This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious
On 2005-04-27 14:30:01 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2005, at 5:15 AM, Neil Booth wrote:
> >Even better, you can turn of the warning with a cast, making your
> >intent explicit to the compiler, so there's every reason to have
> >it on by default.
> And, if you don't like casts, you can (...)&255 or whatever.
This is quite dirty if the type comes from an internal structure
of some library, where the size of the integer may depend on the
architecture or may change in the future... Do you see a better
Vincent Lefèvre <firstname.lastname@example.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA