This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 11:03 -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:Someone complained I was unfair in my gcc bootstrap times since some builds included libjava/gfortran and some did not.
So in the past day, I've done bootstrap with just c,c++,objc on both 3.4 and gcc4.1. I've put the results in a web page at http://3am-software.com/gcc-speed.html. The initial bootstrap compiler was gcc3.3 and they are all running off the same base of NetBSD 3.99.3.
While taking out fortran and java reduced the disparity, there is still a large increase in bootstrap times from 3.4 to 4.1.
I'm sure you used disable-checking on the 4.1 test, right? Since otherwise, it's a worthless comparison
Forget it, i missed it in the light green on black text :)
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |