This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: folding after TER notes

From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:15:35 -0600
Subject: Re: folding after TER notes
Organization: Red Hat, Inc
References: <1114583801.17200.149.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87zmvkn2no.fsf@codesourcery.com> <1114590143.17200.151.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114606044.10172.1745.camel@pain>
Reply-to: law at redhat dot com

On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 08:47 -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 04:22, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 23:40 -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > > Wasn't TER a temporary kludge that should be going away?
> > When we have a tree combiner I would expect TER to disappear.
> 
> Or if tree expansion were rewritten. One of the many things still on the
> todo list.
Actually both are probably necessary to really kill TER.

jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: folding after TER notes
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- folding after TER notes
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: folding after TER notes
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: folding after TER notes
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: folding after TER notes
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]