This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Marcin Dalecki'" <martin at dalecki dot de>,"'Karel Gardas'" <kgardas at objectsecurity dot com>
- Cc: "'Steven Bosscher'" <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>,"'GCC Mailing List'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 11:03:18 +0100
- Subject: RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
----Original Message----
>From: Marcin Dalecki
>Sent: 28 April 2005 02:58
> On 2005-04-27, at 22:54, Karel Gardas wrote:
>>
>> Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 2,456,727
>> Development Effort Estimate, Person-Years (Person-Months) = 725.95
>> (8,711.36) (Basic COCOMO model, Person-Months = 2.4 * (KSLOC**1.05))
>> Schedule Estimate, Years (Months) = 6.55 (78.55)
>> (Basic COCOMO model, Months = 2.5 * (person-months**0.38))
>> Estimated Average Number of Developers (Effort/Schedule) = 110.90
>> Total Estimated Cost to Develop = $ 98,065,527
>> (average salary = $56,286/year, overhead = 2.40).
>> Please credit this data as "generated using 'SLOCCount' by David A.
>> Wheeler."
>
> One question remains open: Who is Mr. Person?
What makes you think it's not Ms. Person? Chauvinist!
;)
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....