This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>, s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, matt at 3am-software dot com, cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:03:12 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
References: <200504272055.j3RKtJfL013789@earth.phy.uc.edu><1114694844.2729.240.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com><17008.59023.361787.925505@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><jebr7z80nt.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

Andreas Schwab writes:
 > Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
 > 
 > > If ld can't accept a list of files from a stream but is instead
 > > limited by command line length, then that *is* the fault of ld.
 > 
 > You can always use a linker script.

Yeah, good point.  libtool seems to go to extraordinary lengths to
avoid doing so, I presume because it isn't portable.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: David Edelsohn

References:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]