This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, dorit at il dot ibm dot com, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:58:28 -0400
Subject: Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <1112979122.5728.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1112981242.3733.192.camel@pain> <1112982275.5728.58.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 11:44:34AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

> For the alias not to be relevant would indicate that vectorization 
> actually improved alias analysis.
> 
Right.  Both ivopts and vectorization have that effect, and
that's why the IL needs to be rescanned.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]