This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: folding after TER notes

From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:52:39 -0600
Subject: Re: folding after TER notes
Organization: Red Hat, Inc
References: <1114583801.17200.149.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050427163529.GA24556@redhat.com>
Reply-to: law at redhat dot com

On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 09:35 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 12:36:41AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > Anyway, I'm going to look into why we're seeing so many *& expressions
> > during TER.
> 
> We have an open PR for this.  We don't propagate the & when
> it's not a constant.  Like in &x->y.
yea, I figured that out about 10 minutes ago :-)  I'm going to dig
out some old patches from Andrew Pinskii which might address this
problem.  I'll note that a tree combiner would fix this problem :-)

jeff
> 
> 
> r~

References:
- folding after TER notes
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: folding after TER notes
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]