-30 19:14 Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris
2005-04-30 19:24 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support

Eric Christopher

2005-04-05 21:45 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices
2005-04-06 06:25 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices
2005-04-07 18:46 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-08 02:31 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-10 19:16 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-10 19:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-19 04:18 Re: Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0...
2005-04-19 04:23 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type
2005-04-27 06:56 Re: [RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewerpatterns with more embedded code?

Eric Lemings

2005-04-22 04:19 gcc-4.0.0 build failed
2005-04-22 04:25 Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed

Etienne Lorrain

2005-04-19 13:28 CPP inconsistency
2005-04-25 09:57 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces

feng qiu

2005-04-05 06:46 Question about "#pragma pack(n)"
2005-04-06 04:20 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)"

Florian Weimer

2005-04-24 19:43 Re: how small can gcc get?
2005-04-28 07:45 Ada test suite
2005-04-28 10:08 Re: Ada test suite

Frank Ch. Eigler

2005-04-08 17:33 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

FX Coudert

2005-04-17 19:57 Re: Processor-specific code

Gabriel Dos Reis

2005-04-01 20:22 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 22:55 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-02 09:00 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 22:35 Re: Bug#300945: romeo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment
2005-04-03 19:06 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-07 19:51 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-08 01:48 Re: Does anyone use -fprofile-use with C++?
2005-04-10 14:09 libiberty configure mysteries
2005-04-10 14:59 Re: libiberty configure mysteries
2005-04-10 19:03 Re: libiberty configure mysteries
2005-04-11 11:35 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 12:07 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 01:33 Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2005-04-12 04:00 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2005-04-12 04:37 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2005-04-12 08:55 Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu
2005-04-14 14:28 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 20:08 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 20:26 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 07:04 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 07:09 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 07:50 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 17:05 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-16 00:22 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-16 01:12 Re: Template and dynamic dispatching
2005-04-20 15:12 Re: GCC 3.3 status
2005-04-23 17:55 Re: tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend
2005-04-26 15:59 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-27 12:07 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 12:09 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 12:14 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 12:18 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 12:28 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 12:32 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 14:16 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 14:18 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 14:18 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 15:27 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 16:34 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-30 02:59 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)
2005-04-30 17:31 GCC-3.3.6 release status
2005-04-30 21:28 GCC-3.3.6 prerelease for testing

Gang-Ryung Uh

2005-04-23 18:09 Stack frame question on x86 code generation

Gareth Elston

2005-04-19 14:59 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available

Gareth Pearce

2005-04-18 02:37 function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1
2005-04-18 02:56 RE: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1

Gary Funck

2005-04-18 02:49 empty switch substituion doesn't erase matching switch?
2005-04-25 01:30 tips on debugging a GCC 3.4.3 MIPS RTL optim problem?
2005-04-26 17:55 RE: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)
2005-04-26 23:30 RE: Ada and bad configury architecture.
2005-04-27 05:50 RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

gccadmin

2005-04-02 00:07 gcc-3.4-20050401 is now available
2005-04-03 00:20 gcc-4.0-20050402 is now available
2005-04-03 18:10 gcc-4.1-20050403 is now available
2005-04-07 00:49 gcc-3.3-20050406 is now available
2005-04-09 00:14 gcc-3.4-20050408 is now available
2005-04-09 23:43 gcc-4.0-20050409 is now available
2005-04-10 18:09 gcc-4.1-20050410 is now available
2005-04-13 23:58 gcc-3.3-20050413 is now available
2005-04-15 23:56 gcc-3.4-20050415 is now available
2005-04-16 23:52 gcc-4.0-20050416 is now available
2005-04-17 18:11 gcc-4.1-20050417 is now available
2005-04-20 23:43 gcc-3.3-20050420 is now available
2005-04-23 00:02 gcc-3.4-20050422 is now available
2005-04-23 23:45 gcc-4.0-20050423 is now available
2005-04-24 18:20 gcc-4.1-20050424 is now available
2005-04-27 23:49 gcc-3.3-20050427 is now available
2005-04-30 00:17 gcc-3.4-20050429 is now available
2005-04-30 23:50 gcc-4.0-20050430 is now available

Geert Bosch

2005-04-04 00:31 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-07 12:08 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-07 17:11 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-07 17:41 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-07 19:34 Re: Inline round for IA64

Geoff Keating

2005-04-12 13:39 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 13:54 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 13:54 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-20 02:36 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available

Geoffrey Keating

2005-04-04 21:48 call for testers!
2005-04-04 22:45 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-05 00:22 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-12 02:55 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-18 05:44 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-18 05:44 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-18 05:44 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-18 05:44 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-18 21:47 sync operations: where's the barrier?
2005-04-18 23:26 Re: Can I comment out a GTY variable?
2005-04-19 01:07 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 02:41 Re: sync operations: where's the barrier?
2005-04-26 23:08 Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc
2005-04-26 23:08 Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c)

Georg Bauhaus

2005-04-01 22:32 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-02 01:30 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-02 03:21 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-04 00:03 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-11 13:22 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 11:23 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 01:05 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-14 20:25 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-14 20:27 Re: 2 suggestions

Georg Steffers

2005-04-13 12:07 exceptions with longjmp (perhaps i am too stupid)

Gerald Pfeifer

2005-04-02 18:29 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-03 20:33 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
2005-04-03 21:07 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
2005-04-03 21:08 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
2005-04-04 14:07 Re: "personal" branch?
2005-04-05 20:40 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2*
2005-04-10 20:48 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2*
2005-04-13 23:24 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-14 12:45 Re: install
2005-04-14 14:59 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-14 19:35 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 21:42 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-14 21:56 Joseph appointed i18n maintainer
2005-04-16 11:10 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-17 18:00 Re: Vectorizing my loops. Some problems.
2005-04-20 10:12 Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html
2005-04-20 10:12 Re: Packaging error in 4.0RC1 docs? [was RE: Problem compiling GCC4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 ]
2005-04-20 10:56 makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..}
2005-04-20 10:57 Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html
2005-04-24 19:39 [wwwdocs] PATCH for GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes
2005-04-24 20:41 RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

Giovanni Bajo

2005-04-01 07:51 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux
2005-04-04 16:26 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-04 16:48 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-05 00:09 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 13:28 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-09 01:06 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-12 10:25 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-17 09:25 Re: Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS...
2005-04-20 10:12 GCC 3.3 status
2005-04-26 00:01 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
2005-04-30 19:15 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-30 19:18 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-30 19:22 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-30 19:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Graham Stott

2005-04-12 20:24 Re: ada build failure?

Greg McGary

2005-04-21 00:56 emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves
2005-04-22 20:45 Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves

Greg Schafer

2005-04-12 02:03 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available

Grzegorz B. Prokopski

2005-04-01 05:11 Problems using cfg_layout_finalize()
2005-04-02 00:20 Re: Problems using cfg_layout_finalize()

Gunther Nikl

2005-04-28 15:01 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 15:44 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Guochun Shi

2005-04-16 20:33 compile error for gcc-4.0.0-20050410

guozy03

2005-04-07 16:34 How to specify customized base addr?

H. J. Lu

2005-04-05 23:12 Use normal section names for comdat group?
2005-04-08 16:57 Re: Use normal section names for comdat group?
2005-04-08 22:26 Re: Use normal section names for comdat group?
2005-04-10 17:43 The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released
2005-04-10 22:30 Re: The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released
2005-04-14 16:54 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64
2005-04-14 20:29 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64
2005-04-18 18:11 Can I comment out a GTY variable?
2005-04-24 02:08 Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?
2005-04-24 16:21 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?
2005-04-25 20:32 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?
2005-04-25 22:28 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?
2005-04-30 00:05 The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.2 is released
2005-04-30 19:37 PATCH: Speed up AR for ELF
2005-04-30 19:40 PATCH: Speed up ELF section merge
2005-04-30 19:50 Slow _bfd_strip_section_from_output

Hans-Peter Nilsson

2005-04-23 23:29 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-23 23:40 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-24 22:52 CC_REG: "Ian's cc0 replacement machinery", request for stage 2 conceptual approval

Harry Goulding

2005-04-06 12:00 Input and print statements for Front End?

Henrik Sorensen

2005-04-18 14:15 front-end tools for preprocessor / macro expansion

Hugh Sasse

2005-04-28 18:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 23:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng

2005-04-06 15:36 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-06 21:24 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-07 09:40 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-07 10:30 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-07 11:14 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-07 17:33 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 20:54 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-12 11:40 Re: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-12 12:20 Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.
2005-04-12 14:00 RE: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-12 14:40 RE: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-14 15:58 Re: 2 suggestions

Ian Lance Taylor

2005-04-10 16:05 Re: libiberty configure mysteries
2005-04-13 03:19 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-13 03:41 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 13:27 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-15 03:30 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-15 14:44 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-15 17:29 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-15 18:17 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-16 15:29 Re: Doubt : Help
2005-04-17 01:28 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-20 16:26 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?
2005-04-23 16:07 tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend
2005-04-24 04:22 Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c)
2005-04-24 04:51 Re: spill_failure
2005-04-27 06:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 18:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 14:59 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 15:36 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 16:08 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 17:30 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 21:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-30 00:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Jack Howarth

2005-04-17 03:39 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze

Jakub Jelinek

2005-04-08 16:59 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:25 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-11 05:09 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 17:04 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 09:52 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-14 06:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-19 14:20 Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility
2005-04-29 10:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

James A. Morrison

2005-04-04 20:43 Re: specification for gcc compilers on sparc and powerpc
2005-04-15 13:22 Re: Objective-C++ Status
2005-04-17 05:07 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-17 05:17 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers

James E Wilson

2005-04-01 00:11 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch
2005-04-01 02:37 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch
2005-04-01 19:53 Re: PR 20505
2005-04-02 03:17 Re: GNU toolchain for blackfin processor
2005-04-02 03:20 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux
2005-04-05 00:17 Re: Problems using cfg_layout_finalize()
2005-04-06 00:46 Re: 4.0-20050319 / 4-020050402 build error due to --enable-mappedlocation
2005-04-06 01:19 Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement
2005-04-06 01:37 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)"
2005-04-06 20:37 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)"
2005-04-07 22:08 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-07 22:12 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch
2005-04-07 22:36 Re: Use normal section names for comdat group?
2005-04-07 22:38 Re: about alias analysis
2005-04-08 00:57 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-11 23:48 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-12 21:27 Re: PowerPC sections ?
2005-04-13 00:07 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE whenoptimized
2005-04-13 00:31 Re: RTL code
2005-04-13 19:28 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-13 20:55 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-13 21:47 Re: FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1
2005-04-14 22:02 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-16 00:02 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-18 22:30 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-19 00:20 Re: Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS
2005-04-19 00:35 Re: ppc32/e500/no float - undefined references in libstdc++ _Unwind_*
2005-04-19 00:43 Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment
2005-04-19 00:47 Re: compile error for gcc-4.0.0-20050410
2005-04-19 01:07 Re: The subreg question
2005-04-19 01:29 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type
2005-04-19 03:35 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-19 07:29 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 18:40 Re: The subreg question
2005-04-19 18:51 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type
2005-04-19 21:49 Re: i386 stack slot optimisation
2005-04-19 23:20 Re: i386 stack slot optimisation
2005-04-21 01:42 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-21 02:21 Re: static inline functions disappear - incorrect static initialiser analysis?
2005-04-21 02:50 Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes
2005-04-21 03:11 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions
2005-04-21 03:16 Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2
2005-04-21 03:32 Re: Call into a function?
2005-04-21 19:06 Re: 转发: Call into a function?
2005-04-22 06:28 Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves
2005-04-22 06:45 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-22 06:58 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions
2005-04-22 07:10 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-22 07:49 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9
2005-04-22 18:08 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-22 20:04 Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418
2005-04-23 00:01 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-25 20:22 Re: The subreg question
2005-04-25 20:28 Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418
2005-04-25 23:18 Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions
2005-04-25 23:23 Re: gcc-4.0.0 build problem on solaris
2005-04-26 00:02 Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves
2005-04-26 00:26 Re: Stack frame question on x86 code generation
2005-04-26 00:32 Re: spill_failure
2005-04-26 00:40 Re: benchmark call malloc a lot?
2005-04-26 00:43 Re: about how to write makefile.in config-lang.in for a frontend
2005-04-26 00:48 Re: c54x port
2005-04-26 01:15 Re: tips on debugging a GCC 3.4.3 MIPS RTL optim problem?
2005-04-26 02:32 Re: gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning
2005-04-26 02:37 Re: object code execution statistics
2005-04-26 04:16 Re: Fixing of bug 18877
2005-04-26 18:02 Re: Re[2]: object code execution statistics
2005-04-26 21:43 Re: Where did the include files go?
2005-04-26 22:02 Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces)
2005-04-27 00:41 Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]
2005-04-27 00:55 Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types
2005-04-27 01:38 Re: Submission Status: CRX port ?
2005-04-27 03:40 Re: Build gcc-4.0.0
2005-04-27 20:51 Re: Build gcc-4.0.0
2005-04-27 21:04 Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]
2005-04-27 23:53 Re: [RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewer patterns with more embedded code?
2005-04-28 01:48 Re: GCC 4.0.0 build report on Fedora Core 3
2005-04-28 02:18 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin
2005-04-28 02:28 Re: about madd instruction in mips instruction sets
2005-04-29 00:50 Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin

James Tabor

2005-04-14 21:06 Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS
2005-04-17 09:11 Re: Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS

Jan Hubicka

2005-04-01 21:43 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel
2005-04-09 12:03 Re: Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block?

Jan Okrasinski

2005-04-23 13:03 gcc 4.0.0 successful build

Janis Johnson

2005-04-07 23:07 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-15 17:23 Re: "make bootstrap" for cross builds
2005-04-25 18:07 Re: Build of GCC 4.0.0 successful
2005-04-28 17:39 Re: Ada test suite

Jason Merrill

2005-04-05 05:48 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-13 09:39 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-14 12:24 Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 15:40 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 16:56 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 21:30 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 21:33 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 07:54 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-17 14:20 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-21 20:31 Re: Java field offsets

Jason Thorpe

2005-04-29 04:44 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 05:05 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Jean-Paul Rigault

2005-04-23 08:09 Build gcc-4.0.0

Jeff Clifford

2005-04-25 11:38 Successful gcc4.0.0 build (Redhat 9. Kernel 2.4.25)

Jeffrey A Law

2005-04-08 16:52 Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:09 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:10 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:46 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 18:04 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 18:05 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 20:17 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-11 19:25 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 16:36 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-13 05:00 Re: About the number of DOM's iterations.
2005-04-15 16:19 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-19 06:02 Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-19 16:09 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-19 20:05 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-20 15:33 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-20 17:23 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-27 06:36 folding after TER notes
2005-04-27 08:23 Re: folding after TER notes
2005-04-27 16:24 Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous
2005-04-27 16:52 Re: folding after TER notes
2005-04-27 17:16 Re: folding after TER notes

Jeroen Scheerder

2005-04-23 16:33 Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-23 19:00 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-24 06:58 One fully and one partially successful build
2005-04-25 10:35 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-25 15:05 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-25 15:08 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support

Jerome Guitton

2005-04-19 16:29 register name for DW_AT_frame_base value
2005-04-19 16:50 Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value

jgrant

2005-04-05 13:15 Biagio Lucini [lucini@phys.ethz.ch] bouncing

Joe Buck

2005-04-01 18:33 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 23:03 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-02 06:23 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 19:04 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-03 00:04 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-04 16:21 Re: 4.0 regression: g++ class layout on PPC32 has changed
2005-04-04 16:25 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-04 16:29 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-04 22:36 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-04 23:32 HPUX/HPPA build broken (was Re: call for testers!)
2005-04-05 00:22 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-05 23:05 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-06 17:41 Re: Illegal promotion of bool to int....
2005-04-07 18:49 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 19:23 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-08 00:28 Re: Does anyone use -fprofile-use with C++?
2005-04-08 17:11 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 17:14 Re: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-08 17:34 Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
2005-04-08 23:58 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-11 16:57 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-15 19:24 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-17 04:31 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes
2005-04-18 21:08 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 00:13 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 00:36 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 15:54 Re: CPP inconsistency
2005-04-19 15:58 Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility
2005-04-19 16:13 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 16:24 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 19:04 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 20:33 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-21 03:59 Mike Stump named as Objective-C/Objective-C++ maintainer
2005-04-22 16:40 Re: gpg signatures on tar/diff
2005-04-22 16:45 Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed
2005-04-22 16:57 Re: c54x port
2005-04-22 22:09 Build and test results for GCC 4.0.0
2005-04-22 23:56 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9
2005-04-25 01:03 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-26 16:32 Re: object code execution statistics
2005-04-27 16:44 Re: Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent
2005-04-27 17:47 Re: Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent
2005-04-27 23:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 03:53 Mike Stump added as Darwin maintainer
2005-04-28 16:46 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 16:56 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?
2005-04-28 17:53 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?
2005-04-28 18:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 16:47 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 18:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 20:52 Re: C54x port: some general technical questions
2005-04-29 20:54 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits
2005-04-29 22:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-30 01:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp dot com>

2005-04-06 11:38 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-06 13:42 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-12 11:17 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 11:26 Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
2005-04-12 19:32 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-28 15:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Joern RENNECKE

2005-04-19 19:58 RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes
2005-04-25 13:42 Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes
2005-04-28 14:20 Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes
2005-04-28 17:26 Another ms-bitfield question...

John David Anglin

2005-04-04 23:31 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-04 23:39 Re: HPUX/HPPA build broken (was Re: call for testers!)
2005-04-05 00:38 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-05 22:59 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-12 10:33 Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC
2005-04-14 22:28 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-21 13:36 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-22 00:15 Re: Help Required on HP-UX 11.0 & 11.11

John Sullivan via RT

2005-04-21 18:58 Re: [gnu.org #232052] FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1
2005-04-21 18:59 Re: [gnu.org #232057] FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #2

Jon Beniston

2005-04-25 09:55 Register allocation in GCC 4
2005-04-25 12:39 RE: Register allocation in GCC 4
2005-04-25 19:34 Store scheduling with DFA scheduler
2005-04-25 19:37 Side-effect latency in DFA scheduler
2005-04-26 11:52 RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler
2005-04-26 14:16 RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler

Jon Grimm

2005-04-14 16:15 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64

Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault

2005-04-29 20:11 C54x port: some general technical questions

Jonathan Larmour

2005-04-18 19:45 MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0
2005-04-19 10:56 Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0

Jonathan Wakely

2005-04-04 10:50 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 11:05 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 11:08 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 12:03 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 12:07 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-13 08:59 Re: Help me about C language Specification
2005-04-16 14:56 Re: implicit type cast problem of reference of ponter to const type
2005-04-27 15:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Joseph S. Myers

2005-04-06 10:52 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-13 00:33 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 17:20 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 20:32 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 16:57 RE: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-18 11:09 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-19 16:20 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 18:51 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-23 16:48 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-25 15:22 Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces)
2005-04-25 17:09 Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces)
2005-04-26 15:10 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-28 16:26 Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0].
2005-04-29 10:48 Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0].
2005-04-29 21:37 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)

Josh Conner

2005-04-07 16:46 ARM EABI Exception Handling
2005-04-20 00:18 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available

Julian Brown

2005-04-11 23:10 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 23:38 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-18 22:18 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available

Kai Henningsen

2005-04-03 21:20 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-03 21:20 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-03 21:20 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?

Kai Ruottu

2005-04-15 10:14 Re: some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3

Karel Gardas

2005-04-12 10:33 OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compilinglarge C/C++ sources
2005-04-12 13:38 Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compilinglarge C/C++ sources
2005-04-12 19:59 gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency important onAMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources]
2005-04-27 20:54 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 08:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Karl Berry

2005-04-06 13:03 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2*
2005-04-20 13:01 Re: makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..}

Kate Minola

2005-04-11 19:01 Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-12 13:52 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-12 15:14 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-14 14:57 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-14 15:34 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-21 13:38 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0

Kaveh R. Ghazi

2005-04-02 03:12 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 14:22 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-07 16:37 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 18:52 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 19:11 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-11 18:49 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 00:11 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-14 17:12 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-19 02:07 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-20 02:47 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-20 03:08 Re: 2 suggestions

Kazu Hirata

2005-04-05 15:37 Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-07 14:42 Status of conversions to predicates.md
2005-04-12 05:13 Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC
2005-04-12 18:37 About the number of DOM's iterations.
2005-04-21 14:21 What's the fate of VARRAY_*?
2005-04-22 14:27 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c
2005-04-24 19:45 Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 15:33 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 16:02 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 16:20 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 18:38 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 19:38 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 21:56 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 23:02 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-26 00:35 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-26 02:38 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-30 00:10 Re: Struggle with FOR_EACH_EDGE

Kelley Cook

2005-04-05 14:22 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 15:47 Re: call for testers!
2005-04-20 18:22 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?
2005-04-21 13:53 Re: RFA: .opt files for x86, darwin and lynxos

Kelly Murphy

2005-04-01 18:16 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level

Ken Raeburn

2005-04-18 22:08 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-19 18:28 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++

Kenneth Zadeck

2005-04-09 13:19 Re: Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block?

Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

2005-04-30 12:55 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits

Kumar Gala

2005-04-06 18:59 use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types
2005-04-06 19:21 Re: use of extended asm on ppc for long long data types

Kumar, Vijay

2005-04-21 14:14 Help Required on HP-UX 11.0 & 11.11

Larry Evans

2005-04-01 15:02 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-01 16:10 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 16:39 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-16 15:19 Re: Template and dynamic dispatching
2005-04-16 15:51 Re: Template and dynamic dispatching

Lars Segerlund

2005-04-28 14:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 10:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf

2005-04-11 22:42 successful bootstrap/install of GCC 4.0 RC1 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86
2005-04-22 14:32 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9

Laurent GUERBY

2005-04-09 09:49 GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)
2005-04-09 10:18 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)
2005-04-09 15:19 [Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handle junkstrings
2005-04-09 18:51 Re: [Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handlejunk strings
2005-04-09 19:46 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)
2005-04-09 22:48 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-09 23:07 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-10 09:36 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-12 10:35 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 10:42 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 20:46 Re: ada build failure?
2005-04-14 22:06 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-18 20:47 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-18 21:25 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-28 11:05 Re: Ada test suite
2005-04-28 18:55 Re: Ada test suite

Laurielle Lea

2005-04-28 19:07 std::string support UTF8?

Ling-hua Tseng

2005-04-17 09:01 The subreg question
2005-04-19 11:45 Re: The subreg question
2005-04-23 16:22 Re: The subreg question

Luca Saiu

2005-04-25 00:32 GCC 4.0.0: (mostly) successful build and installation on GNU/LinuxPowerPC

Marcin Dalecki

2005-04-02 00:56 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-02 01:06 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-04 20:05 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-05 11:26 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-08 18:13 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-10 21:27 Re: The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released
2005-04-11 13:36 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-15 03:48 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 21:52 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 21:55 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 22:20 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 23:58 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-18 07:23 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes
2005-04-18 07:27 Re: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1
2005-04-28 01:17 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 01:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 01:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 01:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 01:59 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9
2005-04-28 10:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 17:22 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Marcus Meissner

2005-04-11 19:02 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available

Marek Krzyzowski

2005-04-04 19:48 specification for gcc compilers on sparc and powerpc
2005-04-06 17:32 specs file

Mario Linke

2005-04-26 12:40 Build report for AIX 5.1

Mark Mitchell

2005-04-01 16:31 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux
2005-04-01 19:24 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 19:37 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 20:16 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 21:07 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 21:36 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-04 23:26 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 03:49 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 05:24 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 06:04 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 06:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 21:43 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-05 21:45 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-05 23:30 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-06 15:38 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-08 23:40 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-09 07:03 GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-10 19:18 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-10 22:05 GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-10 22:57 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 14:41 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 17:09 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 03:11 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 18:00 GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-13 04:23 Re: RFC:Updated VEC API
2005-04-13 04:32 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 06:02 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-14 06:02 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 15:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-14 17:22 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-14 19:05 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-14 19:20 Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64
2005-04-14 23:04 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-14 23:05 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-15 00:26 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-15 06:44 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-15 19:39 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-17 06:54 GCC 4.0 RC2 Status
2005-04-18 14:44 GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 15:31 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-19 15:44 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 15:49 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 15:56 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 15:57 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 15:58 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 16:03 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 16:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 23:13 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 23:14 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 23:17 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-22 07:13 GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes
2005-04-22 07:15 GCC 4.0.0 has been released
2005-04-22 19:44 Re: GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes
2005-04-25 01:57 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-27 17:50 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 20:55 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?
2005-04-29 19:01 GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)
2005-04-29 19:33 Re: CC_REG: "Ian's cc0 replacement machinery", request for stage2 conceptual approval
2005-04-29 20:04 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits
2005-04-29 21:39 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)

Mark Wielaard

2005-04-12 18:15 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 18:48 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 22:11 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available

Martin Koegler

2005-04-12 12:21 internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-14 11:02 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-16 13:32 Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362
2005-04-19 09:15 different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-21 09:45 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-23 17:18 Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces
2005-04-24 14:40 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces
2005-04-24 16:52 Fixing of bug 18877
2005-04-25 14:58 Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed for different address spaces)
2005-04-25 16:21 Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed for different address spaces)
2005-04-27 20:04 different address spaces
2005-04-28 17:10 Re: different address spaces
2005-04-28 20:32 Re: different address spaces

Master Faris

2005-04-14 12:35 install
2005-04-14 12:36 install

Matt Thomas

2005-04-24 00:43 [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c)
2005-04-27 02:25 [PATCH] VAX: cleanup; move macros from config/vax/vax.h to normalin config/vax/vax.c
2005-04-27 02:50 GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 05:41 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 05:45 [RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewer patternswith more embedded code?
2005-04-27 06:12 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 15:05 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 15:45 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 21:25 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 18:03 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 23:51 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Matthias Klose

2005-04-09 19:40 GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)

Matthieu Moy

2005-04-12 15:55 Pinapa: A SystemC front-end based on GCC

Melissa O'Neill

2005-04-24 22:07 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++

Michael Matz

2005-04-01 15:56 Re: about new_regalloc
2005-04-14 02:41 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410

Michael Meissner

2005-04-16 02:22 An old timer returns to the fold

Michael N. Moran

2005-04-14 14:13 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 19:26 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 19:36 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 19:41 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 11:12 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 11:35 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 17:42 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 17:55 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++

Mike Hearn

2005-04-16 22:37 C++ ABI mismatch crashes
2005-04-17 16:42 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes
2005-04-18 14:12 Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes

Mike Stump

2005-04-01 19:37 Re: i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end
2005-04-01 19:44 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-01 19:48 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-04 19:12 Re: Cross-compiling for PPC405 core...
2005-04-05 22:21 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)"
2005-04-07 20:42 Re: How to specify customized base addr?
2005-04-07 20:47 Re: How to "disable" register allocation?
2005-04-11 21:09 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 17:55 Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources
2005-04-12 18:30 Re: about the parse tree
2005-04-13 00:24 Re: gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources]
2005-04-14 01:34 Re: Help me about C language Specification
2005-04-15 18:18 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 18:28 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 18:30 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 19:08 Re: Objective-C++ Status
2005-04-15 19:19 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-15 19:21 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-15 21:37 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-15 22:00 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 22:38 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-17 18:14 Re: How to -Werror in a fortran testcase?
2005-04-18 18:54 Re: line-map question
2005-04-18 22:45 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-19 02:16 Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type
2005-04-22 19:46 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9
2005-04-22 20:08 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9
2005-04-23 13:55 Re: writeable-strings (gcc 4 and lower versions) clarification
2005-04-24 13:43 Re: how small can gcc get?
2005-04-24 19:12 Re: how small can gcc get?
2005-04-25 22:36 Re: Where did the include files go?
2005-04-26 18:32 Re: sjlj exceptions?
2005-04-27 19:53 Re: Build gcc-4.0.0
2005-04-27 20:59 Re: different address spaces
2005-04-27 21:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 21:26 Re: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin
2005-04-27 21:30 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious

Mile Davidovic

2005-04-06 14:51 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation

Mostafa Hagog

2005-04-10 08:59 Propagating loop carried memory dependancies to SMS
2005-04-11 11:31 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order offunctions and top-level asms via cgraph]

Nathan Sidwell

2005-04-01 08:38 Re: PR 20505
2005-04-01 19:56 Re: PR 20505
2005-04-04 08:33 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-04 09:30 Re: PR 20505
2005-04-04 09:54 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 10:22 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 11:08 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-11 11:18 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 11:58 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-11 12:09 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 18:43 RFC:Updated VEC API
2005-04-14 16:12 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 14:59 Re: Questions on CC
2005-04-16 19:45 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-21 14:25 Re: What's the fate of VARRAY_*?
2005-04-23 16:24 Re: tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend
2005-04-24 09:35 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?
2005-04-25 07:48 Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?
2005-04-25 11:08 Re: Register allocation in GCC 4
2005-04-25 11:12 Re: Register allocation in GCC 4
2005-04-26 10:50 Re: Side-effect latency in DFA scheduler
2005-04-26 10:57 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler
2005-04-26 11:29 Re: Regression involving COMMON(?)
2005-04-26 12:28 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler
2005-04-26 14:07 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler

Nathanael Nerode

2005-04-26 03:46 Ada and bad configury architecture.

Neil Booth

2005-04-27 12:15 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious

Nicholas Nethercote

2005-04-13 00:12 Re: gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency importanton AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources]
2005-04-18 18:54 Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC?
2005-04-18 19:19 Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC?

Nick Rasmussen

2005-04-14 01:31 unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410
2005-04-23 00:52 Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410

Nix

2005-04-04 23:29 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-05 14:12 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-20 19:16 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-21 06:36 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-21 14:18 Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0
2005-04-30 22:45 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

nkavv

2005-04-05 04:19 Using inline assembly with specific register indices
2005-04-05 04:22 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices
2005-04-05 04:31 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices
2005-04-06 01:16 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices

Olivier Hainque

2005-04-26 13:25 EABI stack alignment for ppc
2005-04-26 15:13 Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc
2005-04-29 12:01 Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc

Panagiotis Papadakos

2005-04-26 18:58 libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the -fvisibity-inlines

Paolo Bonzini

2005-04-06 15:26 Re: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy
2005-04-07 16:14 Re: Input and print statements for Front End?
2005-04-12 07:10 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-18 14:37 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-19 06:59 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-19 15:34 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available

Paolo Carlini

2005-04-26 19:06 Re: libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the -fvisibity-inlines
2005-04-29 19:39 Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits
2005-04-29 20:11 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits
2005-04-29 21:02 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits
2005-04-30 22:49 FAIL: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc
2005-04-30 23:12 Re: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc

Pat Haugen

2005-04-12 22:18 Basic block reordering algorithm
2005-04-13 18:46 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm
2005-04-13 20:52 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm
2005-04-13 21:13 Tree-ssa dead store elimination

Patrick McFarland

2005-04-20 10:39 Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html

Patrick Mitran

2005-04-23 06:30 GCC 4.0.0 fsincos?

Paul Brook

2005-04-06 12:39 Re: Input and print statements for Front End?
2005-04-07 17:04 Re: ARM EABI Exception Handling
2005-04-07 18:14 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-15 12:53 Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment
2005-04-15 17:56 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-17 10:54 Re: How to -Werror in a fortran testcase?

Paul Jarc

2005-04-13 21:49 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available

Paul Koning

2005-04-01 23:12 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-05 13:14 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)
2005-04-14 14:31 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 22:06 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 13:24 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 16:03 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 16:34 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 16:35 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 16:53 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 16:56 RE: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 17:37 RE: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 22:03 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-19 20:45 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-19 21:25 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-25 14:10 Re: how small can gcc get?
2005-04-27 20:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 20:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 21:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Paul Schlie

2005-04-02 02:03 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization level
2005-04-03 20:41 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-05 18:31 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-09 04:19 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-09 16:18 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-11 02:41 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-15 16:22 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 18:31 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-17 17:48 [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type
2005-04-19 17:34 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-19 18:03 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-20 18:14 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-20 18:33 Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
2005-04-21 16:14 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler erroratdwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-22 11:59 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-22 22:56 Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)
2005-04-23 14:16 Re: different address spaces
2005-04-23 14:56 Re: different address spaces
2005-04-23 18:27 Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces
2005-04-23 18:55 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces
2005-04-25 03:58 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces
2005-04-25 15:30 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces
2005-04-27 04:59 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
2005-04-27 05:04 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
2005-04-28 16:38 Re: different address spaces
2005-04-28 19:43 Re: different address spaces
2005-04-28 22:04 Re: different address spaces

Paul Thomas

2005-04-26 10:59 Re: Regression involving COMMON(?)

Paul Woegerer

2005-04-25 09:13 Submission Status: CRX port ?

Per Bothner

2005-04-11 21:51 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-11 22:33 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 18:23 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 21:04 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-12 23:16 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 23:28 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 01:00 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-19 21:27 Re: line-map question
2005-04-20 01:04 Java field offsets [was; GCC 4.0 RC2 Available]

Petar Penchev

2005-04-15 12:33 Stack and Function parameters alignment
2005-04-15 13:49 Re: Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment

Peter Barada

2005-04-03 15:24 Re: Sorry for the noise: Bootstrap fails on HEAD 4.1 for AVR
2005-04-14 14:21 [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-15 05:22 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-15 16:09 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-15 16:57 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-15 18:05 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-15 20:07 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-16 23:37 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-17 06:04 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-28 01:01 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 01:06 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 03:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 15:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 18:02 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 04:06 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Peter Brown via RT

2005-04-05 16:30 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Peter FELECAN

2005-04-19 12:26 libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility
2005-04-19 15:18 Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility
2005-04-19 16:09 Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility

Philip George

2005-04-24 00:05 how small can gcc get?
2005-04-24 17:30 Re: how small can gcc get?

Rainer Orth

2005-04-22 09:12 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c
2005-04-25 10:25 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-25 10:28 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-25 11:23 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-25 15:06 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support
2005-04-25 15:11 Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support

Rajkishore Barik

2005-04-02 18:20 GCC errors
2005-04-12 03:52 RTL code
2005-04-23 22:20 spill_failure
2005-04-24 00:51 Re: spill_failure

Ralf Corsepius

2005-04-15 15:07 struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 15:45 Re: struct __attribute((packed));
2005-04-15 21:00 Re: struct __attribute((packed));

Ranjit Mathew

2005-04-06 13:23 Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE whenoptimized
2005-04-12 06:23 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-13 05:41 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-15 05:19 "make bootstrap" for cross builds

Ray Holme

2005-04-07 15:43 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 17:15 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 17:18 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-07 17:22 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-08 13:06 GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-12 12:45 Re: GCC 3.4.3
2005-04-18 13:37 libraries - double set

Rene Rebe

2005-04-27 09:49 gcc 4.0 miscompilation on sparc(32) with ultrasparc optmization
2005-04-27 17:39 Re: gcc 4.0 miscompilation on sparc(32) with ultrasparc optmization
2005-04-28 11:32 [BENCHMARK] comparing GCC 3.4 and 4.0 on an AMD Athlon-XP 2500+

Richard B. Johnson

2005-04-06 13:20 RE: [BUG mm] "fixed" i386 memcpy inlining buggy

Richard Earnshaw

2005-04-01 17:46 Re: gcc and vfp instructions
2005-04-06 09:37 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-07 14:34 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-07 15:14 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-08 15:45 Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
2005-04-15 14:39 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 16:42 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 17:08 RE: Processor-specific code
2005-04-25 14:26 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-26 12:44 RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler
2005-04-27 15:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 16:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 16:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 13:28 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 13:31 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 13:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 13:52 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Richard Guenther

2005-04-01 20:10 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 21:17 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-01 21:31 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-07 15:59 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-11 12:56 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-15 18:00 Re: inline-unit-growth trouble
2005-04-16 18:33 How to -Werror in a fortran testcase?
2005-04-27 14:20 fold_indirect_ref bogous
2005-04-27 17:16 Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous
2005-04-28 14:35 [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0].
2005-04-28 19:01 Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0].
2005-04-29 10:06 Testcase for loop in try_move_mult_to_index?

Richard Henderson

2005-04-05 01:01 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-09 05:21 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-09 15:38 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-11 21:08 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-12 20:11 ada build failure?
2005-04-14 16:50 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-14 17:24 Re: ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so
2005-04-14 17:35 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-14 20:14 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-14 23:10 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 04:39 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?
2005-04-19 05:01 Re: sync operations: where's the barrier?
2005-04-23 18:37 Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces
2005-04-27 05:30 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 16:35 Re: folding after TER notes
2005-04-29 20:35 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 22:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Richard Kenner

2005-04-07 17:31 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-09 11:59 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-09 12:03 Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?
2005-04-09 12:31 Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)
2005-04-09 14:28 Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074
2005-04-09 17:22 Re: [Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handle junk strings
2005-04-17 02:48 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 12:36 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 12:50 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 15:03 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 15:06 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 17:42 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-19 16:13 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-21 02:49 Re: RFA: .opt files for x86, darwin and lynxos
2005-04-21 21:00 Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?
2005-04-25 18:59 Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?

Richard Sandiford

2005-04-03 21:05 Re: SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt
2005-04-04 20:00 Re: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation
2005-04-05 20:59 Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
2005-04-05 21:25 Re: Using inline assembly with specific register indices
2005-04-11 18:41 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-12 20:55 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-12 21:15 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-13 06:48 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-14 08:51 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-19 07:09 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-19 07:21 Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0
2005-04-19 07:53 Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0
2005-04-19 13:19 Re: target_shift_truncation_mask for all shifts?!

Rob Hulswit

2005-04-15 15:41 Successful bootstrap of GCC 3.4.3 on i586-pc-interix3 (with one little problem)

Robert Dewar

2005-04-03 18:38 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-03 18:42 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-03 18:45 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-03 19:37 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-03 22:59 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-03 23:17 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-04 01:08 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-04 03:34 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
2005-04-04 19:24 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-14 19:57 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-14 20:48 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-15 14:50 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-16 00:47 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-16 01:36 Re: Template and dynamic dispatching
2005-04-16 08:19 Templates and C++ embedded subsets
2005-04-18 22:17 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-19 20:26 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
2005-04-19 21:04 Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++

Robert Kidd

2005-04-19 15:17 GCC superblock and region formation support

Roger Sayle

2005-04-13 19:19 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup fold_rtx, 1/n
2005-04-16 18:18 My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 05:46 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 15:42 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-30 17:15 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea
2005-04-30 17:44 Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status

Roland Mainz

2005-04-12 02:08 Re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction inX11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro (worksforme)

Rupert Wood

2005-04-11 12:05 RE: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]

Russell Shaw

2005-04-02 03:08 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?

Sachin Vijay Sonawane

2005-04-16 07:25 Doubt : Help

Sam Lauber

2005-04-01 11:40 Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-01 15:01 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 12:32 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 12:32 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 12:34 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta

2005-04-01 06:05 Re: symbol_ref constants

Satendra Pratap

2005-04-28 04:55 Global Objects initialization Problem.......

Scott A Crosby

2005-04-29 03:30 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?)
2005-04-29 14:16 Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?)

Scott Robert Ladd

2005-04-29 17:29 GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea
2005-04-30 11:25 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea

Sebastian Biallas

2005-04-21 14:34 Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418
2005-04-24 22:19 Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418
2005-04-25 20:33 Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418
2005-04-26 00:36 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)

Sergei Tovpeko

2005-04-25 06:13 object code execution statistics
2005-04-26 08:59 Re[2]: object code execution statistics

Shaun Jackman

2005-04-02 21:53 Re: Bug#300945: romeo: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment

shrao

2005-04-22 02:59 GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9

Simon G Best

2005-04-26 06:39 Successful Build Report for GCC 4.0.0 C and C++

sjhill

2005-04-06 17:14 Illegal promotion of bool to int....
2005-04-27 20:27 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Sriharsha Vedurmudi

2005-04-26 11:40 Free-Standing Implementation
2005-04-27 07:25 Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent

Stan Shebs

2005-04-27 22:13 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 21:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Stefan Strasser

2005-04-01 16:45 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-01 18:45 Re: i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end
2005-04-02 01:25 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 08:50 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-02 23:09 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-03 00:53 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-05 04:41 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)

Steve Ellcey

2005-04-21 20:52 IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?
2005-04-21 21:21 Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?
2005-04-25 18:35 Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?

Steve Kargl

2005-04-07 14:12 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-07 17:28 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-07 17:54 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-08 18:29 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-14 14:55 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-14 17:47 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-18 02:40 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-22 02:09 Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c
2005-04-22 15:49 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c
2005-04-22 21:56 Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c

Steve Yee

2005-04-16 05:13 implicit type cast problem of reference of ponter to const type

Steven Bosscher

2005-04-02 18:26 Re: GCC errors
2005-04-04 08:55 Re: about "Alias Analysis for Intermediate Code"
2005-04-04 20:49 Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-05 07:49 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
2005-04-05 09:42 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
2005-04-05 10:00 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
2005-04-08 07:30 Re: ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch
2005-04-08 22:36 Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30
2005-04-09 11:58 Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block?
2005-04-11 10:23 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
2005-04-12 18:59 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-13 11:48 Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn??
2005-04-13 13:31 Re: Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn??
2005-04-13 14:40 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm
2005-04-13 19:10 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm
2005-04-13 20:51 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup fold_rtx, 1/n
2005-04-13 22:30 Re: Basic block reordering algorithm
2005-04-15 08:38 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2
2005-04-18 10:01 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 14:30 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 19:06 Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization
2005-04-18 19:08 Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC?
2005-04-18 21:26 Novell thinks you are spam
2005-04-19 00:23 Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC?
2005-04-22 06:39 Re: SMS in gcc4.0
2005-04-23 22:37 Re: spill_failure
2005-04-25 08:53 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-27 19:57 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 20:36 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 20:41 Re: folding after TER notes
2005-04-28 16:45 Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?
2005-04-28 17:31 Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?

Steven J. Hill

2005-04-17 04:51 Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS...
2005-04-19 03:32 Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0...

sting sting

2005-04-23 07:35 writeable-strings (gcc 4 and lower versions) clarification

Stuart Hastings

2005-04-24 01:22 Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c)

tbp

2005-04-04 09:48 gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 10:15 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 10:56 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 11:03 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 11:08 Re: gcc4, namespace and template specialization problem
2005-04-04 14:17 gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement
2005-04-06 12:08 Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement
2005-04-06 12:23 Re: gcc4, static array, SSE & alignement
2005-04-20 21:21 Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?
2005-04-30 12:14 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea

thanh tuan

2005-04-13 08:30 Help me about C language Specification

Thomas Fitzsimmons

2005-04-12 22:21 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available

Thomas Koenig

2005-04-10 19:13 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze

Thomas Zander

2005-04-20 23:16 Typo in online GCJ docs.

Thorsten Glaser

2005-04-12 07:16 Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time
2005-04-26 08:01 sjlj exceptions?
2005-04-28 07:33 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-29 21:34 libjava/3.4.4 problem (was Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29))
2005-04-30 12:37 Re: libjava/3.4.4 problem

Timothy Bowers

2005-04-15 14:31 Questions on CC

Tom Tromey

2005-04-14 01:03 Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available
2005-04-19 18:10 Re: front-end tools for preprocessor / macro expansion
2005-04-19 18:23 Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available
2005-04-27 19:45 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 01:44 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Toon Moene

2005-04-05 21:25 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contributionto FSF
2005-04-06 18:44 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contributionto FSF
2005-04-07 18:28 Re: 2 suggestions
2005-04-10 14:00 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-22 19:20 Re: GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes

toon via RT

2005-04-05 21:26 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF
2005-04-05 21:26 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

Ulrich Weigand

2005-04-14 10:05 Re: reload-branch created

Uros Bizjak

2005-04-23 08:26 Re: GCC 4.0.0 fsincos?
2005-04-29 19:35 Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea

Vincent Lefevre

2005-04-07 15:37 Re: Inline round for IA64
2005-04-15 17:43 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-15 18:50 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-18 15:42 Re: Processor-specific code
2005-04-27 10:04 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 11:16 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 11:26 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 11:55 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 11:56 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 13:57 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 13:59 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 13:59 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 14:11 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 14:47 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 15:20 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 16:02 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-28 16:17 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious

Virender Kashyap

2005-04-07 18:58 ERROR : pls help
2005-04-07 19:37 Re: ERROR : pls help
2005-04-19 10:50 Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues

Vishal Kothari

2005-04-11 17:53 GCC Cross Compilation
2005-04-13 09:30 GCC Cross Compilation

vivek sukumaran

2005-04-08 08:39 benchmarks

Vladimir A. Merzliakov

2005-04-30 23:06 Re: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc

Vladimir Makarov

2005-04-07 17:32 Re: How to "disable" register allocation?
2005-04-26 13:42 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler
2005-04-26 15:06 Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler

Vladimir N. Makarov

2005-04-13 13:21 Re: Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn??

William Beebe

2005-04-22 18:36 Build of GCC 4.0.0 successful

William S Fulton

2005-04-25 04:36 gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning

Wolfgang Bangerth

2005-04-14 22:51 Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from
2005-04-14 23:14 Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from

Zack Weinberg

2005-04-01 01:14 Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
2005-04-03 19:43 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-03 23:38 Re: Use Bohem's GC for compiler proper in 4.1?
2005-04-06 17:53 Re: specs file
2005-04-10 19:23 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-12 16:48 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
2005-04-12 17:01 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-12 17:31 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-12 18:02 Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin
2005-04-17 02:03 Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers
2005-04-17 03:23 Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze
2005-04-19 07:39 Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0
2005-04-19 17:42 Re: CPP inconsistency
2005-04-22 19:52 Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9
2005-04-23 01:17 Re: different address spaces
2005-04-26 00:54 Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)
2005-04-26 20:15 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 06:24 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 06:40 Re: folding after TER notes
2005-04-27 10:37 Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
2005-04-27 23:40 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-27 23:42 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 00:10 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 00:28 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 03:07 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 03:21 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
2005-04-28 19:30 Re: std::string support UTF8?

Zagorodnev, Grigory

2005-04-07 20:32 RE: How to specify customized base addr?

Zdenek Dvorak

2005-04-05 09:55 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
2005-04-25 08:48 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-25 19:06 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-26 00:41 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-26 06:57 Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node
2005-04-29 10:16 Re: Testcase for loop in try_move_mult_to_index?

Zhaohui Zhou

2005-04-22 02:21 Help installing & using GCC

Zhenyu Guo

2005-04-08 04:04 Re: How to specify customized base addr?
2005-04-21 02:40 Call into a function?
2005-04-21 03:42 转发: Call into a function?
2005-04-24 03:15 benchmark call malloc a lot?

zouq

2005-04-04 08:35 about "Alias Analysis for Intermediate Code"
2005-04-05 07:53 Re: about "Alias Analysis for Intermediate Code"
2005-04-06 02:57 about alias analysis
2005-04-12 03:15 about the parse tree
2005-04-15 07:24 some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3
2005-04-24 06:59 about how to write makefile.in config-lang.in for a frontend
2005-04-27 08:35 about madd instruction in mips instruction sets

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

gcc archiveauthor index for April, 2005

gcc archive
author index for April, 2005