Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-04-05)

[Stefan Strasser <sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de>]

Mark Mitchell schrieb:
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> > On Apr 4, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > > 20734 rejects valid pointer to member
> > >
> > >   Not yet assigned.
> >
> >
> >
> > How is this less Critical?
> > This would breaks lots of code, it is template related too as it is not
> > rejected when not in templates.
>
>
> Clearly this is a judgement call.
>
> However, I think it's less critical because pointers-to-members and, in 
> particular, pointers-to-members in templates are relatively less common. 
>  And, it's rejects-valid, so at least you know that you have a problem. 
>  And there are workarounds.  In contrast, the top bug on the list is 
> known to cause silent miscompilation of Qt, a very major package, and 
> it's not easy to know where the problem is.

what is the workaround to this?
(in the case the class the pointer target is a member of is a template 
parameter, unlike in the PR test case)


--
Stefan Strasser