This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]

From: Andi Kleen <ak at muc dot de>
To: Daniel Kegel <dkegel at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, me at rupey dot net
Date: 13 Apr 2005 20:22:34 +0200
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:22:34 +0200
Subject: Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
References: <425AAD8E.1030601@google.com> <20050411170358.GA31028@nevyn.them.org> <m1ll7oymwa.fsf@muc.de> <20050412183431.GA8861@nevyn.them.org>

> Thanks.  I was under the impression that 2.4 doesn't build with GCC
> HEAD, anyway - I saw some patches pile up and not get applied.

AFAIK some gcc 4.0 patches went in. I assume it will build eventually
at least once 4.0 is released.

> Does 2.6 still use the option?

No.

However the change needed for that is really too big to backport, so 
I would prefer not to.

-Andi

References:
- RE: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
  - From: Daniel Kegel
- Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
  - From: Andi Kleen
- Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]