This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

From: Thorsten Glaser <tg at 66h dot 42h dot de>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:31:06 +0000
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
References: <JCEPIPKHCJGDMPOHDOIGIECJCOAA.gary@intrepid.com><20050427152844.GA86951@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <426FB37D.3060507@3am-software.com><200504272157.21513.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> <42700E81.60105@apple.com><1114642999.18731.4.camel@linux.site> <8764y7n5zm.fsf@codesourcery.com><1114646358.18731.10.camel@linux.site> <87wtqnlq14.fsf@codesourcery.com><20050428010620.5D7729842C@baradas.org> <87oebzlhuk.fsf@codesourcery.com>

Zack Weinberg dixit:

>This could be made substantially easier if libgcc moved to the top
>level.  You wanna help out with that?

What about crtstuff?

//mirabile

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Gary Funck
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Matt Thomas
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Peter Barada
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]